Chazalviel Laurent, Blatteau Jean-Eric, Vallée Nicolas, Risso Jean-Jacques, Besnard Stéphane, Abraini Jacques H
Normandie Université, UNICAEN, CNRS, UMR 6301 ISTCT, Equipe Cervoxy, Caen, France.
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées (HIA) Sainte-Anne, Service de Médecine Hyperbare et Expertise Plongée (SMHEP), Toulon, France.
Med Gas Res. 2016 Oct 14;6(3):169-173. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.191364. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
Normobaric oxygen (NBO) and hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) are emerging as a possible co-treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Both have been shown to reduce infarct volume, to improve neurologic outcome, to promote endogenous tissue plasminogen activator-induced thrombolysis and cerebral blood flow, and to improve tissue oxygenation through oxygen diffusion in the ischemic areas, thereby questioning the interest of HBO compared to NBO. In the present study, in order to investigate and compare the oxygen diffusion effects of NBO and HBO on acute ischemic stroke independently of their effects at the vascular level, we used acute brain slices exposed to oxygen and glucose deprivation, an model of brain ischemia that allows investigating the acute effects of NBO (partial pressure of oxygen (pO) = 1 atmospheres absolute (ATA) = 0.1 MPa) and HBO (pO = 2.5 ATA = 0.25 MPa) through tissue oxygenation on ischemia-induced cell injury as measured by the release of lactate dehydrogenase. We found that HBO, but not NBO, reduced oxygen and glucose deprivation-induced cell injury, indicating that passive tissue oxygenation (. without vascular support) of the brain parenchyma requires oxygen partial pressure higher than 1 ATA.
常压氧(NBO)和高压氧(HBO)正逐渐成为急性缺血性卒中可能的联合治疗方法。两者均已显示可减少梗死体积、改善神经功能结局、促进内源性组织纤溶酶原激活剂诱导的溶栓及脑血流量,并通过缺血区域的氧扩散改善组织氧合,从而引发了与NBO相比HBO是否具有优势的质疑。在本研究中,为了独立于NBO和HBO在血管水平的作用来研究和比较它们对急性缺血性卒中的氧扩散效应,我们使用了暴露于氧和葡萄糖剥夺的急性脑片,这是一种脑缺血模型,可通过组织氧合来研究NBO(氧分压(pO)=1个绝对大气压(ATA)=0.1 MPa)和HBO(pO = 2.5 ATA = 0.25 MPa)对缺血诱导的细胞损伤的急性效应,细胞损伤通过乳酸脱氢酶的释放来衡量。我们发现,HBO而非NBO可减轻氧和葡萄糖剥夺诱导的细胞损伤,这表明脑实质的被动组织氧合(.无血管支持)需要高于1 ATA的氧分压。