• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于能耐受肠内营养的高危外科创伤 ICU 患者,预防性应用药物性应激性胃炎可能并非必需。

Pharmacologic Stress Gastropathy Prophylaxis May Not Be Necessary in At-Risk Surgical Trauma ICU Patients Tolerating Enteral Nutrition.

机构信息

1 Department of Pharmacy, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

2 Department of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):424-429. doi: 10.1177/0885066616678385. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1177/0885066616678385
PMID:27837045
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Stress gastropathy is a rare complication of the intensive care unit stay with high morbidity and mortality. There are data that support the concept that patients tolerating enteral nutrition have sufficient gut blood flow to obviate the need for prophylaxis; however, no robust studies exist. This study assesses the incidence of clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding in surgical trauma intensive care unit (STICU) patients at risk of stress gastropathy secondary to mechanical ventilation receiving enteral nutrition without pharmacologic prophylaxis.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of records from 2008 to 2013.

SETTING

Adult patients in a single-center STICU were included.

PATIENTS

Patients were included if they received full enteral nutrition while on mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria were coagulopathy, glucocorticoid use, prior-to-admission acid-suppressive therapy use, direct trauma or surgery to the stomach, failure to tolerate goal enteral nutrition, orders to allow natural death, and deviation from the intervention.

INTERVENTION

Pharmacologic stress ulcer prophylaxis was discontinued once enteral nutrition was providing full caloric requirements for patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were included. The median age was 42 years, 83.0% were male, and 96.0% were trauma patients. The incidence of clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding was 0.50%, with a subset analysis of traumatic brain injury patients yielding an incidence of 0.68%. Rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and Clostridium difficile infection were low at 1.0 case/1000 ventilator days and 0.2 events/1000 patient days, respectively. Hospital all-cause mortality was 2.0%. Cost savings of US$121/patient stay were realized.

CONCLUSION

Stress gastropathy is rare in this population. Surgical and trauma patients at risk for stress gastropathy did not benefit from continued pharmacologic prophylaxis once they tolerated enteral nutrition. Pharmacologic prophylaxis may safely be discontinued in this patient population. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether continued prophylaxis after attaining enteral feeding goals is detrimental.

摘要

目的

应激性胃病是重症监护病房的一种罕见并发症,具有较高的发病率和死亡率。有数据支持这样一种观点,即能够耐受肠内营养的患者有足够的肠道血流来避免预防的需要;然而,目前还没有强有力的研究存在。本研究评估了因机械通气而有应激性胃病风险的外科创伤重症监护病房(STICU)患者在接受无药物预防的肠内营养时发生临床显著胃肠道出血的发生率。

设计

对 2008 年至 2013 年期间的记录进行回顾性队列研究。

地点

纳入单中心 STICU 的成年患者。

患者

如果患者在接受机械通气的同时接受全肠内营养,则将其纳入。排除标准为凝血功能障碍、糖皮质激素使用、入院前使用抑酸治疗、胃直接创伤或手术、无法耐受目标肠内营养、允许自然死亡的医嘱和干预措施偏离。

干预措施

一旦肠内营养提供了机械通气患者所需的全部热量,即停止使用药物预防应激性溃疡。

测量和主要结果

共纳入 200 例患者。中位年龄为 42 岁,83.0%为男性,96.0%为创伤患者。临床显著胃肠道出血的发生率为 0.50%,创伤性脑损伤患者的亚组分析显示发生率为 0.68%。呼吸机相关性肺炎和艰难梭菌感染的发生率分别为 1.0 例/1000 呼吸机日和 0.2 例/1000 患者日,均较低。医院全因死亡率为 2.0%。实现了每位患者住院费用节省 121 美元。

结论

在该人群中,应激性胃病很少见。一旦能够耐受肠内营养,有应激性胃病风险的外科和创伤患者就不需要继续使用药物预防。可以安全地停止对这类患者人群使用药物预防。需要进一步调查以确定在达到肠内喂养目标后继续预防是否有害。

