Ouellette Daniel R, Patel Sheena, Girard Timothy D, Morris Peter E, Schmidt Gregory A, Truwit Jonathon D, Alhazzani Waleed, Burns Suzanne M, Epstein Scott K, Esteban Andres, Fan Eddy, Ferrer Miguel, Fraser Gilles L, Gong Michelle Ng, Hough Catherine L, Mehta Sangeeta, Nanchal Rahul, Pawlik Amy J, Schweickert William D, Sessler Curtis N, Strøm Thomas, Kress John P
Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
CHEST, Glenview, IL.
Chest. 2017 Jan;151(1):166-180. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.036. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
An update of evidence-based guidelines concerning liberation from mechanical ventilation is needed as new evidence has become available. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) have collaborated to provide recommendations to clinicians concerning liberation from the ventilator.
Comprehensive evidence syntheses, including meta-analyses, were performed to summarize all available evidence relevant to the guideline panel's questions. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and the results were summarized in evidence profiles. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations developed and approved by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation.
Recommendations for three population, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) questions concerning ventilator liberation are presented in this document. The guideline panel considered the balance of desirable (benefits) and undesirable (burdens, adverse effects, costs) consequences, quality of evidence, feasibility, and acceptability of various interventions with respect to the selected questions. Conditional (weak) recommendations were made to use inspiratory pressure augmentation in the initial spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and to use protocols to minimize sedation for patients ventilated for more than 24 h. A strong recommendation was made to use preventive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for high-risk patients ventilated for more than 24 h immediately after extubation to improve selected outcomes. The recommendations were limited by the quality of the available evidence.
The guideline panel provided recommendations for inspiratory pressure augmentation during an initial SBT, protocols minimizing sedation, and preventative NIV, in relation to ventilator liberation.
由于已有新证据,因此需要更新关于机械通气撤机的循证指南。美国胸科医师学会(CHEST)和美国胸科学会(ATS)合作,为临床医生提供有关呼吸机撤机的建议。
进行了全面的证据综合分析,包括荟萃分析,以总结与指南小组问题相关的所有现有证据。使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法对证据进行评估,并将结果汇总在证据概况中。证据综合分析经过了讨论,机械通气领域的多学科专家委员会制定并批准了相关建议。
本文针对与呼吸机撤机相关的三个“人群、干预措施、对照、结局”(PICO)问题提出了建议。指南小组考虑了各种干预措施在所选问题上的有利(益处)和不利(负担、不良反应、成本)后果之间的平衡、证据质量、可行性和可接受性。对于在初始自主呼吸试验(SBT)中使用吸气压力增强以及对通气超过24小时的患者使用方案以尽量减少镇静,给出了有条件(弱)推荐。对于高危患者在拔管后立即使用预防性无创通气(NIV)超过24小时以改善特定结局,给出了强烈推荐。这些建议受到现有证据质量的限制。
指南小组针对初始SBT期间的吸气压力增强、尽量减少镇静的方案以及预防性NIV在呼吸机撤机方面提供了建议。