Suppr超能文献

对主要皮肤科协会在线患者教育材料的评估。

Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Dermatologic Associations.

作者信息

John Ann M, John Elizabeth S, Hansberry David R, Lambert William Clark

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016 Sep;9(9):23-28. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

Abstract

Patients increasingly use the internet to find medical information regarding their conditions and treatments. Physicians often supplement visits with written education materials. Online patient education materials from major dermatologic associations should be written at appropriate reading levels to optimize utility for patients. The purpose of this study is to assess online patient education materials from major dermatologic associations and determine if they are written at the fourth to sixth grade level recommended by the American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health. This is a descriptive and correlational design. Academic institution. Patient education materials from eight major dermatology websites were downloaded and assessed using 10 readability scales. A one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's Honestly Statistically Different analysis were performed to determine the difference in readability levels between websites. Two hundred and sixty patient education materials were assessed. Collectively, patient education materials were written at a mean grade level of 11.13, with 65.8 percent of articles written above a tenth grade level and no articles written at the American Medical Association/National Institutes of Health recommended grade levels. Analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference between websites for each reading scale (p<0.001), which was confirmed with Tukey's Honestly Statistically Different analysis. Online patient education materials from major dermatologic association websites are written well above recommended reading levels. Associations should consider revising patient education materials to allow more effective patient comprehension. (J 2016;9(9):23-28.).

摘要

患者越来越多地利用互联网查找有关自身病情和治疗的医学信息。医生经常用书面教育材料来辅助诊疗。主要皮肤科协会的在线患者教育材料应以适当的阅读水平编写,以优化对患者的实用性。本研究的目的是评估主要皮肤科协会的在线患者教育材料,并确定它们是否是按照美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院推荐的四至六年级水平编写的。这是一种描述性和相关性设计。学术机构。从八个主要皮肤科网站下载患者教育材料,并使用10种可读性量表进行评估。进行单因素方差分析和杜凯多重比较分析,以确定各网站之间可读性水平的差异。共评估了260份患者教育材料。总体而言,患者教育材料的平均年级水平为11.13,65.8%的文章高于十年级水平,没有文章是按照美国医学协会/国立卫生研究院推荐的年级水平编写的。方差分析表明,各网站在每种阅读量表上存在显著差异(p<0.001),杜凯多重比较分析证实了这一点。主要皮肤科协会网站的在线患者教育材料的编写水平远高于推荐的阅读水平。协会应考虑修订患者教育材料,以提高患者的理解效果。(《皮肤病学杂志》2016年;9(9):23 - 28.)

相似文献

1
Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Dermatologic Associations.
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016 Sep;9(9):23-28. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
4
Readability assessment of patient education materials on major otolaryngology association websites.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Nov;147(5):848-54. doi: 10.1177/0194599812456152. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
5
Evaluating the complexity of online patient education materials about brain aneurysms published by major academic institutions.
J Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;127(2):278-283. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.JNS16793. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
7
Readability of Spine-Related Patient Education Materials From Leading Orthopedic Academic Centers.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May;41(9):E561-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001321.
8
Radiation Oncology and Online Patient Education Materials: Deviating From NIH and AMA Recommendations.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 1;96(3):521-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.2449. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
9
Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials.
J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):1048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.255. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
10
A quantitative readability analysis of patient education resources from gastroenterology society websites.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jun;32(6):917-920. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2730-3. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the readability and quality of online patient information for laser tattooremoval.
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jul 17;39(1):183. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04110-2.
2
Analysis of the Content and Comprehensiveness of Dermatology Residency Training Websites in Taiwan.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 21;9(6):773. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060773.
4
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):1932-1935. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5383-9. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Aug;27(5):401-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
2
Readability of patient education materials from professional societies in radiation oncology: are we meeting the national standard?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Apr 1;91(5):1108-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.12.035.
4
Readability of Written Materials for CKD Patients: A Systematic Review.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jun;65(6):842-50. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.025. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
5
Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1181-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4071-2. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
7
A critical review of the readability of online patient education resources from RadiologyInfo.Org.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):566-75. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11223.
8
Readability of Patient-oriented Online Dermatology Resources.
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 Mar;4(3):27-33.
9
Health literacy and functional health status among older adults.
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Sep 26;165(17):1946-52. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.17.1946.
10
Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys.
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Jan;75(1):8-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032. Epub 2005 Aug 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验