• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为医学生同理心预测指标的医学院校选拔标准:爱尔兰医学生的横断面研究

Medical school selection criteria as predictors of medical student empathy: a cross-sectional study of medical students, Ireland.

作者信息

O'Sullivan Donnchadh M, Moran Joseph, Corcoran Paul, O'Flynn Siun, O'Tuathaigh Colm, O'Sullivan Aoife M

机构信息

School of Medicine, University College Cork, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, Cork, Ireland.

Department of General Practice, Western Gateway Building, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 1;7(7):e016076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016076.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016076
PMID:28765129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5642670/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether performance in any of the Health Professions Admissions Test (HPAT) sections, most specifically the interpersonal understanding section, correlates with self-reported empathy levels in medical students.

SETTING

The study was conducted in University College Cork, Ireland.

PARTICIPANTS

290 students participated in the study. Matching HPAT scores were available for 263 students. All male and female undergraduate students were invited to participate. Postgraduate and international students were excluded.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary measures: HPAT-Ireland and Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSE) scores were compared including subsection analysis. Secondary measures: comparisons were made between groups such as gender and year of programme.

RESULTS

A total of 290 students participated. Males scored significantly higher than females for total HPAT-Ireland (U=7329, z=-2.04, p<0.05), HPAT-Ireland section 1 (U=5382, z=-5.21, p<0.001) and section 3 scores (U=6833, z=-2.85, p<0.01). In contrast, females scored significantly higher than males on HPAT-Ireland section 2 (U=5844, z=-4.46, p<0.001). Females demonstrated significantly higher total JSE scores relative to males (mean score ± SEM: 113.33±1.05 109.21±0.95; U=8450, z=-2.83, p<0.01). No significant association was observed between JSE scores and any of the HPAT-Ireland measures (all p>0.05). There was no effect of programme year on JSE scores (all p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of the HPAT-Ireland test was partly designed to identify students with strong interpersonal skills. A significant finding of this study is that JSE values did not correlate with HPAT-Ireland scores. This study suggests no clear link between scores on a selection test, the HPAT-Ireland, which is designed to assess several skill domains including interpersonal skills, and scores on a psychometric measure of empathy, at any point during medical education.

摘要

目的

确定健康职业入学考试(HPAT)各部分的表现,尤其是人际理解部分,是否与医学生自我报告的共情水平相关。

背景

该研究在爱尔兰科克大学学院进行。

参与者

290名学生参与了该研究。263名学生有匹配的HPAT分数。所有本科男女学生均被邀请参与。研究生和国际学生被排除在外。

主要和次要结局指标

主要指标:比较HPAT-爱尔兰和杰斐逊医生共情量表(JSE)的分数,包括子部分分析。次要指标:在性别和课程年份等组间进行比较。

结果

共有290名学生参与。在HPAT-爱尔兰总分(U = 7329,z = -2.04,p < 0.05)、HPAT-爱尔兰第1部分(U = 5382,z = -5.21,p < 0.001)和第3部分分数(U = 6833,z = -2.85,p < 0.01)方面,男性得分显著高于女性。相比之下,女性在HPAT-爱尔兰第2部分的得分显著高于男性(U = 5844,z = -4.46,p < 0.001)。相对于男性,女性的JSE总分显著更高(平均得分±标准误:113.33±1.05对109.21±0.95;U = 8450,z = -2.83,p < 0.01)。未观察到JSE分数与任何HPAT-爱尔兰测量指标之间存在显著关联(所有p > 0.05)。课程年份对JSE分数没有影响(所有p > 0.05)。

结论

引入HPAT-爱尔兰考试的部分目的是识别具有较强人际技能的学生。本研究的一个重要发现是JSE值与HPAT-爱尔兰分数不相关。本研究表明,旨在评估包括人际技能在内的多个技能领域的选拔考试HPAT-爱尔兰的分数,与医学教育期间任何时间点的共情心理测量分数之间没有明确联系。

