Richardson Michael G, Lopez Brandon M, Baysinger Curtis L, Shotwell Matthew S, Chestnut David H
From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; and †Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):548-553. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001680.
Evidence on the analgesic effectiveness of nitrous oxide for labor pain is limited. Even fewer studies have looked at patient satisfaction. Although nitrous oxide appears less effective than neuraxial analgesia, it is unclear whether labor analgesic effectiveness is the most important factor in patient satisfaction. We sought to compare the relationship between analgesic effectiveness and patient satisfaction with analgesia in women who delivered vaginally using nitrous oxide, neuraxial analgesia (epidural or combined spinal-epidural [CSE]), or both (neuraxial after a trial of nitrous oxide).
A standardized survey was recorded on the first postpartum day for all women who received anesthetic care for labor and delivery. Data were queried for women who delivered vaginally with nitrous oxide and/or neuraxial labor analgesia over a 34-month period in 2011 to 2014. Parturients with complete data for analgesia quality and patient satisfaction were included. Analgesia and satisfaction scores were grouped into 8 to 10 high, 5 to 7 intermediate, and 0 to 4 low. These scores were compared with the use of ordinal logistic regression across 3 groups: nitrous oxide alone, epidural or CSE alone, or nitrous oxide followed by neuraxial (epidural or CSE) analgesia.
A total of 6507 women received anesthesia care and delivered vaginally. Complete data were available for 6242 (96%) women; 5261 (81%) chose neuraxial analgesia and 1246 (19%) chose nitrous oxide. Of the latter, 753 (60%) went on to deliver with nitrous oxide alone, and 493 (40%) switched to neuraxial analgesia. Most parturients who received neuraxial analgesia (>90%) reported high analgesic effectiveness. Those who used nitrous oxide alone experienced variable analgesic effectiveness, with only one-half reporting high effectiveness. Among all women who reported poor analgesia effectiveness (0-4; n = 257), those who received nitrous oxide alone were more likely to report high satisfaction (8-10) than women who received epidural analgesia alone (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.4-4.5; P = .002). Women who reported moderate analgesia (5-7) and received nitrous oxide only were more likely to report high satisfaction compared with the other groups. Among women who reported a high level of analgesic effectiveness, satisfaction with anesthesia was high and not different among groups.
Patients who received nitrous oxide alone were as likely to express satisfaction with anesthesia care as those who received neuraxial analgesia, even though they were less likely to report excellent analgesia. Although pain relief contributes to the satisfaction with labor analgesia care, our results suggest that analgesia is not the only contributor to maternal satisfaction.
关于氧化亚氮用于分娩镇痛有效性的证据有限。研究患者满意度的更少。尽管氧化亚氮似乎不如神经轴索镇痛有效,但尚不清楚分娩镇痛有效性是否是患者满意度的最重要因素。我们试图比较使用氧化亚氮、神经轴索镇痛(硬膜外或腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉 [CSE])或两者皆用(在试用氧化亚氮后使用神经轴索镇痛)的阴道分娩女性的镇痛有效性与镇痛患者满意度之间的关系。
在产后第一天为所有接受分娩麻醉护理的女性记录一份标准化调查问卷。查询2011年至2014年34个月期间使用氧化亚氮和/或神经轴索分娩镇痛进行阴道分娩的女性的数据。纳入镇痛质量和患者满意度数据完整的产妇。镇痛和满意度评分分为8至10分为高、5至7分为中、0至4分为低。使用有序逻辑回归对三组进行比较:单独使用氧化亚氮、单独使用硬膜外或CSE、或氧化亚氮后使用神经轴索(硬膜外或CSE)镇痛。
共有6507名女性接受了麻醉护理并进行阴道分娩。6242名(96%)女性有完整数据;5261名(81%)选择神经轴索镇痛,1246名(19%)选择氧化亚氮。在后者中,753名(60%)继续仅使用氧化亚氮分娩,493名(40%)改用神经轴索镇痛。大多数接受神经轴索镇痛的产妇(>90%)报告镇痛效果高。仅使用氧化亚氮者的镇痛效果各异,只有一半报告效果高。在所有报告镇痛效果差(0 - 4分;n = 257)的女性中,仅使用氧化亚氮者比仅接受硬膜外镇痛者更有可能报告高满意度(8 - 10分)(比值比2.5;95%置信区间1.4 - 4.5;P = 0.002)。报告中度镇痛(5 - 7分)且仅使用氧化亚氮的女性与其他组相比更有可能报告高满意度。在报告镇痛效果高的女性中麻醉满意度高且组间无差异。
仅接受氧化亚氮的患者与接受神经轴索镇痛的患者对麻醉护理的满意度相同,尽管他们报告极佳镇痛效果的可能性较小。虽然疼痛缓解有助于分娩镇痛护理的满意度,但我们的结果表明镇痛并非产妇满意度的唯一因素。