Chen Fu-An, Chien Chih-Chiang, Chen Yu-Wei, Wu Yu-Te, Lin Chih-Ching
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Internal Medicine, National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Yi-Lan, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0166362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166362. eCollection 2016.
Vascular access failure is a huge burden for patients undergoing hemodialysis. Many efforts have been made to maintain vascular access patency, including pharmacotherapy. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), and calcium channel blocker (CCB) are known for their antihypertensive and cardio-protective effects, however, their effects on long-term vascular access patency are still inconclusive.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: We retrospectively enrolled patients commencing maintenance hemodialysis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2006 by using National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Primary patency was defined as the date of first arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) creation to the time of access thrombosis or any intervention aimed to maintain or re-establish vascular access patency. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust the influences of patient characteristics, co-morbidities and medications.
Total 42244 patients were enrolled in this study, 37771 (89.4%) used AVF, 4473 (10.6%) used AVG as their first long term dialysis access. ACE-I, ARB, and CCB use were all associated with prolonged primary patency of AVF [hazard ratio (HR) 0.586, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.557-0.616 for ACE-I use; HR 0.532, CI 0.508-0.556 for ARB use; HR 0.485, CI 0.470-0.501 for CCB use] and AVG (HR 0.557, CI 0.482-0.643 for ACE-I use, HR 0.536, CI 0.467-0.614 for ARB use, HR 0.482, CI 0.442-0.526 for CCB use).
In our analysis, ACE-I, ARB, and CCB were strongly associated with prolonged primary patency of both AVF and AVG. Further prospective randomized studies are still warranted to prove the causality.
血管通路失败对于接受血液透析的患者而言是巨大负担。为维持血管通路通畅已做出诸多努力,包括药物治疗。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-I)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)和钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)因其降压及心脏保护作用而闻名,然而,它们对长期血管通路通畅性的影响仍无定论。
设计、研究地点、参与者与测量方法:我们利用台湾地区国民健康保险研究数据库,回顾性纳入了2000年1月1日至2006年12月31日开始维持性血液透析的患者。主要通畅性定义为首次动静脉内瘘(AVF)或动静脉移植物(AVG)建立之日起至通路血栓形成之时或任何旨在维持或重建血管通路通畅性的干预措施的时间。采用Cox比例风险模型来调整患者特征、合并症及药物的影响。
本研究共纳入42244例患者,37771例(89.4%)使用AVF,4473例(10.6%)使用AVG作为其首个长期透析通路。使用ACE-I、ARB和CCB均与AVF的主要通畅时间延长相关[使用ACE-I时,风险比(HR)为0.586,95%置信区间(CI)为0.557 - 0.616;使用ARB时,HR为0.532,CI为0.508 - 0.556;使用CCB时,HR为0.485,CI为0.470 - 0.501],与AVG的情况相同[使用ACE-I时,HR为0.557,CI为0.482 - 0.643;使用ARB时,HR为0.536,CI为0.467 - 0.614;使用CCB时,HR为0.482,CI为0.442 - 0.526]。
在我们的分析中,ACE-I、ARB和CCB均与AVF和AVG的主要通畅时间延长密切相关。仍需进一步的前瞻性随机研究来证实因果关系。