相似文献

1
Pharmacologic Stress Gastropathy Prophylaxis May Not Be Necessary in At-Risk Surgical Trauma ICU Patients Tolerating Enteral Nutrition.对于能耐受肠内营养的高危外科创伤 ICU 患者,预防性应用药物性应激性胃炎可能并非必需。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):424-429. doi: 10.1177/0885066616678385. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
2
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the new millennium: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新千年的应激性溃疡预防:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2222-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f17adf.
3
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in intensive care unit patients receiving enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护病房患者接受肠内营养时的应激性溃疡预防:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Jan 28;22(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1937-1.
4
Re-evaluating the Utility of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Critically Ill Patient: A Clinical Scenario-Based Meta-Analysis.重新评估危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的作用:基于临床情景的荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Mar;39(3):408-420. doi: 10.1002/phar.2172. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Children: A Multicenter Observational Study.危重症患儿应激性溃疡预防:一项多中心观察性研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):e107-e113. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002202.
6
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.危重症患者应激性溃疡的预防:一项随机对照试验。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 May-Jun;51(57):757-61.
7
A cluster randomised, crossover, registry-embedded clinical trial of proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2 receptor blockers for ulcer prophylaxis therapy in the intensive care unit (PEPTIC study): study protocol.一项关于质子泵抑制剂与组胺-2受体阻滞剂在重症监护病房预防溃疡治疗中的群组随机、交叉、注册嵌入临床试验(PEPTIC研究):研究方案。
Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Sep;20(3):182-189.
8
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit: an international survey of 97 units in 11 countries.重症监护病房应激性溃疡的预防:对11个国家97个单位的国际调查。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 May;59(5):576-85. doi: 10.1111/aas.12508.
9
Proton pump inhibitors versus histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂用于危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):693-705. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182758734.
10
Stress prophylaxis in intensive care unit patients and the role of enteral nutrition.重症监护病房患者的应激预防与肠内营养的作用。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 Nov;36(6):721-31. doi: 10.1177/0148607112436978. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Variations in Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Practices Among Intensive Care Units in Makkah City Hospitals, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯王国麦加市医院重症监护病房应激性溃疡预防措施的差异
Cureus. 2025 Jul 14;17(7):e87945. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87945. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Research progress on digestive disorders following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后消化系统紊乱的研究进展
Front Immunol. 2024 Dec 20;15:1524495. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1524495. eCollection 2024.
3
Outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury after stress ulcer prophylaxis: a retrospective multicenter study.
应激性溃疡预防治疗后创伤性脑损伤患者的结局:一项回顾性多中心研究
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Feb 23;9(1):e001285. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001285. eCollection 2024.
4
A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of the Use of Enteral Nutrition Plus Pharmacologic Prophylaxis or Enteral Nutrition Alone.肠内营养加药物预防与单纯肠内营养使用情况的回顾性队列分析
Hosp Pharm. 2021 Dec;56(6):729-736. doi: 10.1177/0018578720954159. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
5
Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients.重症监护病房患者应激性溃疡预防措施的审计
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;24(3):160-167. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23368.
6
Effects of oral/enteral nutrition alone versus plus pantoprazole on gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients with low risk factor: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.单独口服/肠内营养与加用泮托拉唑对低危重症患者胃肠道出血的影响:一项多中心、随机对照试验。
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Jun 23;50(4):776-783. doi: 10.3906/sag-1911-42.
7
Use of Enteral Nutrition for Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prophylaxis in the Critically Ill: Review of Current Literature.重症患者胃肠道出血预防中肠内营养的应用:当前文献综述。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2018 Sep;7(3):116-120. doi: 10.1007/s13668-018-0232-3.
8
Do we still need pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis at the ICU?在重症监护病房(ICU)我们仍需要进行药物性应激性溃疡预防吗?
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Nov;9(11):4201-4204. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.121.