John Ann M, John Elizabeth S, Hansberry David R, Lambert William Clark
Department of Dermatology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016 Sep;9(9):23-28. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
Patients increasingly use the internet to find medical information regarding their conditions and treatments. Physicians often supplement visits with written education materials. Online patient education materials from major dermatologic associations should be written at appropriate reading levels to optimize utility for patients. The purpose of this study is to assess online patient education materials from major dermatologic associations and determine if they are written at the fourth to sixth grade level recommended by the American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health. This is a descriptive and correlational design. Academic institution. Patient education materials from eight major dermatology websites were downloaded and assessed using 10 readability scales. A one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's Honestly Statistically Different analysis were performed to determine the difference in readability levels between websites. Two hundred and sixty patient education materials were assessed. Collectively, patient education materials were written at a mean grade level of 11.13, with 65.8 percent of articles written above a tenth grade level and no articles written at the American Medical Association/National Institutes of Health recommended grade levels. Analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference between websites for each reading scale (p<0.001), which was confirmed with Tukey's Honestly Statistically Different analysis. Online patient education materials from major dermatologic association websites are written well above recommended reading levels. Associations should consider revising patient education materials to allow more effective patient comprehension. (J 2016;9(9):23-28.).
患者越来越多地利用互联网查找有关自身病情和治疗的医学信息。医生经常用书面教育材料来辅助诊疗。主要皮肤科协会的在线患者教育材料应以适当的阅读水平编写,以优化对患者的实用性。本研究的目的是评估主要皮肤科协会的在线患者教育材料,并确定它们是否是按照美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院推荐的四至六年级水平编写的。这是一种描述性和相关性设计。学术机构。从八个主要皮肤科网站下载患者教育材料,并使用10种可读性量表进行评估。进行单因素方差分析和杜凯多重比较分析,以确定各网站之间可读性水平的差异。共评估了260份患者教育材料。总体而言,患者教育材料的平均年级水平为11.13,65.8%的文章高于十年级水平,没有文章是按照美国医学协会/国立卫生研究院推荐的年级水平编写的。方差分析表明,各网站在每种阅读量表上存在显著差异(p<0.001),杜凯多重比较分析证实了这一点。主要皮肤科协会网站的在线患者教育材料的编写水平远高于推荐的阅读水平。协会应考虑修订患者教育材料,以提高患者的理解效果。(《皮肤病学杂志》2016年;9(9):23 - 28.)