Grätz Michael, Torche Florencia
Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 1NF, UK.
Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Demography. 2016 Dec;53(6):1883-1904. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0527-1.
Theory and empirical evidence suggest that parents allocate their investments unequally among their children, thus inducing within-family inequality. We investigate whether parents reinforce or compensate for initial ability differences between their children as well as whether these parental responses vary by family socioeconomic status (SES). Using the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) and a twin fixed-effects approach to address unobserved heterogeneity, we find that parental responses to early ability differences between their children do vary by family SES. Contrary to prior findings, we find that advantaged parents provide more cognitive stimulation to higher-ability children, and lower-class parents do not respond to ability differences. No analogous stratification in parental responses to birth weight is found, suggesting that parents' responses vary across domains of child endowments. The reinforcing responses to early ability by high-SES parents do not, however, led to increases in ability differences among children because parental responses have little effect on children's later cognitive performance in this twin sample.
理论和实证证据表明,父母会在子女间不平等地分配他们的投入,从而导致家庭内部的不平等。我们研究父母是强化还是弥补子女之间最初的能力差异,以及这些父母的反应是否因家庭社会经济地位(SES)而异。利用幼儿纵向研究出生队列(ECLS-B)以及双胞胎固定效应方法来解决未观察到的异质性问题,我们发现父母对子女早期能力差异的反应确实因家庭社会经济地位而异。与先前的研究结果相反,我们发现优势家庭的父母会为能力较强的孩子提供更多的认知刺激,而低收入家庭的父母则不会对能力差异做出反应。在父母对出生体重的反应中未发现类似的分层现象,这表明父母的反应在孩子禀赋的不同领域存在差异。然而,高社会经济地位父母对早期能力的强化反应并未导致孩子之间能力差异的增加,因为在这个双胞胎样本中,父母的反应对孩子后期的认知表现影响甚微。