• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

死产的病因分类:一项病例对照研究。

Aetiological Classification of Stillbirths: A Case Control Study.

作者信息

Kumbhare Sonal A, Maitra Nandita K

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat India.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Dec;66(6):420-425. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0695-8. Epub 2015 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s13224-015-0695-8
PMID:27821981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5080212/
Abstract

ABSTRACT

Antepartum stillbirths are a major contributor to perinatal mortality. This study was undertaken to assess the role of the ReCoDe (relevant condition at birth) classification system in evaluation of stillbirths in a tertiary teaching hospital in Central Gujarat.

AIM

To determine etiology of stillbirths using the ReCoDe classification system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective case control study over a period of 1 year from September 1st, 2012 to August 31st, 2013. Sample size was calculated as 243 cases and 486 controls. Two controls (live births) per case were matched for gestational age and birth weight. Odd's ratios with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Maternal age and parity that appeared to be highly significant factors on univariate analysis were not found to be independent risk factors with multivariate logistic regression. Gestational age and birth weight were not statistically significant risk factors. Other risk factors like previous stillbirth (26.13; 95 % CI 3.23-211.29), antepartum hemorrhage (11.63; 95 % CI 3.83-35.30), and hypertensive disorders (2.09; 95 % CI 1.20-3.63) were found to be highly significant independent risk factors. Major congenital anomaly ( < 0.001), birth asphyxia ( = 0.0037), cord accidents ( = 0.0037), and rupture uterus ( = 0.001) were also highly significant.

CONCLUSION

The stillbirth rate was 87.83 per 1000 live births. The ReCoDe primary classification system enabled 74.1 % of the cases to be assigned a relevant condition, leaving only 25.9 % as unexplained. The single largest condition associated was fetal growth restriction (25.9 %).

摘要

摘要

产前死产是围产期死亡的主要原因。本研究旨在评估ReCoDe(出生时相关状况)分类系统在古吉拉特邦中部一家三级教学医院评估死产中的作用。

目的

使用ReCoDe分类系统确定死产的病因。

材料与方法

这是一项前瞻性病例对照研究,时间跨度为2012年9月1日至2013年8月31日的1年。样本量计算为243例病例和486例对照。每例病例匹配两个对照(活产),匹配孕周和出生体重。使用多因素逻辑回归计算比值比及95%置信区间。

结果

单因素分析中似乎具有高度显著意义的产妇年龄和产次,在多因素逻辑回归中未被发现是独立危险因素。孕周和出生体重不是具有统计学意义的危险因素。其他危险因素,如既往死产(26.13;95%CI 3.23 - 211.29)、产前出血(11.63;95%CI 3.83 - 35.30)和高血压疾病(2.09;95%CI 1.20 - 3.63)被发现是高度显著的独立危险因素。严重先天性异常(<0.001)、出生窒息(=0.0037)、脐带意外(=0.0037)和子宫破裂(=0.001)也具有高度显著性。

结论

死产率为每1000例活产87.83例。ReCoDe主要分类系统使74.1%的病例能够被归类到相关状况,仅有25.9%原因不明。与之相关的最主要状况是胎儿生长受限(25.9%)。

相似文献

1
Aetiological Classification of Stillbirths: A Case Control Study.死产的病因分类:一项病例对照研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Dec;66(6):420-425. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0695-8. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
2
A comparison of the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand-Perinatal Death Classification system and relevant condition at death stillbirth classification systems.澳大利亚和新西兰围产期协会围产期死亡分类系统与相关死产死亡状况分类系统的比较。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Oct;49(5):467-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01066.x.
3
Still Birth classification: Application of Relevant Condition at Death (ReCoDe) classification system in a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan.死产分类:巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院中相关死亡情况(ReCoDe)分类系统的应用。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Jan-Feb;38(1):133-137. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.1.4470.
4
Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study.根据死亡相关情况对死产进行分类(ReCoDe):基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1113-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38629.587639.7C. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
5
Risk factors for antepartum stillbirth: a case-control study in Nepal.产前死产的危险因素:尼泊尔的一项病例对照研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Jul 5;15:146. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0567-3.
6
Decoding stillbirths using the Relevant Condition at Death classification: Study from the developing world.使用死亡相关状况分类法解读死产情况:来自发展中世界的研究
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2019 May 28;20(2):106-116. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0080. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
7
Causes and Demographic Factors Affecting Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Centre in India.印度一家三级医疗中心影响死产的原因及人口统计学因素
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022 Jun;72(3):225-235. doi: 10.1007/s13224-021-01571-1. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
8
Reducing perinatal mortality in Vila Central Hospital, Vanuatu.降低瓦努阿图中央医院的围产期死亡率。
P N G Med J. 1994 Sep;37(3):178-80.
9
Predictors of term stillbirths in an inner-city maternity hospital in Lagos, Nigeria.尼日利亚拉各斯一家市中心妇产医院足月死产的预测因素
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(11):1243-51. doi: 10.3109/00016340903287474.
10
Still births in a Hausa community.豪萨族社区的死产情况。
J Pak Med Assoc (1951). 1982 Jul;32(7):156-62.

引用本文的文献

1
An Analysis of Cause of Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Delhi: A Contribution to the WHO SEARO Project.德里一家三级护理医院死产原因分析:对世界卫生组织西太平洋区域办事处项目的贡献
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019 Apr;69(2):155-160. doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1161-1. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Late stillbirth: a ten year cohort study.晚期死产:一项十年队列研究。
Acta Med Port. 2013 Jan-Feb;26(1):39-42. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
2
National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis.2009 年全球、区域和各国的死产发生率估计数及其自 1995 年以来的变化趋势:系统分析。
Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1319-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62310-0.
3
Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高收入国家中导致死产的主要风险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1331-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62233-7.
4
Recurrence risk of stillbirth in a second pregnancy.二胎再次发生死胎的风险。
BJOG. 2010 Sep;117(10):1243-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02641.x. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
5
An evaluation of classification systems for stillbirth.死产分类系统的评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Jun 19;9:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-24.
6
Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: a systematic review.产妇年龄与死产风险:一项系统综述。
CMAJ. 2008 Jan 15;178(2):165-72. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070150.
7
Recurrent stillbirths: a matched case-control study of unexplained stillbirths at term.复发性死产:足月不明原因死产的配对病例对照研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Apr;26(3):205-7. doi: 10.1080/01443610500508303.
8
Higher rate of stillbirth at the extremes of reproductive age: a large nationwide sample of deliveries in the United States.育龄两端死产率较高:美国全国范围内大量分娩样本研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):840-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.038.
9
Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study.根据死亡相关情况对死产进行分类(ReCoDe):基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1113-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38629.587639.7C. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
10
Sex, birth weight, and the risk of stillbirth in Scotland, 1980-1996.1980 - 1996年苏格兰的性别、出生体重与死产风险
Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Mar 15;151(6):614-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010249.