Stanton Robert, Wintour Sally-Anne, Kean Crystal O
School of Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Australia.
School of Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 May;20(5):518-523. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Smartphone applications are increasingly used by researchers, coaches, athletes and clinicians. The aim of this study was to examine the concurrent validity and intra-rater reliability of the smartphone-based application, MyJump, against laboratory-based force plate measurements.
Cross sectional study.
Participants completed counter-movement jumps (CMJ) (n=29) and 30cm drop jumps (DJ) (n=27) on a force plate which were simultaneously recorded using MyJump. To assess concurrent validity, jump height, derived from flight time acquired from each device, was compared for each jump type. Intra-rater reliability was determined by replicating data analysis of MyJump recordings on two occasions separated by seven days.
CMJ and DJ heights derived from MyJump showed excellent agreement with the force plate (ICC values range from 0.991 for CMJ to 0.993) However mean DJ height from the force plate was significantly higher than MyJump (mean difference: 0.87cm, 95% CI: 0.69-1.04cm). Intra-rater reliability of MyJump for both CMJ and DJ was almost perfect (ICC values range from 0.997 for CMJ to 0.998 for DJ); however, mean CMJ and DJ jump height for Day 1 was significantly higher than Day 2 (CMJ: 0.43cm, 95% CI: 0.23-0.62cm); (DJ: 0.38cm, 95% CI: 0.23-0.53cm).
The present study finds MyJump to be a valid and highly reliable tool for researchers, coaches, athletes and clinicians; however, systematic bias should be considered when comparing MyJump outputs to other testing devices.
研究人员、教练、运动员和临床医生越来越多地使用智能手机应用程序。本研究的目的是检验基于智能手机的应用程序MyJump与基于实验室的测力台测量结果的同时效度和评分者内信度。
横断面研究。
参与者在测力台上完成反向纵跳(CMJ)(n = 29)和30厘米下落跳(DJ)(n = 27),同时使用MyJump进行记录。为了评估同时效度,比较了每种跳跃类型从每个设备获取的飞行时间得出的跳跃高度。评分者内信度通过在相隔七天的两个时间点重复对MyJump记录进行数据分析来确定。
MyJump得出的CMJ和DJ高度与测力台显示出极好的一致性(ICC值范围从CMJ的0.991到0.993)。然而,测力台得出的平均DJ高度显著高于MyJump(平均差异:0.87厘米,95%置信区间:0.69 - 1.04厘米)。MyJump对于CMJ和DJ的评分者内信度几乎是完美的(ICC值范围从CMJ的0.997到DJ的0.998);然而,第1天的平均CMJ和DJ跳跃高度显著高于第2天(CMJ:0.43厘米,95%置信区间:0.23 - 0.62厘米);(DJ:0.38厘米,95%置信区间:0.23 - 0.53厘米)。
本研究发现MyJump对于研究人员、教练、运动员和临床医生来说是一个有效且高度可靠的工具;然而,在将MyJump的输出结果与其他测试设备进行比较时,应考虑系统偏差。