Suppr超能文献

踝关节骨折修复后是否建议取出内固定物?

Is Hardware Removal Recommended after Ankle Fracture Repair?

作者信息

Jung Hong-Geun, Kim Jin-Il, Park Jae-Yong, Park Jong-Tae, Eom Joon-Sang, Lee Dong-Oh

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 4-12 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-729, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, 896 Pyungchon-dong, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi 431-070, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5250672. doi: 10.1155/2016/5250672. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

Abstract

The indications and clinical necessity for routine hardware removal after treating ankle or distal tibia fracture with open reduction and internal fixation are disputed even when hardware-related pain is insignificant. Thus, we determined the clinical effects of routine hardware removal irrespective of the degree of hardware-related pain, especially in the perspective of patients' daily activities. This study was conducted on 80 consecutive cases (78 patients) treated by surgery and hardware removal after bony union. There were 56 ankle and 24 distal tibia fractures. The hardware-related pain, ankle joint stiffness, discomfort on ambulation, and patient satisfaction were evaluated before and at least 6 months after hardware removal. Pain score before hardware removal was 3.4 (range 0 to 6) and decreased to 1.3 (range 0 to 6) after removal. 58 (72.5%) patients experienced improved ankle stiffness and 65 (81.3%) less discomfort while walking on uneven ground and 63 (80.8%) patients were satisfied with hardware removal. These results suggest that routine hardware removal after ankle or distal tibia fracture could ameliorate hardware-related pain and improves daily activities and patient satisfaction even when the hardware-related pain is minimal.

摘要

对于采用切开复位内固定治疗踝关节或胫骨远端骨折后常规取出内固定物的适应证及临床必要性,即便内固定物相关疼痛不明显,也存在争议。因此,我们确定了常规取出内固定物的临床效果,而不考虑内固定物相关疼痛的程度,尤其是从患者日常活动的角度。本研究纳入了80例连续病例(78名患者),这些患者在骨折骨性愈合后接受了手术及内固定物取出术。其中踝关节骨折56例,胫骨远端骨折24例。在内固定物取出术前及取出后至少6个月评估内固定物相关疼痛、踝关节僵硬、行走不适及患者满意度。内固定物取出术前疼痛评分为3.4(范围0至6),取出后降至1.3(范围0至6)。58例(72.5%)患者踝关节僵硬得到改善,65例(81.3%)患者在不平地面行走时不适减轻,63例(80.8%)患者对取出内固定物感到满意。这些结果表明,踝关节或胫骨远端骨折后常规取出内固定物即使在内固定物相关疼痛很轻微时,也可减轻内固定物相关疼痛,改善日常活动及患者满意度。

相似文献

1
Is Hardware Removal Recommended after Ankle Fracture Repair?
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5250672. doi: 10.1155/2016/5250672. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
3
A clinical evaluation of alternative fixation techniques for medial malleolus fractures.
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1365-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.05.031. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
6
The Fate of the Fixed Syndesmosis Over Time.
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Oct;36(10):1202-8. doi: 10.1177/1071100715588186. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
8
Injury to the Posterior Tibial Tendon After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of the Medial Malleolus.
Foot Ankle Spec. 2015 Oct;8(5):360-3. doi: 10.1177/1938640015583308. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
10
Osteonecrosis of distal tibia in open dislocation fractures of the ankle.
Injury. 2014 Oct;45(10):1659-63. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.023. Epub 2014 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors and Radiographic Findings Influencing Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Maisonneuve Fractures.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 15;15(8):e43536. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43536. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Effect of hardware removal and second-look arthroscopy after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jan;144(1):73-79. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05035-1. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
3
All-epiphyseal versus trans-epiphyseal screw fixation for tillaux fractures: Does it matter?
World J Orthop. 2022 Feb 18;13(2):131-138. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.131.
4
Improvement in Functional Outcomes After Elective Symptomatic Orthopaedic Implant Removal.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Sep;4(9):e20.00137. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00137.
5
Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2020 May 25;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s10195-020-00547-7.
7
Complications of implant removal in ankle fractures.
J Orthop. 2019 Feb 28;16(3):191-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.017. eCollection 2019 May-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The benefits of implant removal from the foot and ankle.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):1316-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01756.
2
Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 May 24;9:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-73.
3
Orthopaedic implants in children: survey results regarding routine removal by the pediatric and nonpediatric specialists.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4):510-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000214924.02939.62.
5
Ankle fractures and syndesmosis injuries.
Orthop Clin North Am. 2001 Jan;32(1):79-90. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70195-4.
7
Knee pain after intramedullary tibial nailing: its incidence, etiology, and outcome.
J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Feb-Mar;11(2):103-5. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199702000-00006.
8
Knee pain after tibial nailing.
J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Jan;11(1):10-3. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199701000-00004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验