• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年跌倒者停药的成本效益:改善药物处方以降低跌倒风险(IMPROveFALL)试验的结果

Cost-utility of medication withdrawal in older fallers: results from the improving medication prescribing to reduce risk of FALLs (IMPROveFALL) trial.

作者信息

Polinder Suzanne, Boyé Nicole D A, Mattace-Raso Francesco U S, Van der Velde Nathalie, Hartholt Klaas A, De Vries Oscar J, Lips Paul, Van der Cammen Tischa J M, Patka Peter, Van Beeck Ed F, Van Lieshout Esther M M

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2016 Nov 4;16(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0354-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-016-0354-7
PMID:27809792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5096283/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of Fall-Risk-Increasing-Drugs (FRIDs) has been associated with increased risk of falls and associated injuries. This study investigates the effect of withdrawal of FRIDs versus 'care as usual' on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), costs, and cost-utility in community-dwelling older fallers.

METHODS

In a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial FRIDs assessment combined with FRIDs-withdrawal or modification was compared with 'care as usual' in older persons, who visited the emergency department after experiencing a fall. For the calculation of costs the direct medical costs (intramural and extramural) and indirect costs (travel costs) were collected for a 12 month period. HRQoL was measured at baseline and at 12 months follow-up using the EuroQol-5D and Short Form-12 version 2. The change in EuroQol-5D and Short Form-12 scores over 12 months follow-up within the control and intervention groups was compared using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for continuous variables and the McNemar test for dichotomous variables. The change in scores between the control and intervention groups were compared using a two-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

We included 612 older persons who visited an emergency department because of a fall. The mean cost of the FRIDs intervention was €120 per patient. The total fall-related healthcare costs (without the intervention costs) did not differ significantly between the intervention group and the control group (€2204 versus €2285). However, the withdrawal of FRIDs reduced medication costs with a mean of €38 per participant. Furthermore, the control group had a greater decline in EuroQol-5D utility score during the 12-months follow-up than the intervention group (p = 0.02). The change in the Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scores did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Withdrawal of FRID's in older persons who visited an emergency department due to a fall, did not lead to reduction of total health-care costs. However, the withdrawal of FRIDs reduced medication costs with a mean of €38 per participant in combination with less decline in HRQoL is an important result.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register ( NTR1593 - October 1 2008).

摘要

背景

使用增加跌倒风险的药物(FRIDs)与跌倒及相关损伤风险增加有关。本研究调查停用FRIDs与“常规护理”相比,对社区居住的老年跌倒者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、成本及成本效用的影响。

方法

在一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验中,将FRIDs评估并结合FRIDs停用或调整与“常规护理”进行比较,对象为跌倒后前往急诊科就诊的老年人。为计算成本,收集了12个月期间的直接医疗成本(机构内和机构外)和间接成本(交通成本)。使用欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol-5D)和简明健康调查问卷(Short Form-12)第2版在基线和12个月随访时测量HRQoL。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较连续变量在对照组和干预组12个月随访期间欧洲五维健康量表和简明健康调查问卷得分的变化,使用McNemar检验比较二分变量得分的变化。使用双向方差分析比较对照组和干预组得分的变化。

结果

我们纳入了612名因跌倒前往急诊科就诊的老年人。FRIDs干预的平均成本为每位患者120欧元。干预组和对照组之间与跌倒相关的总医疗成本(不包括干预成本)无显著差异(2204欧元对2285欧元)。然而,停用FRIDs使每位参与者的药物成本平均降低38欧元。此外,在12个月随访期间,对照组欧洲五维健康量表效用得分的下降幅度大于干预组(p = 0.02)。两组之间简明健康调查问卷身体成分汇总得分和精神成分汇总得分的变化无显著差异。

结论

因跌倒前往急诊科就诊的老年人停用FRIDs并未导致总医疗成本降低。然而,停用FRIDs使每位参与者的药物成本平均降低38欧元,同时HRQoL下降幅度较小,这是一个重要结果。

