• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对影响女性分娩偏好因素的全面系统综述。

A comprehensive systematic review of factors influencing women's birthing preferences.

作者信息

Bt Maznin Nur Liyanna, Creedy Debra Kay

机构信息

1. The Singapore National University Hospital (NUH) Centre for Evidence-Based Nursing: A Collaborating Centre of The Joanna Briggs Institute, Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore.

出版信息

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(4):232-306. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-46.

DOI:10.11124/jbisrir-2012-46
PMID:27819971
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although many women prefer a vaginal birth, caesarean deliveries have risen dramatically, reaching more than 50% in some countries, despite a lack of evidence of any increase in obstetric emergencies. Some authors concluded that maternal request is a significant factor in the rising caesarean section rates. There is a need to examine factors that influence women's birthing preferences for normal vaginal birth or caesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to identify factors influencing women's birthing preferences.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Studies that involved women with low-obstetric risk, who have given birth at term or were going to give birth.This review considered studies that investigated women's experience of birth and factors influencing women's birth preferences for mode of delivery, excluding preference for place of birth.This review considered studies indicating women's preference for vaginal birth, caesarean section and vaginal birth after caesarean; factors influencing birth preference; and subjective accounts of childbirth during the antenatal period or first postpartum year.This review included quantitative descriptive survey studies and qualitative studies that examined women's childbirth preferences.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search was limited to English language reports from 1990 to 2009. A three step strategy to search for relevant articles was undertaken.

METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY

Papers selected were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using critical appraisal instruments from Joanna Briggs Institute.

DATA EXTRACTION

Quantitative and qualitative data were extracted using standardised data extraction tools from Joanna Briggs Institute.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A narrative summary was done for quantitative studies while qualitative findings were pooled into a meta-synthesis.

RESULTS

The qualitative meta-synthesis identified three major factors influencing women's birth preferences which were: fear of childbirth that relates to safety, pain, and the rate of recovery of childbirth; sources of information obtained for decision-making, and women's expectations and reality of the birthing body.The quantitative papers reported similar findings including concerns about safety, fear of pain, and previous negative birth experiences. A faster recovery and the wish for a natural childbirth were reasons for women preferring a vaginal birth and vaginal birth after caesarean.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of the mode of birth preferred by women, issues of safety, fear, rate of recovery, expectations of childbirth, and information received from health professionals, were influential factors in these women's decisions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Women's concerns need to be addressed through supportive counselling and health professionals need to provide information regarding childbirth to families in light of their influence on women's decisions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Few studies have reported on long term implications of caesarean section and women's decision making on childbirth choices. Future studies could evaluate the effectiveness of counselling and educational interventions in lowering the rate of caesarean section without medical indications and monitoring the emotional wellbeing of women.

摘要

背景

尽管许多女性更倾向于顺产,但剖宫产率仍急剧上升,在一些国家已超过50%,尽管并无证据表明产科急症有所增加。一些作者认为,产妇的要求是剖宫产率上升的一个重要因素。有必要研究影响女性对顺产或剖宫产分娩方式偏好的因素。

目的

本系统评价的目的是确定影响女性分娩偏好的因素。

纳入标准

涉及低产科风险、足月分娩或即将分娩的女性的研究。本评价纳入调查女性分娩经历以及影响女性对分娩方式偏好的因素的研究,不包括对分娩地点的偏好。本评价纳入表明女性对顺产、剖宫产及剖宫产后顺产的偏好;影响分娩偏好的因素;以及孕期或产后第一年对分娩的主观描述的研究。本评价包括定量描述性调查研究和研究女性分娩偏好的定性研究。

检索策略

检索限于1990年至2009年的英文报告。采用三步策略检索相关文章。

方法学质量

在纳入评价之前,由两名独立评审员使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评价工具对所选论文的方法学有效性进行评估。

数据提取

使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的标准化数据提取工具提取定量和定性数据。

数据综合

对定量研究进行叙述性总结,而定性研究结果则汇总进行元综合。

结果

定性元综合确定了影响女性分娩偏好的三个主要因素,即:与分娩安全、疼痛及恢复速度相关的分娩恐惧;用于决策的信息来源;以及女性对分娩身体的期望与现实。定量研究报告了类似的结果,包括对安全的担忧、对疼痛的恐惧以及既往不良分娩经历。恢复较快以及希望自然分娩是女性更倾向于顺产及剖宫产后顺产的原因。

结论

无论女性偏好何种分娩方式,安全、恐惧、恢复速度、分娩期望以及从医护人员处获得的信息等问题都是影响这些女性决策的因素。

对实践的启示

需要通过支持性咨询来解决女性的担忧,医护人员需要根据其对女性决策的影响,向家庭提供有关分娩的信息。

对研究的启示

很少有研究报告剖宫产的长期影响以及女性在分娩选择上的决策。未来的研究可以评估咨询和教育干预措施在降低无医学指征剖宫产率以及监测女性情绪健康方面的效果。

相似文献

1
A comprehensive systematic review of factors influencing women's birthing preferences.对影响女性分娩偏好因素的全面系统综述。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(4):232-306. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-46.
2
Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.支持剖宫产术后孕妇做出分娩方式决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;2013(7):CD010041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2.
3
Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.背后的真相——在不存在医学或产科因素的情况下,很少有女性选择剖宫产。
Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
4
What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review.女性的分娩方式偏好及其原因是什么?系统范围综述。
Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):323-333. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Factors that Influence Women's Decision on the Mode of Birth After a Previous Caesarean Section: A Meta-ethnography.影响剖宫产后再次分娩方式选择的因素:荟萃元分析。
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2023 Jul;11(3):152-168. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2023.97229.2171.
6
Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.中国妇女、家庭成员和卫生专业人员选择剖宫产的流行情况及原因:一项混合方法系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2018 Oct 16;15(10):e1002672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002672. eCollection 2018 Oct.
7
Factors associated with Chinese nulliparous women's choices of mode of delivery: A longitudinal study.与中国初产妇分娩方式选择相关的因素:一项纵向研究。
Midwifery. 2018 Jul;62:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
8
What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.在英国,对于怀孕过程顺利的健康女性而言,是什么影响了她们对分娩地点的偏好、选择和决策?一项采用“最佳匹配”框架方法的定性证据综合分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1279-7.
9
Women's decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study.台湾地区剖宫产后再次分娩时产妇决策过程及其影响因素的定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 17;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1661-0.
10
Women's perspectives on health facility and system levels factors influencing mode of delivery in Tehran: a qualitative study.女性对德黑兰影响分娩方式的卫生机构和系统层面因素的看法:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2019 Feb 8;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0680-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for childbirth delivery and pain relief methods among pregnant women in Vietnam.越南孕妇对分娩方式及疼痛缓解方法的偏好
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 30;11:1290232. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1290232. eCollection 2024.
2
Vaginal Birth at Term - Part 1. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/083, December 2020).足月阴道分娩 - 第1部分。德国妇产科学会、奥地利妇产科学会和瑞士妇产科学会指南(S3级,德国医学和科学信息平台注册号015/083,2020年12月)
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Nov 3;82(11):1143-1193. doi: 10.1055/a-1904-6546. eCollection 2022 Nov.