• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种乳腺钼靶胶片的图像质量及乳腺平均吸收剂量比较。

Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.

作者信息

Persliden J, Fransson V, Vitak B, Fagerberg G

机构信息

Department of Radiation Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 1993 Jul;34(4):351-5.

PMID:8318296
Abstract

A film intended for mammography (Kodak SO 155 MRH-1) was tested and compared to one (Kodak SO 177 Ortho M) used earlier. Both films including the cassette could resolve 20 lp/mm. For a processing time of 90 s the new film gave the same overall image quality and irradiation dose to the breast as the old system. If, instead, the processing time was increased to 150 s, a 43% reduction in kerma could be attained with the new film. With a developing temperature of 36 degrees C and 150 s processing time, the noise is clinically acceptable. A nonparametric test showed no significant difference between the 2 films on the 0.01 level. At an X-ray tube potential difference of 25 kV, the mean absorbed dose to a 4.5-cm-thick breast was reduced from 1.7 mGy with the old combination to 1.0 mGy with the new one. The measurements were made with a moving grid.

摘要

对一张用于乳腺摄影的胶片(柯达SO 155 MRH - 1)进行了测试,并与之前使用的一张胶片(柯达SO 177 Ortho M)作比较。两张胶片包括暗盒都能分辨20线对/毫米。在90秒的显影时间下,新胶片给出的乳腺整体图像质量和照射剂量与旧系统相同。相反,如果将显影时间增加到150秒,使用新胶片可使比释动能降低43%。在36摄氏度的显影温度和150秒的显影时间下,噪声在临床上是可接受的。一项非参数检验显示,在0.01水平上,这两张胶片之间没有显著差异。在X射线管电势差为25 kV时,4.5厘米厚乳腺的平均吸收剂量从旧组合的1.7毫戈瑞降至新组合的1.0毫戈瑞。测量是使用活动滤线栅进行的。

相似文献

1
Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.两种乳腺钼靶胶片的图像质量及乳腺平均吸收剂量比较。
Acta Radiol. 1993 Jul;34(4):351-5.
2
Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise.乳腺X线胶片冲洗机温度、显影时间及化学药剂:对剂量、对比度和噪声的影响
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 Jan;152(1):35-40. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.1.35.
3
Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.增加乳腺摄影胶片处理时间以降低辐射剂量的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Dec;155(6):1189-93. doi: 10.2214/ajr.155.6.2122664.
4
[Dose measurements during mammography using a grid (author's transl)].使用格栅进行乳房X线摄影时的剂量测量(作者译)
Rofo. 1979 Mar;130(3):351-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1231286.
5
New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose.新型乳腺钼靶筛查/胶片组合:成像特征与辐射剂量
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Apr;154(4):713-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.154.4.2107663.
6
Comparative study of dose values and image quality in mammography in the area of Madrid.
Br J Radiol. 1994 Jun;67(798):556-63. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-798-556.
7
Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
Health Phys. 2008 Apr;94(4):338-44. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000298225.97830.a4.
8
[Radiation exposure in x-ray mammography].[乳腺X线摄影中的辐射暴露]
Rofo. 2001 Feb;173(2):79-91. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-10888.
9
[X-ray examination of the breast (author's transl)].
Rontgenblatter. 1981 Apr;34(4):151-60.
10
Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.非晶硅全视野数字化乳腺摄影的平均腺体剂量——临床结果
Rofo. 2002 Jun;174(6):696-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32221.