试验注册

该试验已在荷兰试验注册库注册(NTR1593 - 2008年10月1日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73cc/5096283/bcd763f88f02/12877_2016_354_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73cc/5096283/6ef61e3b5c1a/12877_2016_354_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73cc/5096283/bcd763f88f02/12877_2016_354_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73cc/5096283/6ef61e3b5c1a/12877_2016_354_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73cc/5096283/bcd763f88f02/12877_2016_354_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-utility of medication withdrawal in older fallers: results from the improving medication prescribing to reduce risk of FALLs (IMPROveFALL) trial.老年跌倒者停药的成本效益:改善药物处方以降低跌倒风险(IMPROveFALL)试验的结果
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Nov 4;16(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0354-7.
2
Effectiveness of medication withdrawal in older fallers: results from the Improving Medication Prescribing to reduce Risk Of FALLs (IMPROveFALL) trial.老年人跌倒者停药的效果:来自改善药物处方以降低跌倒风险(IMPROveFALL)试验的结果。
Age Ageing. 2017 Jan 10;46(1):142-146. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw161.
3
[Cost] effectiveness of withdrawal of fall-risk increasing drugs versus conservative treatment in older fallers: design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (IMPROveFALL-study).[成本] 增加跌倒风险药物撤药与老年跌倒者保守治疗的效果比较:一项多中心随机对照试验(IMPROveFALL 研究)的设计。
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Aug 21;11:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-48.
4
Assessing the Efficacy of the ARMOR Tool-Based Deprescribing Intervention for Fall Risk Reduction in Older Patients Taking Fall Risk-Increasing Drugs (DeFRID Trial): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.评估基于 ARMOR 工具的药物减量干预措施对服用增加跌倒风险药物的老年患者跌倒风险降低的疗效(DeFRID 试验):一项随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 11;13:e55638. doi: 10.2196/55638.
5
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for falls prevention in older people: a multicentre cohort randomised controlled trial (the REducing Falls with ORthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention trial).多方面足病学干预预防老年人跌倒的临床有效性和成本效益:一项多中心队列随机对照试验(使用矫形器和多方面足病学干预减少跌倒试验)
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Apr;21(24):1-198. doi: 10.3310/hta21240.
6
Physical performance and quality of life in single and recurrent fallers: data from the Improving Medication Prescribing to Reduce Risk of Falls study.单次跌倒者与反复跌倒者的身体机能和生活质量:来自“改善药物处方以降低跌倒风险”研究的数据。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Mar;15(3):350-5. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12287. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
7
Effects of a clinical decision support system and patient portal for preventing medication-related falls in older fallers: Protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded process and economic evaluations (ADFICE_IT).预防老年人跌倒相关药物事件的临床决策支持系统和患者门户的效果:一项具有嵌入式过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验方案(ADFICE_IT)。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 26;18(9):e0289385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289385. eCollection 2023.
8
Fall risk-increasing drugs and falls: a cross-sectional study among elderly patients in primary care.增加跌倒风险的药物与跌倒:一项针对基层医疗中老年患者的横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Mar 27;14:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-40.
9
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Randomized Control Trial of a Tailored, Multifactorial Program to Prevent Falls Among the Community-Dwelling Elderly.一项针对社区居住老年人量身定制的多因素预防跌倒的随机对照试验的成本效益分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.434. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
10
Can occupational therapist-led home environmental assessment prevent falls in older people? A modified cohort randomised controlled trial protocol.职业治疗师主导的家庭环境评估能否预防老年人跌倒?一项改良队列随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 10;8(9):e022488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022488.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Department Programs to Support Medication Safety in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.支持老年人用药安全的急诊科项目:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250814. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0814.
2
Multimorbidity, medications, and their association with falls, physical activity, and cognitive functions in older adults: multicenter study in Sri Lanka.老年人的多重疾病、药物及其与跌倒、身体活动和认知功能的关联:斯里兰卡的多中心研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 20;15(1):6233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91037-5.
3
