• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三角形植入系统进行关节固定术治疗骶髂关节综合征患者的两年临床结果。

Two-year clinical results of patients with sacroiliac joint syndrome treated by arthrodesis using a triangular implant system.

作者信息

Bornemann Rahel, Roessler Philip P, Strauss Andreas C, Sander Kirsten, Rommelspacher Yorck, Wirtz Dieter C, Pflugmacher Robert, Frey Sönke P

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2017;25(2):319-325. doi: 10.3233/THC-161272.

DOI:10.3233/THC-161272
PMID:27858725
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) syndrome can cause various symptoms and may also be one reason for persistent low back pain, especially in patients with prior spinal fusions. If conservative treatments fail to improve symptoms, arthrodesis surgery can be considered. Minimally invasive approaches have emerged recently providing a good alternative to conventional methods. A novel triangular implant system (iFuse) can achieve an arthrodesis of the SIJ without the use of additional screws or bone material.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of the present study was an evaluation of short-term safety and efficacy of the implant system.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients were included in the study and treated with the iFuse system. In addition to demographic data, pain intensity (visual analogue scale) and functional impairment (Oswestry-disability index) were assessed prior to surgery and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months thereafter. During surgery and the follow up period all adverse events were documented and the correct implant position was controlled via plain radiographs.

RESULTS

VAS scores and ODI improved significantly directly after surgery from 84.3 ± 9.2 mm to 40.7 ± 9.2 mm and from 76.8 ± 9.2% to 40.7 ± 9.2 % (p < 0.001). The ODI improved further to 31 ± 5.4% after 24 months whereas the VAS improved until the 3 months examination and ten stayed constant between 27.7 mm and 26.5 mm to 27 ± 6.6 mm at 24 months. No adverse events, intraoperative complications, implant malpositioning or loosening could be recorded at any time.

CONCLUSIONS

The iFuse system is an effective and safe treatment for minimally invasive surgical arthrodesis of the SIJ. Pain and functional impairment can be significantly improved. However, in addition to this case series, further controlled studies are necessary, particularly in terms of a previous spinal fusion history.

摘要

背景

骶髂关节(SIJ)综合征可引发多种症状,也可能是持续性腰痛的原因之一,尤其是在既往有脊柱融合手术史的患者中。若保守治疗无法改善症状,可考虑进行关节融合手术。近年来出现的微创方法为传统方法提供了良好的替代方案。一种新型三角形植入系统(iFuse)无需使用额外的螺钉或骨材料即可实现骶髂关节的融合。

目的

本研究旨在评估该植入系统的短期安全性和有效性。

方法

24例患者纳入本研究并接受iFuse系统治疗。除人口统计学数据外,在手术前以及术后1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月和24个月评估疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)和功能障碍(Oswestry功能障碍指数)。在手术期间和随访期间记录所有不良事件,并通过X线平片检查植入物的正确位置。

结果

术后VAS评分和ODI立即显著改善,从84.3±9.2mm降至40.7±9.2mm,从76.8±9.2%降至40.7±9.2%(p<0.001)。24个月后ODI进一步改善至31±5.4%,而VAS在3个月检查时有所改善,之后保持稳定,从27.7mm至26.5mm,24个月时为27±6.6mm。在任何时间均未记录到不良事件、术中并发症、植入物位置不当或松动情况。

结论

iFuse系统是骶髂关节微创融合手术的一种有效且安全的治疗方法。疼痛和功能障碍可得到显著改善。然而,除了本病例系列外,还需要进一步的对照研究,特别是对于有既往脊柱融合手术史的患者。

相似文献

1
Two-year clinical results of patients with sacroiliac joint syndrome treated by arthrodesis using a triangular implant system.使用三角形植入系统进行关节固定术治疗骶髂关节综合征患者的两年临床结果。
Technol Health Care. 2017;25(2):319-325. doi: 10.3233/THC-161272.
2
Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.一项关于使用三角形钛植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术与保守治疗的随机对照试验的六个月结果。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):708-719. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4599-9. Epub 2016 May 14.
3
1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.保守治疗与微创外科治疗骶髂关节疼痛的随机对照试验 1 年结果。
Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):537-550.
4
Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.三叶状钛植入物用于骶髂关节融合。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5860-1. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
5
Distraction arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint: 2-year results of a descriptive prospective multi-center cohort study in 171 patients.骶髂关节撑开融合术:171例患者的描述性前瞻性多中心队列研究2年结果
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jan;27(1):194-204. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5313-2. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节稳定术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(2 Suppl):Editorial. doi: 10.3171/2013.V2.FOCUS13273.
7
Randomized Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis Compared with Conservative Management for Chronic Low Back Pain Attributed to the Sacroiliac Joint.随机对照试验:骶髂关节融合术与保守治疗慢性下腰痛伴骶髂关节病变的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 6;101(5):400-411. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00022.
8
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.微创骶髂关节融合术治疗慢性骶髂关节痛:系统评价。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1240-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
9
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using a Novel Hydroxyapatite-Coated Screw: Preliminary 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results of a 2-Year Prospective Study.使用新型羟基磷灰石涂层螺钉的微创骶髂关节融合术:一项为期2年的前瞻性研究的初步1年临床和影像学结果
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:493-497. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.046. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
[Clinical Trial to Test the iFuse Implant System® in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome: One Year Results].[测试iFuse植入系统®治疗骶髂关节综合征患者的临床试验:一年结果]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2016 Dec;154(6):601-605. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-110207. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcome measures following lateral versus posterior sacroiliac joint fusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis.骶髂关节外侧与后侧融合术后的临床结局指标:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 12;5:104212. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104212. eCollection 2025.
2
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创外侧、后侧及后外侧骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2025 Feb;53(2):3000605251315300. doi: 10.1177/03000605251315300.
3
Utility of minimally invasive percutaneous arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review of the literature.
微创经皮骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛的效用:文献系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar;34(3):974-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08629-4. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
4
Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion: current insights and a comprehensive literature review.微创骶髂关节融合术:当前见解与全面文献综述
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jul 1;54(6):1185-1191. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5898. eCollection 2024.
5
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.
6
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.慢性骶髂关节疼痛的微创骶髂关节融合手术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 26;17(6):794-808. doi: 10.14444/8543.
7
Evaluation of a New Treatment Strategy for Geriatric Fragility Fractures of the Posterior Pelvic Ring Using Sensor-Supported Insoles: A Proof-of-Concept Study.使用传感器支持的鞋垫评估老年骨盆后环脆性骨折的新治疗策略:一项概念验证研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 10;12(16):5199. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165199.
8
Beyond the pedicle screw-a patent review.超越椎弓根螺钉-专利审查。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Jun;31(6):1553-1565. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07193-z. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
9
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.国际脊柱手术进展协会2020年政策更新——微创骶髂关节融合术(用于慢性骶髂关节疼痛):覆盖范围、适应症、局限性及医疗必要性
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):860-895. doi: 10.14444/7156. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
10
Editor's Introduction: Update on Current Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures: Implications for Appropriate Current Procedural Terminology Medical Coding.编辑引言:骶髂关节融合手术的最新进展:对现行程序术语医学编码的影响
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):853-859. doi: 10.14444/7136. Epub 2020 Dec 29.