• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺X线胶片冲洗机温度、显影时间及化学药剂:对剂量、对比度和噪声的影响

Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise.

作者信息

Kimme-Smith C, Rothschild P A, Bassett L W, Gold R H, Moler C

机构信息

Department of Radiological Sciences, Iris Cantor Mammography Screening Center, UCLA School of Medicine 90024-1721.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 Jan;152(1):35-40. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.1.35.

DOI:10.2214/ajr.152.1.35
PMID:2783288
Abstract

Six different combinations of film-processor temperature (33.3 degrees C, 35 degrees C), development time (22 sec, 44 sec), and chemistry (Du Pont medium contrast developer [MCD] and Kodak rapid process [RP] developer) were each evaluated by separate analyses with Hurter and Driffield curves, test images of plastic step wedges, noise variance analysis, and phantom images; each combination also was evaluated clinically. Du Pont MCD chemistry produced greater contrast than did Kodak RP chemistry. A change in temperature from 33.3 degrees C (92 degrees F) to 35 degrees C (95 degrees F) had the least effect on dose and image contrast. Temperatures of 36.7 degrees C (98 degrees F) and 38.3 degrees C (101 degrees F) also were tested with extended processing. The speed increased for 36.7 degrees C but decreased at 38.3 degrees C. Base plus fog increased, but contrast decreased for these higher temperatures. Increasing development time had the greatest effect on decreasing the dose required for equivalent film darkening when imaging BR12 breast equivalent test objects; ion chamber measurements showed a 32% reduction in dose when the development time was increased from 22 to 44 sec. Although noise variance doubled in images processed with the extended development time, diagnostic capability was not compromised. Extending the processing time for mammographic films was an effective method of dose reduction, whereas varying the processing temperature and chemicals had less effect on contrast and dose.

摘要

对胶片冲洗机温度(33.3摄氏度、35摄氏度)、显影时间(22秒、44秒)和化学药剂(杜邦中对比度显影剂[MCD]和柯达快速冲洗[RP]显影剂)的六种不同组合,分别通过赫特和德里菲尔德曲线分析、塑料阶梯楔测试图像、噪声方差分析和体模图像进行评估;每种组合也进行了临床评估。杜邦MCD化学药剂产生的对比度比柯达RP化学药剂更高。温度从33.3摄氏度(92华氏度)变为35摄氏度(95华氏度)对剂量和图像对比度的影响最小。还对36.7摄氏度(98华氏度)和38.3摄氏度(101华氏度)的温度进行了延长冲洗测试。36.7摄氏度时速度增加,但38.3摄氏度时速度降低。对于这些较高温度,片基加灰雾增加,但对比度降低。在对BR12乳腺等效测试物体成像时,增加显影时间对降低等效胶片黑化所需剂量的影响最大;电离室测量显示,当显影时间从22秒增加到44秒时,剂量降低了32%。尽管延长显影时间处理的图像中噪声方差增加了一倍,但诊断能力并未受到影响。延长乳腺摄影胶片的冲洗时间是一种有效的剂量降低方法,而改变冲洗温度和化学药剂对对比度和剂量的影响较小。

相似文献

1
Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise.乳腺X线胶片冲洗机温度、显影时间及化学药剂:对剂量、对比度和噪声的影响
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 Jan;152(1):35-40. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.1.35.
2
Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.增加乳腺摄影胶片处理时间以降低辐射剂量的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Dec;155(6):1189-93. doi: 10.2214/ajr.155.6.2122664.
3
Increased radiation dose at mammography due to prolonged exposure, delayed processing, and increased film darkening.由于曝光时间延长、处理延迟和胶片变黑加剧,乳腺摄影时辐射剂量增加。
Radiology. 1991 Feb;178(2):387-91. doi: 10.1148/radiology.178.2.1987598.
4
Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.显影液温度变化对牙科胶片射线照相对比度和相对胶片感光度的影响。
J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1990 Dec;45(12):525-8.
5
The influence of film processing temperature and time on mammographic image quality.胶片冲洗温度和时间对乳腺X线摄影图像质量的影响。
Br J Radiol. 1993 Aug;66(788):685-90. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-788-685.
6
Evaluation of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid film processing system.新型超快速胶片冲洗系统冲洗出的X光片评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 May;154(5):1107-10. doi: 10.2214/ajr.154.5.2108553.
7
Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.两种乳腺钼靶胶片的图像质量及乳腺平均吸收剂量比较。
Acta Radiol. 1993 Jul;34(4):351-5.
8
New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose.新型乳腺钼靶筛查/胶片组合:成像特征与辐射剂量
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Apr;154(4):713-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.154.4.2107663.
9
Densitometric evaluation of four rapid dental film processing solutions.
J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1991 Sep;46(9):467-9.
10
Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality.处理条件对乳腺钼靶图像质量的影响。
Acad Radiol. 1999 Aug;6(8):464-70. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(99)80165-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Light sensitometry of mammography films at varying development temperatures and times.在不同显影温度和时间下对乳腺摄影胶片进行感光度测定
J Med Phys. 2012 Jan;37(1):40-5. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.92719.