Exploring the medicalisation of childbirth through women's preferences for and use of pain relief.

BACKGROUND

Sweden, along with other countries, is facing rising intrapartum intervention rates.

AIM

To explore the medicalisation of childbirth through women's preferences for and use of pain relief, and to investigate whether the presence of a birth plan had any impact on use of pain relief, rate of intervention, and satisfaction with the birth experience.

METHODS

The study was cross-sectional, and included 129 women with birth plans and 110 without, all of whom gave birth in one hospital in Sweden between March and June 2016. Data from birth plans and medical records was analysed through descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

FINDINGS

Parity rather than birth plan was a greater determinant for use of pain relief, frequency of interventions, and level of satisfaction; primiparas used more pain relief, had more interventions, and were less satisfied with their birth experiences than multiparas. Epidural analgesia was associated with a two to threefold increase in interventions, but 79.5% of all women had some form of intervention during birth, regardless of having an epidural or not. Women were generally highly satisfied with their birth experiences, women without epidural analgesia and interventions slightly more so.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to their initial plans, especially primiparas used more pharmacological pain relief than intended, and nearly all (94.6%) had some form of intervention during labour and birth. More interventions were associated with lower levels of satisfaction. The high rate of intervention in a healthy population of birthing women is disquieting and requires further attention.