• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部亲和力与微笑能促进合作,但对道德惩罚没有直接影响。

Facial Likability and Smiling Enhance Cooperation, but Have No Direct Effect on Moralistic Punishment.

作者信息

Mieth Laura, Bell Raoul, Buchner Axel

机构信息

1 Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2016 Sep;63(5):263-277. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000338.

DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000338
PMID:27832736
Abstract

The present study serves to test how positive and negative appearance-based expectations affect cooperation and punishment. Participants played a prisoner's dilemma game with partners who either cooperated or defected. Then they were given a costly punishment option: They could spend money to decrease the payoffs of their partners. Aggregated over trials, participants spent more money for punishing the defection of likable-looking and smiling partners compared to punishing the defection of unlikable-looking and nonsmiling partners, but only because participants were more likely to cooperate with likable-looking and smiling partners, which provided the participants with more opportunities for moralistic punishment. When expressed as a conditional probability, moralistic punishment did not differ as a function of the partners' facial likability. Smiling had no effect on the probability of moralistic punishment, but punishment was milder for smiling in comparison to nonsmiling partners.

摘要

本研究旨在测试基于外貌的积极和消极期望如何影响合作与惩罚。参与者与合作或背叛的伙伴进行囚徒困境游戏。然后他们有一个代价高昂的惩罚选项:他们可以花钱减少伙伴的收益。汇总多次试验结果,与惩罚外貌不可亲和不微笑的伙伴的背叛相比,参与者会花费更多金钱来惩罚外貌可亲且微笑的伙伴的背叛,但这只是因为参与者更有可能与外貌可亲且微笑的伙伴合作,这为参与者提供了更多进行道德惩罚的机会。当表示为条件概率时,道德惩罚并不因伙伴的面部亲和力而有所不同。微笑对道德惩罚的概率没有影响,但与不微笑的伙伴相比,对微笑伙伴的惩罚更轻。

相似文献

1
Facial Likability and Smiling Enhance Cooperation, but Have No Direct Effect on Moralistic Punishment.面部亲和力与微笑能促进合作,但对道德惩罚没有直接影响。
Exp Psychol. 2016 Sep;63(5):263-277. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000338.
2
People punish defection, not failures to conform to the majority.人们惩罚的是背叛,而不是未能从众。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):1211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50414-8.
3
Separating conditional and unconditional cooperation in a sequential Prisoner's Dilemma game.在序贯囚徒困境博弈中区分条件合作和无条件合作。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187952. eCollection 2017.
4
Power Asymmetries and Punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma with Variable Cooperative Investment.具有可变合作投资的囚徒困境中的权力不对称与惩罚
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155773. eCollection 2016.
5
Moral labels increase cooperation and costly punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma game with punishment option.道德标签在具有惩罚选择的囚徒困境博弈中增加合作和昂贵的惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89675-6.
6
Cognitive load decreases cooperation and moral punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma game with punishment option.认知负荷会降低具有惩罚选项的囚徒困境游戏中的合作和道德惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 30;11(1):24500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04217-4.
7
The effect of power asymmetries on cooperation and punishment in a prisoner's dilemma game.权力不对称对囚徒困境博弈中合作与惩罚的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 28;10(1):e0117183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117183. eCollection 2015.
8
Time pressure and deliberation affect moral punishment.时间压力和深思熟虑会影响道德惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67268-3.
9
Consensual punishment does not promote cooperation in the six-person prisoner's dilemma game with noisy public monitoring.在具有嘈杂公共监督的六人囚徒困境博弈中,协商性惩罚并不能促进合作。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188503. eCollection 2017.
10
Communicating emotions, but not expressing them privately, reduces moral punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma game.表达情绪但不私下表达,会减少囚徒困境游戏中的道德惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 6;13(1):14693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41886-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Time pressure and deliberation affect moral punishment.时间压力和深思熟虑会影响道德惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67268-3.
2
People punish defection, not failures to conform to the majority.人们惩罚的是背叛,而不是未能从众。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):1211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50414-8.
3
Communicating emotions, but not expressing them privately, reduces moral punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma game.表达情绪但不私下表达,会减少囚徒困境游戏中的道德惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 6;13(1):14693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41886-9.
4
Perceiver and target partisanship shift facial trustworthiness effects on likability.感知者和目标党派转移对面部可信度的影响,从而影响喜好度。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 15;13(1):6130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33307-8.
5
Being Negatively Cued, are People Less Cooperative? The Influence of Watching Eyes on Cooperative Behavior.被消极暗示,人们的合作意愿会降低吗?注视的眼睛对合作行为的影响。
Evol Psychol. 2022 Oct-Dec;20(4):14747049221140302. doi: 10.1177/14747049221140302.
6
Enhanced source memory for cheaters with higher resemblance to own-culture typical faces.对与自身文化典型面孔相似度更高的作弊者的源记忆增强。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Apr;30(2):700-711. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02177-y. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
7
Cognitive load decreases cooperation and moral punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma game with punishment option.认知负荷会降低具有惩罚选项的囚徒困境游戏中的合作和道德惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 30;11(1):24500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04217-4.
8
Moral labels increase cooperation and costly punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma game with punishment option.道德标签在具有惩罚选择的囚徒困境博弈中增加合作和昂贵的惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89675-6.
9
Separating conditional and unconditional cooperation in a sequential Prisoner's Dilemma game.在序贯囚徒困境博弈中区分条件合作和无条件合作。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187952. eCollection 2017.