Measuring Quality of Life in Deprescribing Trials: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of medication withdrawal in older fallers: results from the Improving Medication Prescribing to reduce Risk Of FALLs (IMPROveFALL) trial.老年人跌倒者停药的效果:来自改善药物处方以降低跌倒风险(IMPROveFALL)试验的结果。
Age Ageing. 2017 Jan 10;46(1):142-146. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw161.
2
The economic burden of injury: Health care and productivity costs of injuries in the Netherlands.伤害的经济负担:荷兰伤害的医疗保健和生产力成本
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 10.
3
Drug-induced falls in older persons: is there a role for therapeutic drug monitoring?
测量减药试验中的生活质量:范围综述。
Drugs Aging. 2024 May;41(5):379-397. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01113-0. Epub 2024 May 6.
4
Challenges and opportunities in creating a deprescribing program in the emergency department: A qualitative study.在急诊科创建药物减量计划面临的挑战和机遇:一项定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jan;71(1):62-76. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18047. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
5
Systematic causality mapping of factors leading to accidental falls of older adults.导致老年人意外跌倒的因素的系统因果关系映射。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2020 Oct 14;1:100045. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100045. eCollection 2020 Nov.
6
Exploration of Symptom Scale as an Outcome for Deprescribing: A Medication Review Study in Nursing Homes.探索症状量表作为减药结果指标:一项养老院药物审查研究
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;15(5):505. doi: 10.3390/ph15050505.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Antihypertensive Deprescribing in Primary Care: a Markov Modelling Study Using Data From the OPTiMISE Trial.降压药物停药的成本效益:来自 OPTiMISE 试验数据的马克夫模型研究。
Hypertension. 2022 May;79(5):1122-1131. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18726. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
8
Five Key Papers About Emergency Department Fall Evaluation: A Curated Collection for Emergency Physicians.关于急诊科跌倒评估的五篇关键论文:为急诊医生精心整理的文集。
Cureus. 2021 Sep 4;13(9):e17717. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17717. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Moving the needle on fall prevention: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network scoping review and consensus statement.推动跌倒预防工作:老年急诊护理应用研究(GEAR)网络范围界定审查和共识声明。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;28(11):1214-1227. doi: 10.1111/acem.14279. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
10
Does a Recumbent Lateral Stability Trainer Improve Balance Scores Among Older Adults Within 4 Weeks?卧床侧卧位稳定性训练器是否能在 4 周内提高老年人的平衡评分?
Perm J. 2021 May;25. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.100.
老年人药物性跌倒:治疗药物监测是否起作用?
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2016 Apr;7(2):39-42. doi: 10.1177/2042098615627806. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
4
Circumstances leading to injurious falls in older men and women in the Netherlands.荷兰老年男性和女性发生致伤跌倒的相关情况。
Injury. 2014 Aug;45(8):1224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
5
Cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention program in nursing homes.养老院多因素跌倒预防计划的成本效益。
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Apr;24(4):1215-23. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2075-x. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
6
Community falls prevention for people who call an emergency ambulance after a fall: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.社区跌倒预防服务对跌倒后呼叫急救车的人群:一项随机对照试验的经济学评价。
Age Ageing. 2012 Sep;41(5):635-41. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs071. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
7
How much are we willing to pay to prevent a fall? Cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial falls prevention program for community-dwelling older adults.我们愿意花多少钱来预防跌倒?多因素跌倒预防计划在社区居住的老年人中的成本效益。
Can J Aging. 2012 Jun;31(2):121-37. doi: 10.1017/S0714980812000074. Epub 2012 May 24.
8
Costs of falls in an ageing population: a nationwide study from the Netherlands (2007-2009).人口老龄化导致的跌倒成本:来自荷兰的全国性研究(2007-2009 年)。
Injury. 2012 Jul;43(7):1199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.03.033. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
9
Dose-response relationship between selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and injurious falls: a study in nursing home residents with dementia.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与伤害性跌倒之间的剂量反应关系:一项在养老院痴呆患者中的研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;73(5):812-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04124.x.
10
Why older people refuse to participate in falls prevention trials: a qualitative study.为什么老年人拒绝参与防跌倒试验:一项定性研究。
Exp Gerontol. 2012 Apr;47(4):342-5. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Jan 28.