相似文献

1
Medical school selection criteria as predictors of medical student empathy: a cross-sectional study of medical students, Ireland.作为医学生同理心预测指标的医学院校选拔标准:爱尔兰医学生的横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 1;7(7):e016076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016076.
2
To what extent does the Health Professions Admission Test-Ireland predict performance in early undergraduate tests of communication and clinical skills? An observational cohort study.爱尔兰健康职业入学考试在多大程度上预测了本科生早期沟通和临床技能测试中的表现?一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 May 10;13:68. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-68.
3
Measuring empathy in a group of South African undergraduate medical students using the student version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy.使用杰斐逊共情量表学生版对一组南非本科医学生的共情能力进行测量。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2019 May 27;11(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1956.
4
The construct validity of HPAT-Ireland for the selection of medical students: unresolved issues and future research implications.爱尔兰高等医学能力倾向测试(HPAT-Ireland)用于医学生选拔的结构效度:未解决的问题及对未来研究的启示
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 May;22(2):267-286. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9728-z. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
5
The Health Professions Admission Test (HPAT) score and leaving certificate results can independently predict academic performance in medical school: do we need both tests?健康职业入学考试(HPAT)成绩和高中毕业证书考试成绩能够独立预测医学院的学业表现:我们需要这两项考试吗?
Ir Med J. 2010 Nov-Dec;103(10):300-2.
6
Measuring Medical Students' Empathy: Exploring the Underlying Constructs of and Associations Between Two Widely Used Self-Report Instruments in Five Countries.测量医学生的同理心:探索五个国家中两种广泛使用的自我报告工具的潜在结构及两者之间的关联。
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):860-867. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001449.
7
Cognitive empathy of osteopathic students: a longitudinal study with data comparisons to the Project in Osteopathic Medical Education and Empathy (POMEE).骨科学学生的认知同理心:一项纵向研究,并与骨科学医学教育和同理心项目(POMEE)的数据进行比较。
J Osteopath Med. 2023 Sep 13;124(1):13-20. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0014. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
8
A cross-sectional study of student empathy across four medical schools in Denmark-associations between empathy level and age, sex, specialty preferences and motivation.丹麦四所医学院学生同理心的横断面研究——同理心水平与年龄、性别、专业偏好和动机之间的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 23;22(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03532-2.
9
A comparison of performances of consultant surgeons, NCHDs and medical students in a modified HPAT examination.在一场改良的HPAT考试中,顾问外科医生、非临床医院医生(NCHDs)和医学生的表现比较。
Ir Med J. 2010 Jun;103(6):172-3.
10
Empathy among undergraduate medical students: A multi-centre cross-sectional comparison of students beginning and approaching the end of their course.本科医学生的同理心:对课程开始阶段和接近结束阶段学生的多中心横断面比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Mar 15;16:92. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0603-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights into undergraduate medical student selection tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.本科医学生选拔工具的研究进展:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:22. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.22. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
2
Doctors' attitudes in the situation of delivering bad news: patients' experience and expectations.医生在传达坏消息时的态度:患者的体验与期望。
Arch Med Sci. 2021 Jan 8;19(4):921-929. doi: 10.5114/aoms/112756. eCollection 2023.
3
Students' self-perception of empathy in caring.学生对关怀中的同理心的自我认知。
Curationis. 2023 Jun 23;46(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2364.
4
Measurement of empathy among health professionals during Syrian crisis using the Syrian empathy scale.运用叙利亚同理心量表测量叙利亚危机期间卫生专业人员的同理心。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jul 29;21(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02835-0.
5
Searching for the erosion of empathy in medical undergraduate students: a longitudinal study.探寻医学本科生同理心的侵蚀:一项纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 31;10(12):e041810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041810.
6
Empathy variation of undergraduate medical students after early clinical contact: a cross-sectional study in China.本科医学生早期临床接触后的同理心变化:中国的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 19;10(7):e035690. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035690.
7
Impact of University Mergers on Admission of Medical Students in China.大学合并对中国医学生招生的影响。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 May 19;11:351-358. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S248210. eCollection 2020.
8
Medical students' empathy and attitudes towards professionalism: Relationship with personality, specialty preference and medical programme.医学生的同理心和专业态度:与个性、专业偏好和医学项目的关系。
PLoS One. 2019 May 2;14(5):e0215675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215675. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Medical Students' Empathy: Exploring the Underlying Constructs of and Associations Between Two Widely Used Self-Report Instruments in Five Countries.测量医学生的同理心:探索五个国家中两种广泛使用的自我报告工具的潜在结构及两者之间的关联。
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):860-867. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001449.
2
The construct validity of HPAT-Ireland for the selection of medical students: unresolved issues and future research implications.爱尔兰高等医学能力倾向测试(HPAT-Ireland)用于医学生选拔的结构效度:未解决的问题及对未来研究的启示
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 May;22(2):267-286. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9728-z. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
3
Nurturing empathy and compassion: what might the neurosciences have to offer?培养同理心和同情心:神经科学能提供什么?
Med Educ. 2016 Mar;50(3):281-2. doi: 10.1111/medu.12980.
4
How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review.医学教育中的选择方法有多有效?系统评价。
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):36-60. doi: 10.1111/medu.12817.
5
Development of a metacognitive effort construct of empathy during clinical training: a longitudinal study of the factor structure of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy.临床培训期间共情元认知努力结构的发展:杰斐逊共情量表因子结构的纵向研究
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Mar;21(1):5-17. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9605-1. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Can empathy, other personality attributes, and level of positive social influence in medical school identify potential leaders in medicine?医学院校中的同理心、其他人格特质以及积极社会影响力水平能否识别出医学领域的潜在领导者?
Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):505-10. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000652.
7
Exploration and confirmation of the latent variable structure of the Jefferson scale of empathy.杰斐逊共情量表潜在变量结构的探索与验证
Int J Med Educ. 2014 Apr 20;5:73-81. doi: 10.5116/ijme.533f.0c41.
8
Assessments of empathy in medical school admissions: what additional evidence is needed?医学院招生中同理心评估:还需要哪些额外证据?
Int J Med Educ. 2014 Jan 11;5:7-10. doi: 10.5116/ijme.52b7.5294.
9
Predicting academic outcomes in an Australian graduate entry medical programme.预测澳大利亚研究生入学医学项目的学业成绩。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Feb 15;14:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-31.
10
Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.取消医学院入学面试与入学学生中的性别偏见有关。
Med J Aust. 2014 Feb 3;200(2):96-9. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10103.