Liu Yang, Fu Sai C, Leong Hio T, Ling Samuel Ka-Kin, Oh Joo H, Yung Patrick Shu-Hang
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
LuiChe Woo Institute of Innovative Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
J Orthop Translat. 2020 Mar 23;26:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.02.012. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Restoring the shoulder function is a crucial demand of patients with rotator cuff (RC) tears. Most preclinical studies only focused on biological and mechanical measurements. Functional assessment was less investigated in the preclinical studies. This study aims to review the literature of shoulder function in animal models for RC tears and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of different shoulder functional assessments and animal models.
A literature search for studies used RC tear animal models to evaluate changes in shoulder function was performed. We searched databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to September 2019. Animal species, functional parameters, injury and repair types, and study durations were summarised. Cluster analyses were then used to separate animal models with different levels of injury and timings of repair. The reliability and clinical relevance of the included assessments and animal models were then discussed.
Fourteen animal studies that related to shoulder function in animal models of RC tears were reviewed. Five methods (gait analysis, passive range of motion test, open field test, staircase test, and running endurance test) to assess shoulder function were identified. Single or massive RC tendon tears and immediate or delayed RC repair models were found. We reported and discussed factors to be considered when researchers would select assessments and animal models for different study purposes.
Based on current evidences, gait analysis is the most appropriate method to assess changes in shoulder function of animal models of RC tears. More studies are required to further elucidate the reliability of passive range of motion measurement, open field test, staircase test, and running endurance test. Models that use massive tears and delayed repair better represent the clinical condition found in humans.
Using more clinically relevant animal models and assessments for shoulder function identified in this review may help to investigate the value of preclinical researches and promote translation of preclinical interventions into clinical practices.
恢复肩袖(RC)撕裂患者的肩部功能是一项关键需求。大多数临床前研究仅关注生物学和力学测量。临床前研究中对功能评估的研究较少。本研究旨在回顾关于RC撕裂动物模型肩部功能的文献,并评估不同肩部功能评估方法和动物模型的优缺点。
对使用RC撕裂动物模型评估肩部功能变化的研究进行文献检索。我们检索了从数据库建立至2019年9月的PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Scopus数据库。总结了动物种类、功能参数、损伤和修复类型以及研究持续时间。然后使用聚类分析来区分具有不同损伤程度和修复时间的动物模型。接着讨论了纳入评估方法和动物模型的可靠性及临床相关性。
回顾了14项与RC撕裂动物模型肩部功能相关的动物研究。确定了5种评估肩部功能的方法(步态分析、被动活动范围测试、旷场试验、楼梯试验和跑步耐力试验)。发现了单处或多处RC肌腱撕裂以及即时或延迟RC修复模型。我们报告并讨论了研究人员为不同研究目的选择评估方法和动物模型时应考虑的因素。
基于目前的证据,步态分析是评估RC撕裂动物模型肩部功能变化的最合适方法。需要更多研究进一步阐明被动活动范围测量、旷场试验、楼梯试验和跑步耐力试验的可靠性。使用多处撕裂和延迟修复的模型能更好地反映人类临床情况。
使用本综述中确定的更具临床相关性的动物模型和肩部功能评估方法,可能有助于研究临床前研究的价值,并促进将临床前干预措施转化为临床实践。