Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):115-119. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2076ST.
This clinical practice guideline addresses six questions related to liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill adults. It is the result of a collaborative effort between the American Thoracic Society and the American College of Chest Physicians.
A multidisciplinary panel posed six clinical questions in a Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes format. A comprehensive literature search and evidence synthesis was performed for each question, which included appraising the certainty in the evidence (i.e., the quality of evidence) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The Evidence-to-Decision framework was applied to each question, requiring the panel to evaluate and weigh the importance of the problem, the confidence in the evidence, the certainty about how much the public values the main outcomes, the magnitude and balance of desirable and undesirable outcomes, the resources and costs associated with the intervention, the impact on health disparities, and the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention.
Evidence-based recommendations were formulated and graded initially by subcommittees and then modified after full-panel discussions. The recommendations were confirmed by confidential electronic voting; approval required that at least 80% of the panel members agree with the recommendation.
The panel provides recommendations regarding liberation from mechanical ventilation. The details regarding the evidence and rationale for each recommendation are presented in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Chest.
本临床实践指南针对重症成人机械通气撤离的六个问题。它是美国胸科学会和美国胸科医师学会合作的成果。
一个多学科小组以人群、干预、对照和结局的形式提出了六个临床问题。对每个问题都进行了全面的文献检索和证据综合,包括使用推荐评估、制定、发展和评估方法评估证据的确定性(即证据质量)。每个问题都应用了证据决策框架,要求小组评估和权衡问题的重要性、证据的可信度、公众对主要结局的重视程度、理想和不良结局的大小和平衡、干预相关的资源和成本、对健康差异的影响,以及干预的可接受性和可行性。
根据小组委员会的初步建议和分级,然后在全体小组讨论后进行修改。推荐意见通过保密电子投票确认;批准要求至少 80%的小组成员同意该建议。
小组提供了关于机械通气撤离的建议。关于每个建议的证据和理由的详细信息都发表在《美国呼吸与危重症医学杂志》和《胸部》上。