El-Rajab Inaam, Klotzbier Thomas J, Korbus Heide, Schott Nadja
Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 May 9;7:1531050. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1531050. eCollection 2025.
In recent years, the proliferation of mobile applications in the health and fitness sector has been rapid. Despite the enhanced accessibility of these systems, concerns regarding their validation persist, and their accuracy remains to be thoroughly evaluated compared to conventional motion analysis methodologies. Furthermore, there is a paucity of evidence regarding real-time feedback and movement quality assessment. Consequently, this systematic review aims to evaluate the current state of camera-based mobile applications for movement screening in healthy adults, focusing on specific types of movement.
A systematic literature search was conducted in four databases-PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore-covering the period from 2000 to 2024. The search strategy was based on key terms related to four main concepts: screening, mobile applications, cameras, and physical activity. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The study was registered on PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42023444355) to ensure transparency and prevent selective reporting of outcomes.
Of the 2,716 records initially identified, eight studies met the specified inclusion criteria. The studies were primarily concerned with fitness exercises, gait analysis, and sport-specific movements. Some studies demonstrated high reliability compared to gold standard systems, while others reported technical limitations such as camera positioning and data interpretation issues. Feedback mechanisms varied, with many applications lacking personalized real-time correction.
Despite the potential of smartphone-based movement screening applications, particularly their accessibility and affordability, challenges remain regarding accuracy and user feedback. Precise measurements comparable to established methods are crucial for application-oriented camera-based movement screening. Equally important are improving real-time feedback, expanding the types of movement that can be assessed, and ensuring broad applicability across different populations and environments to ensure sustainable use of application-based movement screening.
近年来,健康与健身领域的移动应用程序迅速激增。尽管这些系统的可及性有所提高,但对其验证的担忧依然存在,与传统运动分析方法相比,其准确性仍有待全面评估。此外,关于实时反馈和运动质量评估的证据也很匮乏。因此,本系统评价旨在评估基于摄像头的移动应用程序在健康成年人运动筛查方面的现状,重点关注特定类型的运动。
在四个数据库(PubMed、ScienceDirect、Web of Science和IEEE Xplore)中进行了系统的文献检索,涵盖2000年至2024年期间。检索策略基于与四个主要概念相关的关键词:筛查、移动应用程序、摄像头和身体活动。遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。该研究已在PROSPERO上注册(注册号:CRD42023444355),以确保透明度并防止选择性报告结果。
在最初识别的2716条记录中,八项研究符合指定的纳入标准。这些研究主要涉及健身锻炼、步态分析和特定运动项目的动作。一些研究与金标准系统相比显示出高可靠性,而其他研究则报告了技术限制,如摄像头定位和数据解读问题。反馈机制各不相同,许多应用程序缺乏个性化的实时校正。
尽管基于智能手机的运动筛查应用程序具有潜力,特别是其可及性和可承受性,但在准确性和用户反馈方面仍存在挑战。与既定方法相当的精确测量对于基于摄像头的应用型运动筛查至关重要。同样重要的是改善实时反馈、扩大可评估的运动类型,并确保在不同人群和环境中的广泛适用性,以确保基于应用程序的运动筛查的可持续使用。