Suppr超能文献

利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗老年耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致医院获得性肺炎的回顾性队列分析:利奈唑胺在老年人中的有效性

Linezolid versus vancomycin for nosocomial pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the elderly: A retrospective cohort analysis: Effectiveness of linezolid in the elderly.

作者信息

Takada Hiroaki, Hifumi Toru, Nishimoto Naoki, Kanemura Takashi, Yoshioka Hayato, Okada Ichiro, Kiriu Nobuaki, Inoue Junichi, Koido Yuichi, Kato Hiroshi

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine and Trauma, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, 3256 Midori, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-0014, Japan.

Emergency Medical Center, Kagawa University Hospital, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, Kita, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;35(2):245-248. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.058. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Several reports have compared the efficacy of linezolid (LZD) in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with that of vancomycin (VCM); however, these two antibiotics for the treatment of nosocomial MRSA pneumonia in elderly patients has not been well evaluated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LZD compared with VCM for the treatment of elderly patients with nosocomial MRSA pneumonia in a retrospective chart review of a cohort.

METHODS

We included 28 consecutive patients aged ≥65years hospitalized with a confirmed diagnosis of MRSA pneumonia and treated with LZD (n=11) or VCM (n=17) between November 2010 and May 2015. We collected patient, disease, and laboratory data. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) total, respiratory, renal, coagulation, hepatic, cardiovascular, and central nervous system scores on days 1, 3, 7, and 14.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to baseline characteristics. The 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the LZD group than in the VCM group (0% vs. 41%, P=.02). The SOFA total score on days 3, 7, and 14 were significantly lower those at baseline in the LZD group (P<.05). The SOFA respiratory score on days 14 was also significantly lower than baseline in the LZD group (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

LZD may be more efficacious than VCM for treating elderly patients with nosocomial MRSA pneumonia.

摘要

目的

多项报告比较了利奈唑胺(LZD)与万古霉素(VCM)治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染的疗效;然而,这两种抗生素用于治疗老年患者医院获得性MRSA肺炎的效果尚未得到充分评估。本研究旨在通过对一组病例的回顾性图表分析,评估LZD与VCM治疗老年医院获得性MRSA肺炎患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们纳入了2010年11月至2015年5月期间连续收治的28例年龄≥65岁、确诊为MRSA肺炎并接受LZD(n = 11)或VCM(n = 17)治疗的患者。我们收集了患者、疾病和实验室数据。主要结局是30天死亡率。次要结局是第1、3、7和14天的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)总分、呼吸、肾脏、凝血、肝脏、心血管和中枢神经系统评分。

结果

两组在基线特征方面无显著差异。LZD组的30天死亡率显著低于VCM组(0%对41%,P = 0.02)。LZD组第3、7和14天的SOFA总分显著低于基线水平(P < 0.05)。LZD组第14天的SOFA呼吸评分也显著低于基线水平(P < 0.05)。

结论

LZD治疗老年医院获得性MRSA肺炎患者可能比VCM更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验