Bechinger B, Gorr S-U
1 University of Strasbourg/CNRS, Chemistry Institute, Strasbourg, France.
2 University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Dent Res. 2017 Mar;96(3):254-260. doi: 10.1177/0022034516679973. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
More than 40 antimicrobial peptides and proteins (AMPs) are expressed in the oral cavity. These AMPs have been organized into 6 functional groups, 1 of which, cationic AMPs, has received extensive attention in recent years for their promise as potential antibiotics. The goal of this review is to describe recent advances in our understanding of the diverse mechanisms of action of cationic AMPs and the bacterial resistance against these peptides. The recently developed peptide GL13K is used as an example to illustrate many of the discussed concepts. Cationic AMPs typically exhibit an amphipathic conformation, which allows increased interaction with negatively charged bacterial membranes. Peptides undergo changes in conformation and aggregation state in the presence of membranes; conversely, lipid conformation and packing can adapt to the presence of peptides. As a consequence, a single peptide can act through several mechanisms depending on the peptide's structure, the peptide:lipid ratio, and the properties of the lipid membrane. Accumulating evidence shows that in addition to acting at the cell membrane, AMPs may act on the cell wall, inhibit protein folding or enzyme activity, or act intracellularly. Therefore, once a peptide has reached the cell wall, cell membrane, or its internal target, the difference in mechanism of action on gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria may be less pronounced than formerly assumed. While AMPs should not cause widespread resistance due to their preferential attack on the cell membrane, in cases where specific protein targets are involved, the possibility exists for genetic mutations and bacterial resistance. Indeed, the potential clinical use of AMPs has raised the concern that resistance to therapeutic AMPs could be associated with resistance to endogenous host-defense peptides. Current evidence suggests that this is a rare event that can be overcome by subtle structural modifications of an AMP.
口腔中表达的抗菌肽和蛋白质(AMPs)超过40种。这些AMPs已被分为6个功能组,其中之一,阳离子AMPs,近年来因其作为潜在抗生素的前景而受到广泛关注。本综述的目的是描述我们对阳离子AMPs不同作用机制以及细菌对这些肽的抗性的最新认识进展。以最近开发的肽GL13K为例来说明许多讨论的概念。阳离子AMPs通常呈现两亲性构象,这使得其与带负电荷的细菌膜的相互作用增加。肽在膜存在的情况下会发生构象和聚集状态的变化;相反,脂质构象和堆积可以适应肽的存在。因此,单个肽可以通过多种机制起作用,这取决于肽的结构、肽与脂质的比例以及脂质膜的性质。越来越多的证据表明,除了作用于细胞膜外,AMPs还可能作用于细胞壁、抑制蛋白质折叠或酶活性,或在细胞内起作用。因此,一旦肽到达细胞壁、细胞膜或其内部靶点,其对革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌的作用机制差异可能比以前认为的要小。虽然AMPs由于优先攻击细胞膜而不应导致广泛的抗性,但在涉及特定蛋白质靶点的情况下,存在基因突变和细菌抗性的可能性。事实上,AMPs的潜在临床应用引发了人们的担忧,即对治疗性AMPs的抗性可能与对内源性宿主防御肽的抗性相关。目前的证据表明,这是一种罕见的情况,可以通过对AMPs进行细微的结构修饰来克服。