Papp-Wallace Krisztina M, Becka Scott A, Taracila Magdalena A, Zeiser Elise T, Gatta Julian A, LiPuma John J, Bonomo Robert A
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jan 24;61(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01941-16. Print 2017 Feb.
The unwelcome evolution of resistance to the advanced generation cephalosporin antibiotic, ceftazidime is hindering the effective therapy of Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) infections. Regrettably, BCC organisms are highly resistant to most antibiotics, including polymyxins; ceftazidime and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are the most effective treatment options. Unfortunately, resistance to ceftazidime is increasing and posing a health threat to populations susceptible to BCC infection. We found that up to 36% of 146 tested BCC clinical isolates were nonsusceptible to ceftazidime (MICs ≥ 8 μg/ml). To date, the biochemical basis for ceftazidime resistance in BCC is largely undefined. In this study, we investigated the role of the Ω-loop in mediating ceftazidime resistance in the PenA β-lactamase from Burkholderia multivorans, a species within the BCC. Single amino acid substitutions were engineered at selected positions (R164, T167, L169, and D179) in the PenA β-lactamase. Cell-based susceptibility testing revealed that 21 of 75 PenA variants engineered in this study were resistant to ceftazidime, with MICs of >8 μg/ml. Under steady-state conditions, each of the selected variants (R164S, T167G, L169A, and D179N) demonstrated a substrate preference for ceftazidime compared to wild-type PenA (32- to 320-fold difference). Notably, the L169A variant hydrolyzed ceftazidime significantly faster than PenA and possessed an ∼65-fold-lower apparent K (K) than that of PenA. To understand why these amino acid substitutions result in enhanced ceftazidime binding and/or turnover, we employed molecular dynamics simulation (MDS). The MDS suggested that the L169A variant starts with the most energetically favorable conformation (-28.1 kcal/mol), whereas PenA possessed the most unfavorable initial conformation (136.07 kcal/mol). In addition, we observed that the spatial arrangement of E166, N170, and the hydrolytic water molecules may be critical for enhanced ceftazidime hydrolysis by the L169A variant. Importantly, we found that two clinical isolates of B. multivorans possessed L169 amino acid substitutions (L169F and L169P) in PenA and were highly resistant to ceftazidime (MICs ≥ 512 μg/ml). In conclusion, substitutions in the Ω-loop alter the positioning of the hydrolytic machinery as well as allow for a larger opening of the active site to accommodate the bulky R1 and R2 side chains of ceftazidime, resulting in resistance. This analysis provides insights into the emerging phenotype of ceftazidime-resistant BCC and explains the evolution of amino acid substitutions in the Ω-loop of PenA of this significant clinical pathogen.
对新一代头孢菌素抗生素头孢他啶耐药性的不良演变,正阻碍着洋葱伯克霍尔德菌复合体(BCC)感染的有效治疗。遗憾的是,BCC微生物对包括多粘菌素在内的大多数抗生素都具有高度耐药性;头孢他啶和甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑是最有效的治疗选择。不幸的是,对头孢他啶的耐药性正在增加,并对易受BCC感染的人群构成健康威胁。我们发现,在146株测试的BCC临床分离株中,高达36%对头孢他啶不敏感(最低抑菌浓度[MIC]≥8μg/ml)。迄今为止,BCC中头孢他啶耐药性的生化基础在很大程度上尚不明确。在本研究中,我们研究了Ω环在介导多食伯克霍尔德菌(BCC中的一个菌种)的PenAβ-内酰胺酶对头孢他啶耐药性中的作用。在PenAβ-内酰胺酶的选定位置(R164、T167、L169和D179)进行了单氨基酸替换。基于细胞的药敏试验显示,在本研究中构建的75个PenA变体中有21个对头孢他啶耐药,MIC>8μg/ml。在稳态条件下,与野生型PenA相比,每个选定的变体(R164S、T167G、L169A和D179N)对头孢他啶都表现出底物偏好(差异为32至320倍)。值得注意的是,L169A变体水解头孢他啶的速度明显快于PenA,其表观解离常数(K)比PenA低约65倍。为了理解为什么这些氨基酸替换会导致头孢他啶结合和/或周转增强,我们采用了分子动力学模拟(MDS)。MDS表明,L169A变体起始时具有能量最有利的构象(-28.1千卡/摩尔),而PenA具有最不利的初始构象(136.07千卡/摩尔)。此外,我们观察到E166、N170和水解水分子的空间排列可能对L169A变体增强头孢他啶水解至关重要。重要的是,我们发现两株多食伯克霍尔德菌临床分离株在PenA中具有L169氨基酸替换(L169F和L169P),并且对头孢他啶高度耐药(MIC≥512μg/ml)。总之,Ω环中的替换改变了水解机制的定位,并允许活性位点有更大的开口以容纳头孢他啶庞大的R1和R2侧链,从而导致耐药性。该分析为头孢他啶耐药BCC的新出现表型提供了见解,并解释了这种重要临床病原体PenA的Ω环中氨基酸替换进化的原因。