Suppr超能文献

使用自动瞳孔测量法预测青光眼功能性和结构性损伤中的双眼不对称性。

Predicting the intereye asymmetry in functional and structural damage in glaucoma using automated pupillography.

作者信息

Rao Harsha L, Kadambi Sujatha V, Dasari Srilakshmi, Reddy Hemanth B, Palakurthy Meena, Riyazuddin Mohammed, Puttaiah Narendra K, Pradhan Zia S, Rao Dhanaraj A S, Shetty Rohit

机构信息

Narayana Nethralaya, Rajajinagar, Bangalore, India.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;95(7):e532-e538. doi: 10.1111/aos.13317. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To predict the intereye asymmetry in functional (mean deviation, MD on visual field, VF) and structural (retinal nerve fibre layer, RNFL and ganglion cell complex, GCC thickness on spectral domain optical coherence tomography, SDOCT) measurements in glaucoma using the automated pupillography parameters.

METHODS

Fifty-nine subjects with a diagnosis of either glaucoma or glaucoma suspect underwent automated pupillography along with VF and SDOCT examinations. Association between pupillography and the absolute intereye difference in MD, RNFL and GCC measurements was evaluated using regression analysis after accounting for the multicollinearity.

RESULTS

Univariate regression analysis showed statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) between multiple pupillography parameters and the intereye difference in MD, RNFL and GCC thickness measurements. Multivariate regression with less strongly correlated parameters identified intereye difference in amplitude change (Ac) per cent to be the parameter that best predicted the intereye asymmetry in MD (Intereye asymmetry in MD = 2.20 + 1.33intereye difference in Ac per cent, R  = 0.36), RNFL thickness (3.38 + 3.55intereye difference in Ac per cent, R  = 0.49) and GCC thickness (4.49 + 2.06* intereye difference in Ac per cent, R  = 0.41). Ability of intereye Ac per cent difference to predict intereye asymmetry in MD, RNFL and GCC thickness was better in patients with angle closure disease (R  = 0.38, 0.79, 0.66, respectively) compared to those with open angles (R  = 0.25, 0.15, 0.16, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Intereye asymmetry in MD, RNFL and GCC thickness measurements was best predicted by the intereye difference in Ac per cent on automated pupillography. The predicting ability was better in patients with angle closure compared to those with open angles.

摘要

目的

使用自动瞳孔测量参数预测青光眼患者在功能(平均偏差,视野MD)和结构(视网膜神经纤维层,RNFL以及神经节细胞复合体,光谱域光学相干断层扫描SDOCT测量的GCC厚度)测量中的双眼不对称性。

方法

59例诊断为青光眼或疑似青光眼的受试者接受了自动瞳孔测量以及视野和SDOCT检查。在考虑多重共线性后,使用回归分析评估瞳孔测量与MD、RNFL和GCC测量中双眼绝对差异之间的关联。

结果

单变量回归分析显示,多个瞳孔测量参数与MD、RNFL和GCC厚度测量中的双眼差异之间存在统计学显著关联(p < 0.05)。使用相关性较弱的参数进行多变量回归分析,结果表明,每百分比幅度变化(Ac)的双眼差异是预测MD(MD双眼不对称性 = 2.20 + 1.33×每百分比Ac双眼差异,R = 0.36)、RNFL厚度(3.38 + 3.55×每百分比Ac双眼差异,R = 0.49)和GCC厚度(4.49 + 2.06×每百分比Ac双眼差异,R = 0.41)中双眼不对称性的最佳参数。与开角患者(分别为R = 0.25、0.15、0.16)相比,闭角型疾病患者中每百分比Ac双眼差异预测MD、RNFL和GCC厚度双眼不对称性的能力更好(分别为R = 0.38、0.79、0.66)。

结论

自动瞳孔测量中每百分比Ac的双眼差异最能预测MD、RNFL和GCC厚度测量中的双眼不对称性。与开角患者相比,闭角患者的预测能力更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验