Newton Michael D, Davidson Abigail A, Pomajzl Ryan, Seta Joseph, Kurdziel Michael D, Maerz Tristan
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
J Biomech. 2016 Dec 8;49(16):4159-4163. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
Rotator cuff tears are a common shoulder pathology. The rat supraspinatus tendon model is commonly employed for preclinical assessment of rotator cuff pathology or regeneration. However, there is a lack of a standardized biomechanical testing protocol; previous studies have tested the tendon at abduction angles ranging from -15° to 90°. This study aimed to assess the effect of abduction/testing angle on the biomechanical properties of the rat supraspinatus tendon. Fourty-eight shoulders (n=12/group) from healthy Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to 4 testing angle groups: 0° (corresponding to 90° abduction), 30°, 60°, and 90° (0° abduction). Biomechanical testing of the supraspinatus was performed, consisting of stress-relaxation and load-to-failure. Mechanical properties were calculated, and nonlinear tensile modeling was performed via the Quasilinear Viscoelastic (QLV) and Structurally Based Elastic (SBE) models. Results indicate that testing angle significantly affects supraspinatus tendon biomechanics. Stiffness and modulus significantly decreased with increasing testing angle (stiffness: 20.93±5.8N/mm at 0° vs. 6.12±1.0N/mm at 90°, P<.001; modulus: 59.51±34.0MPa at 0° vs. 22.37±7.4MPa at 90°, P=.002). Testing angle correlated significantly to ultimate strain, yield strain, and all coefficients of the SBE and QLV models, implying differences in collagen fiber crimp patterns and viscoelastic behavior as a function of testing angle. These results suggest that differences in testing methodology, in particular testing angle, significantly affect the measured mechanical properties of the supraspinatus tendon. Future studies may consider utilizing testing angles of 0°-30°, at which tendon stiffness is maximized, and full standardization of rat rotator cuff testing protocols is necessary.
肩袖撕裂是一种常见的肩部病变。大鼠冈上肌腱模型常用于肩袖病变或再生的临床前评估。然而,目前缺乏标准化的生物力学测试方案;以往的研究在 -15°至90°的外展角度下对肌腱进行了测试。本研究旨在评估外展/测试角度对大鼠冈上肌腱生物力学特性的影响。将48只来自健康Sprague-Dawley大鼠的肩部(n = 12/组)随机分为4个测试角度组:0°(对应90°外展)、30°、60°和90°(0°外展)。对冈上肌进行了生物力学测试,包括应力松弛和直至破坏的负荷测试。计算了力学性能,并通过准线性粘弹性(QLV)和基于结构的弹性(SBE)模型进行了非线性拉伸建模。结果表明,测试角度显著影响冈上肌腱的生物力学。随着测试角度的增加,刚度和模量显著降低(刚度:0°时为20.93±5.8N/mm,90°时为6.12±1.0N/mm,P <.001;模量:0°时为59.51±34.0MPa,90°时为22.37±7.4MPa,P = 0.002)。测试角度与极限应变、屈服应变以及SBE和QLV模型的所有系数显著相关,这意味着胶原纤维卷曲模式和粘弹性行为随测试角度而有所不同。这些结果表明,测试方法的差异,特别是测试角度,会显著影响所测得的冈上肌腱力学性能。未来的研究可能会考虑采用0°-30°的测试角度,此时肌腱刚度最大,并且对大鼠肩袖测试方案进行全面标准化是必要的。