Meghnani Varsha, Mohammed Nadeem, Giauque Christopher, Nahire Rahul, David Thomas
Castle Medical, LLC, 5700 Highlands Parkway, Suite No. 100, Smyrna, GA 30082, USA.
Int J Genomics. 2016;2016:2059041. doi: 10.1155/2016/2059041. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
Identification of pathogenic germline mutations by next generation sequencing is a widely accepted tool for predicting the risk of hereditary cancer development. Blood is the most common source of DNA for such tests. However, blood as a sample type has many drawbacks, including the invasive collection method, poor sample stability, and a relatively high cost of collection. Therefore, in the current study we have assessed the suitability of saliva as an alternative source of genomic DNA for the identification of germline mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes by next generation sequencing (NGS). Our results show that all of the samples yielded DNA concentrations sufficient for library preparation. The concentrations of the final libraries, which were generated by PCR using target specific primers, fall into the expected range with no notable difference between libraries generated from DNA derived from saliva or blood. Quality parameters indicate that sequencing performance is comparable across sample source. An average of (98 ± 0.02)% variant calling concordance was obtained between the two specimen sources. Our data recommends saliva as a potential alternative for detecting germline mutation by next generation sequencing.
通过下一代测序鉴定致病种系突变是预测遗传性癌症发生风险的一种广泛接受的工具。血液是此类检测中最常见的DNA来源。然而,血液作为一种样本类型有许多缺点,包括侵入性的采集方法、样本稳定性差以及采集成本相对较高。因此,在本研究中,我们评估了唾液作为基因组DNA替代来源的适用性,通过下一代测序(NGS)鉴定BRCA1/2基因中的种系突变。我们的结果表明,所有样本产生的DNA浓度足以用于文库制备。使用靶标特异性引物通过PCR生成的最终文库浓度落在预期范围内,源自唾液或血液的DNA生成的文库之间无显著差异。质量参数表明,不同样本来源的测序性能相当。两个样本来源之间的变异调用一致性平均为(98±0.02)%。我们的数据推荐唾液作为下一代测序检测种系突变的潜在替代样本。