Coxon Kirstie, Chisholm Alison, Malouf Reem, Rowe Rachel, Hollowell Jennifer
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St. George's, University of London, 6th Floor, Hunter Wing, St George's Campus, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1279-7.
English maternity care policy has supported offering women choice of birth setting for over twenty years, but only 13% of women in England currently give birth in settings other than obstetric units (OUs). It is unclear why uptake of non-OU settings for birth remains relatively low. This paper presents a synthesis of qualitative evidence which explores influences on women's experiences of birth place choice, preference and decision-making from the perspectives of women using maternity services.
Qualitative evidence synthesis of UK research published January 1992-March 2015, using a 'best-fit' framework approach. Searches were run in seven electronic data bases applying a comprehensive search strategy. Thematic framework analysis was used to synthesise extracted data from included studies.
Twenty-four papers drawing on twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. The synthesis identified support for the key framework themes. Women's experiences of choosing or deciding where to give birth were influenced by whether they received information about available options and about the right to choose, women's preferences for different services and their attributes, previous birth experiences, views of family, friends and health care professionals and women's beliefs about risk and safety. The synthesis additionally identified that women's access to choice of place of birth during the antenatal period varied. Planning to give birth in OU was straightforward, but although women considering birth in a setting other than hospital OU were sometimes well-supported, they also encountered obstacles and described needing to 'counter the negativity' surrounding home birth or birth in midwife-led settings.
Over the period covered by the review, it was straightforward for low risk women to opt for hospital birth in the UK. Accessing home birth was more complex and contested. The evidence on freestanding midwifery units (FMUs) is more limited, but suggests that women wanting to opt for an FMU birth experienced similar barriers. The extent to which women experienced similar problems accessing alongside midwifery units (AMUs) is unclear. Women's preferences for different birth options, particularly for 'hospital' vs non-hospital settings, are shaped by their pre-existing values, beliefs and experience, and not all women are open to all birth settings.
二十多年来,英国的产妇护理政策一直支持为女性提供分娩地点选择,但目前英格兰只有13%的女性在产科病房(OU)以外的地方分娩。目前尚不清楚为何非产科病房分娩地点的利用率仍然相对较低。本文对定性证据进行了综合分析,从使用产妇服务的女性视角探讨了对女性分娩地点选择、偏好及决策体验的影响因素。
采用“最佳匹配”框架方法,对1992年1月至2015年3月发表的英国研究定性证据进行综合分析。运用全面的检索策略在七个电子数据库中进行检索。采用主题框架分析法对纳入研究中提取的数据进行综合分析。
来自20项研究的24篇论文符合纳入标准。综合分析确定了对关键框架主题的支持。女性选择或决定分娩地点的体验受到以下因素影响:她们是否获得了关于可用选项及选择权的信息、女性对不同服务及其属性的偏好、既往分娩经历、家人、朋友及医护人员的观点,以及女性对风险和安全的信念。综合分析还发现,女性在孕期获得分娩地点选择的机会各不相同。计划在产科病房分娩很简单,但尽管考虑在医院产科病房以外的地方分娩的女性有时能得到很好的支持,但她们也遇到了障碍,并表示需要“应对”围绕在家分娩或由助产士主导的分娩环境的负面看法。
在本综述涵盖的时间段内,英国低风险女性选择在医院分娩很简单。选择在家分娩则更为复杂且存在争议。关于独立助产单元(FMU)的证据更为有限,但表明希望选择在独立助产单元分娩的女性也遇到了类似障碍。女性在使用助产士附属单元(AMU)时遇到类似问题的程度尚不清楚。女性对不同分娩选项的偏好,尤其是对“医院”与非医院环境的偏好,是由她们先前的价值观、信念和经历塑造的,并非所有女性都对所有分娩环境持开放态度。