• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估激光去除纹身的在线患者信息的可读性和质量。

Assessing the readability and quality of online patient information for laser tattooremoval.

机构信息

University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jul 17;39(1):183. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04110-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10103-024-04110-2
PMID:39014050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11252190/
Abstract

Just as tattoos continue to increase in popularity, many people with tattoos also seek removal, often due to career concerns. Prospective clients interested in laser tattoo removal may do research about the procedure online, as the internet increasingly becomes a resource to get preliminary health information. However, it is important that the online health information on the topic be of high quality and be accessible to all patients. We analyzed 77 websites from a Google search query using the terms "Laser tattoo removal patient Information" and "Laser tattoo removal patient Instructions" to assess this. The websites were evaluated for their readability using multiple validated indices and comprehensiveness. We found that websites had a broad readability range, from elementary to college, though most were above the recommended eighth-grade reading level. Less than half of the websites adequately discussed the increased risk of pigmentary complications in the skin of color clients or emphasized the importance of consulting with a board-certified dermatologist/plastic surgeon before the procedure. Over 90% of the websites noted that multiple laser treatments are likely needed for complete clearance of tattoos. The findings from our study underscore a significant gap in the accessibility and quality of online information for patients considering laser tattoo removal, particularly in addressing specific risks for patients with darker skin tones and emphasizing the need for consulting a board-certified physician before undergoing the procedure. It is important that online resources for laser tattoo removal be appropriately written to allow better decision-making, expectations, and future satisfaction for potential clients interested in the procedure.

摘要

随着纹身的流行,许多纹身者也寻求去除纹身,这通常是出于职业考虑。有兴趣接受激光纹身去除的潜在客户可能会在网上搜索相关信息,因为互联网越来越成为获取初步健康信息的资源。然而,重要的是,关于该主题的在线健康信息质量要高,并且所有患者都能获取。我们使用“激光纹身去除患者信息”和“激光纹身去除患者说明”这两个术语,对谷歌搜索查询结果中的 77 个网站进行了分析,以评估其质量。我们使用多个经过验证的指标和全面性评估标准来评估这些网站的可读性。我们发现,这些网站的可读性范围很广,从小学到大学都有,但大多数都高于推荐的八年级阅读水平。不到一半的网站充分讨论了有色人种皮肤客户色素并发症风险增加的问题,或强调在进行该程序之前咨询认证皮肤科医生/整形外科医生的重要性。超过 90%的网站指出,需要多次激光治疗才能完全清除纹身。我们的研究结果突显了患者在考虑激光纹身去除时,获取在线信息的可及性和质量存在显著差距,尤其是在解决皮肤较深的患者的特定风险以及强调在进行该程序之前咨询认证医生的必要性方面。为了使对该程序感兴趣的潜在客户能够更好地做出决策、了解预期并获得未来的满意度,激光纹身去除的在线资源必须以适当的方式编写。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/11252190/586eb78368a9/10103_2024_4110_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/11252190/4484030e490f/10103_2024_4110_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/11252190/afd1806f3e57/10103_2024_4110_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/11252190/586eb78368a9/10103_2024_4110_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/11252190/4484030e490f/10103_2024_4110_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/11252190/afd1806f3e57/10103_2024_4110_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/11252190/586eb78368a9/10103_2024_4110_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the readability and quality of online patient information for laser tattooremoval.评估激光去除纹身的在线患者信息的可读性和质量。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jul 17;39(1):183. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04110-2.
2
A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.对谷歌搜索查询及在线妇科肿瘤患者教育材料可读性的系统评估
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):435-440. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1319-z.
3
Online resources for strabismus: an evaluation of readability, complexity, and suitability.斜视的在线资源:可读性、复杂性和适用性评估
Strabismus. 2025 Mar;33(1):36-43. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2024.2408029. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
4
Readability and Quality Evaluation of Thyroidectomy Websites: A Systematic Review.甲状腺切除术网站的可读性和质量评估:系统评价。
J Surg Res. 2024 Nov;303:652-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.052. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
5
Quality and Readability of Online Health Information on Common Urologic Cancers: Assessing Barriers to Health Literacy in Urologic Oncology.常见泌尿系统癌症的在线健康信息质量和可读性:评估泌尿系统肿瘤学中健康素养的障碍。
Urol Pract. 2024 Jul;11(4):670-676. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000574. Epub 2024 May 16.
6
The readability of online patient information about laser resurfacing therapy.关于激光表面重塑疗法的在线患者信息的可读性。
Dermatol Online J. 2020 Apr 15;26(4):13030/qt5t9882ct.
7
Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.对颈部提升术在线信息的质量、可读性及技术方面的批判性分析
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):115-120. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1219.
8
Evaluating Health Literacy Resources for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in End-Stage Kidney Disease.评估终末期肾病继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症的健康素养资源。
J Surg Res. 2024 Sep;301:540-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Quality and readability of online information and materials on post-surgery breast seroma.关于术后乳腺血清肿的在线信息及资料的质量与可读性
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2024 Jun 30;85(6):1-9. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0058.
10
Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.互联网上食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)患者信息质量和可读性分析。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct 29;2018:2849390. doi: 10.1155/2018/2849390. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Readability assessment of online patient education materials for central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia.中心离心性瘢痕性脱发在线患者教育材料的可读性评估
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2023 Aug 9;9(3):e105. doi: 10.1097/JW9.0000000000000105. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
A Descriptive Analysis of the Epidemiology and Motivations for Laser Tattoo Removal in an Underserved Population.对服务不足人群中激光去除纹身的流行病学和动机进行描述性分析。
J Community Health. 2022 Feb;47(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s10900-021-01024-w. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
3
Health Literacy, Social Determinants of Health, and Disease Prevention and Control.
健康素养、健康的社会决定因素以及疾病预防与控制。
J Environ Health Sci. 2020;6(1). Epub 2020 Dec 16.
4
Comparison of Readability of Official Public Health Information About COVID-19 on Websites of International Agencies and the Governments of 15 Countries.比较国际机构网站和 15 个国家政府网站上关于 COVID-19 的官方公共卫生信息的可读性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2018033. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18033.
5
Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Dermatologic Associations.对主要皮肤科协会在线患者教育材料的评估。
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016 Sep;9(9):23-28. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Patient Education Materials in Dermatology: Addressing the Health Literacy Needs of Patients.皮肤科患者教育材料:满足患者的健康素养需求
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):946-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1135.
7
The Relationship between Health Literacy and Health Disparities: A Systematic Review.健康素养与健康差距之间的关系:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145455. eCollection 2015.
8
Health Literacy in Primary Care Practice.基层医疗实践中的健康素养
Am Fam Physician. 2015 Jul 15;92(2):118-24.
9
Laser tattoo removal: a clinical update.激光纹身去除:临床进展
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;8(1):9-15. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.155066.
10
The risks of do-it-yourself and over-the-counter devices for tattoo removal.自行操作及非处方纹身去除设备的风险。
Int J Dermatol. 2015 Jan;54(1):13-8. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12613.