Wesleyan University.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Nov;125(8):1158-1165. doi: 10.1037/abn0000207.
A persistent challenge for the field of psychopathology has been how to best explain mental disorders and organize clinical symptoms into diagnoses. Meta-structural approaches have clarified fundamental problems and made substantial gains by using covariance structures to organize the nature of clinical symptom patterns. A remaining task is how to specify the connections between these patterns across behavioral, cognitive, and neural mechanisms. Together, meta-structural approaches and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) offer a means to parse out these connections. I comment on the included articles in this special section on psychopathology meta-structure and argue that core dimensions of psychopathology identified with meta-structural approaches can advance the RDoC initiative and that the RDoC framework, in turn, can strengthen structural approaches by providing an organizational scaffold to elucidate the relations of behavioral, cognitive, and neural mechanisms and to relate them to dimensions of human suffering and dysfunction. (PsycINFO Database Record
精神病理学领域一直面临的一个挑战是如何最好地解释精神障碍,并将临床症状组织成诊断。元结构方法通过使用协方差结构来组织临床症状模式的本质,澄清了基本问题并取得了实质性进展。剩下的任务是如何指定这些模式在行为、认知和神经机制之间的联系。元结构方法和美国国立精神卫生研究所(NIMH)研究领域标准(RDoC)一起为解析这些联系提供了一种手段。我评论了这个精神病理学元结构特刊中的文章,认为元结构方法确定的精神病理学核心维度可以推进 RDoC 计划,而 RDoC 框架反过来可以通过提供一个组织框架来加强结构方法,以阐明行为、认知和神经机制的关系,并将它们与人类痛苦和功能障碍的维度联系起来。