Price James R, Cole Kevin, Bexley Andrew, Kostiou Vasiliki, Eyre David W, Golubchik Tanya, Wilson Daniel J, Crook Derrick W, Walker A Sarah, Peto Timothy E A, Llewelyn Martin J, Paul John
Department of Microbiology and Infection, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK.
Department of Microbiology and Infection, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK; Public Health England, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;17(2):207-214. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30413-3. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
Health-care workers have been implicated in nosocomial outbreaks of Staphylococcus aureus, but the dearth of evidence from non-outbreak situations means that routine health-care worker screening and S aureus eradication are controversial. We aimed to determine how often S aureus is transmitted from health-care workers or the environment to patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) and a high-dependency unit (HDU) where standard infection control measures were in place.
In this longitudinal cohort study, we systematically sampled health-care workers, the environment, and patients over 14 months at the ICU and HDU of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, England. Nasal swabs were taken from health-care workers every 4 weeks, bed spaces were sampled monthly, and screening swabs were obtained from patients at admission to the ICU or HDU, weekly thereafter, and at discharge. Isolates were cultured and their whole genome sequenced, and we used the threshold of 40 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) or fewer to define subtypes and infer recent transmission.
Between Oct 31, 2011, and Dec 23, 2012, we sampled 198 health-care workers, 40 environmental locations, and 1854 patients; 1819 isolates were sequenced. Median nasal carriage rate of S aureus in health-care workers at 4-weekly timepoints was 36·9% (IQR 35·7-37·3), and 115 (58%) health-care workers had S aureus detected at least once during the study. S aureus was identified in 8-50% of environmental samples. 605 genetically distinct subtypes were identified (median SNV difference 273, IQR 162-399) at a rate of 38 (IQR 34-42) per 4-weekly cycle. Only 25 instances of transmission to patients (seven from health-care workers, two from the environment, and 16 from other patients) were detected.
In the presence of standard infection control measures, health-care workers were infrequently sources of transmission to patients. S aureus epidemiology in the ICU and HDU is characterised by continuous ingress of distinct subtypes rather than transmission of genetically related strains.
UK Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK National Institute for Health Research, and Public Health England.
医护人员被认为与金黄色葡萄球菌的医院感染暴发有关,但非暴发情况下缺乏证据意味着常规医护人员筛查和金黄色葡萄球菌根除存在争议。我们旨在确定在实施标准感染控制措施的重症监护病房(ICU)和高依赖病房(HDU)中,金黄色葡萄球菌从医护人员或环境传播给患者的频率。
在这项纵向队列研究中,我们在英国布莱顿皇家苏塞克斯郡医院的ICU和HDU对医护人员、环境和患者进行了为期14个月的系统抽样。医护人员每4周采集一次鼻拭子,床位空间每月采样一次,患者在入住ICU或HDU时、此后每周以及出院时采集筛查拭子。对分离株进行培养并对其全基因组进行测序,我们使用40个或更少的单核苷酸变异(SNV)阈值来定义亚型并推断近期传播情况。
在2011年10月31日至2012年12月23日期间,我们对198名医护人员、40个环境位置和1854名患者进行了采样;对1819株分离株进行了测序。医护人员每4周时间点的金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔携带率中位数为36.9%(四分位间距35.7 - 37.3),115名(58%)医护人员在研究期间至少一次检测到金黄色葡萄球菌。在8% - 50%的环境样本中鉴定出金黄色葡萄球菌。共鉴定出605个基因不同的亚型(SNV差异中位数273,四分位间距162 - 399),每4周周期的鉴定率为38个(四分位间距34 - 42)。仅检测到25例传播给患者的情况(7例来自医护人员,2例来自环境,16例来自其他患者)。
在实施标准感染控制措施的情况下,医护人员很少成为传播给患者的源头。ICU和HDU中的金黄色葡萄球菌流行病学特征是不同亚型的持续传入,而非基因相关菌株的传播。
英国医学研究理事会、惠康信托基金会、生物技术和生物科学研究理事会、英国国家卫生研究院以及英国公共卫生部。