Tolan Nicole V, Wockenfus Amy M, Koch Christopher D, Crews Bridgit O, Dietzen Dennis J, Karon Brad S
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, United States; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Clin Biochem. 2017 Mar;50(4-5):168-173. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
Point of care (POC) whole blood lactate testing may facilitate rapid detection of sepsis. We evaluated three POC methods against both plasma lactate comparison methods and a flow-injection mass spectrometric (MS) method.
Nova StatStrip, Abbott i-STAT CG4+ and Radiometer ABL90 POC lactate methods were evaluated against the mean of Cobas Integra 400 and Vitros 350 plasma lactate. POC methods were also compared to a flow-injection mass spectrometric assay measuring lactate in ZnSO-precipitated whole blood extracts. Intra- and inter-assay precision was determined using quality control material. Method comparison included specimens from normal donors at rest, after exertion, and after spiking with lactic acid.
Intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation was <5% for i-STAT and ABL90; but ranged from 3.1-8.2% on two StatStrip meters. Mean (±SD) bias between POC and plasma lactate ranged from -0.2±0.9 (i-STAT and ABL90) to -0.4±1.2 (StatStrip) mmol/L. At concentrations >6mmol/L, all POC methods showed proportional negative bias compared to plasma methods; but this bias was not observed when compared to the MS method. Despite proportional negative bias, all POC methods demonstrated acceptable concordance (94-100%) with plasma lactate within the reference interval (<2.3mmol/L) and >4mmol/L, commonly used clinical cut-offs for detection of sepsis.
POC lactate methods demonstrate acceptable concordance with plasma lactate across commonly used clinical cut-offs for detection of sepsis. Due to systematic negative bias at higher lactate concentrations, POC and plasma lactate should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients with elevated lactate concentrations.
即时检验(POC)全血乳酸检测可能有助于快速检测脓毒症。我们针对血浆乳酸比较方法和流动注射质谱(MS)方法评估了三种POC方法。
将诺瓦StatStrip、雅培i-STAT CG4+和雷度ABL90 POC乳酸方法与Cobas Integra 400和Vitros 350血浆乳酸的均值进行比较评估。POC方法还与一种用于测量硫酸锌沉淀全血提取物中乳酸的流动注射质谱分析法进行比较。使用质控材料确定批内和批间精密度。方法比较包括来自静息状态、运动后以及乳酸加标的正常供体的标本。
i-STAT和ABL90的批内和批间变异系数<5%;但在两台StatStrip仪器上变异系数范围为3.1 - 8.2%。POC与血浆乳酸之间的平均(±标准差)偏差范围为-0.2±0.9(i-STAT和ABL90)至-0.4±1.2(StatStrip)mmol/L。在浓度>6mmol/L时,与血浆方法相比,所有POC方法均显示出比例性负偏差;但与MS方法相比未观察到这种偏差。尽管存在比例性负偏差,但所有POC方法在参考区间(<2.3mmol/L)和>4mmol/L(常用于检测脓毒症的临床临界值)内与血浆乳酸显示出可接受的一致性(94 - 100%)。
POC乳酸方法在常用于检测脓毒症的临床临界值范围内与血浆乳酸显示出可接受的一致性。由于在较高乳酸浓度下存在系统性负偏差,POC和血浆乳酸不应互换使用来监测乳酸浓度升高的患者。