Parsons John G M, Plant Sarah E, Slark Julia, Tyson Sarah F
a School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences , The University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand.
b The Institute of Healthy Ageing, Waikato District Health Board , Hamilton , New Zealand.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Feb;40(3):309-316. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1253115. Epub 2016 Nov 20.
We investigated stroke rehabilitation clinician's perceptions of the patient as an active partner in setting goals within stroke rehabilitation and factors that influence patient engagement.
Semi-structured interviews, subject to general inductive analysis with 20 Clinicians' working in three UK based stroke rehabilitation teams (one in-patient ward and two community based rehabilitation teams).
There were three key themes that impacted on the patients active involvement in setting goals for rehabilitation after stroke: Patient barriers to goal setting (knowledge of the patient and family, who is the patient and the stroke's impact); How we work as a team (the role of the patient in setting goals, the effect of clinician attributes on goal setting); and How systems impact goal setting (goal-setting practice, home versus hospital, and professional/funder expectations of clinicians').
Goal setting served a range of different, sometimes conflicting, functions within rehabilitation. Clinicians' identified the integral nature of goals to engage and motivate patients and to provide direction and purpose for rehabilitation. Further, there was an identified need to consider the impact of prioritizing clinician-derived goals at the expense of patient-identified goals. Lastly the reliance on the SMART goal format requires further consideration, both in terms of the proposed benefits and whether they disempower the patient during rehabilitation. Implications for rehabilitation Goal setting is often promoted as a relatively simple, straightforward way to structure interactions with patients Patient-related factors together with resourcing constraints are significant barriers to patient-centered goal setting, particularly during inpatient rehabilitation Clinicians need to have pragmatic tools that can be integrated into practice to ensure that goal-setting practice can be maximized for patients with different intrinsic characteristics.
我们调查了中风康复临床医生对于患者作为中风康复目标设定中的积极伙伴的看法,以及影响患者参与度的因素。
采用半结构化访谈,并对来自英国三个中风康复团队(一个住院病房团队和两个社区康复团队)的20名临床医生进行一般归纳分析。
有三个关键主题影响了患者在中风后康复目标设定中的积极参与:目标设定的患者障碍(患者及家属的认知、患者是谁以及中风的影响);我们团队的工作方式(患者在目标设定中的作用、临床医生特质对目标设定的影响);以及系统如何影响目标设定(目标设定实践、家庭与医院环境、临床医生的专业/资助者期望)。
目标设定在康复过程中发挥着一系列不同的、有时相互冲突的功能。临床医生认识到目标对于吸引和激励患者以及为康复提供方向和目的的不可或缺性。此外,人们认识到需要考虑以牺牲患者确定的目标为代价优先考虑临床医生确定的目标所带来的影响。最后,对SMART目标格式的依赖需要进一步思考,既要考虑其宣称的益处,也要考虑其在康复过程中是否会削弱患者的能力。对康复的启示目标设定通常被推崇为一种相对简单、直接的与患者构建互动的方式。与患者相关的因素以及资源限制是实现以患者为中心的目标设定的重大障碍,尤其是在住院康复期间。临床医生需要拥有可融入实践的实用工具,以确保针对具有不同内在特征的患者能够最大限度地发挥目标设定实践的作用。