Suppr超能文献

抑郁症女性的协作护理:一项系统综述。

Collaborative Care for Women With Depression: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Huang Hsiang, Tabb Karen M, Cerimele Joseph M, Ahmed Nahida, Bhat Amritha, Kester Rachel

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance/Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA.

School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.

出版信息

Psychosomatics. 2017 Jan-Feb;58(1):11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The collaborative care model has been found to be effective for depression management in various primary care populations; however, no review has synthesized trials tailored to treat women.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current evidence for collaborative depression care for women.

METHODOLOGY

We searched for English language articles via MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and reference lists of key articles. Published English language studies were included if they described collaborative care models that targeted women, regardless of study design. Studies were excluded if components of collaborative care were absent (based on criteria described by the Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions Center at the University of Washington), if the focus of the intervention was not women, if the studies were not conducted in primary care or gynecological settings, or if there were no outcome data.

RESULTS

This review resulted in 7 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Included studies were 6 randomized controlled trials and 1 observational study. Among those, 4 studies focused on pregnant or postpartum women. In general, collaborative care interventions focusing on women were more effective than usual care for the management of depressive disorders in women with 5 of the 6 randomized studies showing positive depression outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that collaborative care interventions are effective for treating depressed women in nonmental health settings. Future studies should examine differences in implementation of collaborative care in "real world" settings and define modifications needed based on a woman's reproductive life stage.

摘要

背景

协作护理模式已被证明在各类初级保健人群的抑郁症管理中有效;然而,尚无综述综合针对女性治疗的试验。

目的

本系统综述的目的是评估当前针对女性的协作性抑郁症护理的证据。

方法

我们通过MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆以及关键文章的参考文献列表搜索英文文章。如果已发表的英文研究描述了针对女性的协作护理模式,则纳入研究,无论其研究设计如何。如果缺乏协作护理的组成部分(基于华盛顿大学推进综合心理健康解决方案中心描述的标准)、干预重点不是女性、研究不是在初级保健或妇科环境中进行,或者没有结果数据,则排除这些研究。

结果

本综述产生了7篇符合纳入标准的文章。纳入的研究包括6项随机对照试验和1项观察性研究。其中,4项研究关注孕妇或产后妇女。总体而言,针对女性的协作护理干预在管理女性抑郁症方面比常规护理更有效,6项随机研究中有5项显示出积极的抑郁症治疗结果。

结论

有证据表明协作护理干预在非心理健康环境中治疗抑郁症女性有效。未来的研究应考察“现实世界”环境中协作护理实施的差异,并根据女性的生殖生命阶段确定所需的调整。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验