McClintock Clayton H, Lau Elsa, Miller Lisa
Department of Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University New York, NY, USA.
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 27;7:1600. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01600. eCollection 2016.
While the field of empirical study on religion and spirituality in relation to mental health has rapidly expanded over the past decade, little is known about underlying dimensions of spirituality cross-culturally conceived. We aimed to bridge this gap by inductively deriving potential universal dimensions of spirituality through a large-scale, multi-national data collection, and examining the relationships of these dimensions with common psychiatric conditions. Five-thousand five-hundred and twelve participants from China, India, and the United States completed a two-hour online survey consisting of wide-ranging measures of the lived experience of spirituality, as well as clinical assessments. A series of inductive Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and cross-validating Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) were conducted to derive common underlying dimensions of spirituality. Logistic regression analyses were then conducted with each dimension to predict depression, suicidal ideation, generalized anxiety, and substance-related disorders. Preliminary EFA results were consistently supported by ESEM findings. Analyses of 40 spirituality measures revealed five invariant factors across countries which were interpreted as five dimensions of universal spiritual experience, specifically: love, in the fabric of relationships and as a sacred reality; unifying interconnectedness, as a sense of energetic oneness with other beings in the universe; altruism, as a commitment beyond the self with care and service; contemplative practice, such as meditation, prayer, yoga, or qigong; and religious and spiritual reflection and commitment, as a life well-examined. Love, interconnectedness, and altruism were associated with less risk of psychopathology for all countries. Religious and spiritual reflection and commitment and contemplative practice were associated with less risk in India and the United States but associated with greater risk in China. Education was directly associated with dimensions of spiritual awareness in India and China but inversely associated with dimensions in the United States. Findings support the notion that spirituality is a universal phenomenon with potentially universal dimensions. These aspects of spirituality may each offer protective effects against psychiatric symptoms and disorders and suggest new directions for treatment.
虽然在过去十年中,宗教与灵性和心理健康相关的实证研究领域迅速扩展,但对于跨文化概念化的灵性潜在维度却知之甚少。我们旨在通过大规模、多国数据收集归纳得出灵性的潜在普遍维度,并研究这些维度与常见精神疾病的关系,以填补这一空白。来自中国、印度和美国的5512名参与者完成了一项两小时的在线调查,该调查包括对灵性生活体验的广泛测量以及临床评估。进行了一系列归纳性探索性因素分析(EFA)和交叉验证性探索性结构方程建模(ESEM),以得出灵性的共同潜在维度。然后对每个维度进行逻辑回归分析,以预测抑郁症、自杀意念、广泛性焦虑症和物质相关障碍。ESEM的结果一致支持了初步的EFA结果。对40项灵性测量指标的分析揭示了各国共有的五个不变因素,这些因素被解释为普遍精神体验的五个维度,具体如下:爱,体现在人际关系中并作为一种神圣的现实;统一的相互联系,作为与宇宙中其他生物的能量合一感;利他主义,作为一种超越自我的关怀和服务承诺;沉思练习,如冥想、祈祷、瑜伽或气功;以及宗教和灵性反思与承诺,作为经过充分审视的生活。在所有国家,爱、相互联系和利他主义与精神病理学风险较低相关。宗教和灵性反思与承诺以及沉思练习在印度和美国与较低风险相关,但在中国与较高风险相关。在印度和中国,教育与灵性意识维度直接相关,但在美国与灵性意识维度呈负相关。研究结果支持了灵性是一种具有潜在普遍维度的普遍现象这一观点。灵性的这些方面可能各自对精神症状和障碍具有保护作用,并为治疗提供新的方向。