• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?

作者信息

Wongworawat M Daniel

机构信息

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 1600 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19013, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):1932-1935. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5383-9. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-017-5383-9
PMID:28616756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5498393/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?编辑聚焦/速览：骨科患者报告结局测量的可读性：是否存在根本的沟通障碍？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):1932-1935. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5383-9. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
2
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.编辑聚焦/五分钟速览：美国矫形外科医师学会的大多数在线患者教育资料超过了普通患者的阅读水平。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1177-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4151-y. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
3
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Do Orthopaedic Surgeons Acknowledge Uncertainty?编辑聚焦/速览5：骨科医生是否承认存在不确定性？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1356-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4708-4. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
4
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Physicians' Attire Influences Patients' Perceptions in the Urban Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery Setting.编辑聚焦/五分钟速览：在城市门诊骨科手术环境中，医生着装影响患者认知。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):1904-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4938-5. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Fewer Than One in 20 Current Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons Have Obtained National Institutes of Health Funding.编辑聚焦/速览：当前每20名学术骨科医生中获得美国国立卫生研究院资助的人数不到1人。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jul 1;481(7):1261-1264. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002724. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Letter to the Editor: Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Physicians' Attire Influences Patients' Perceptions in the Urban Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery Setting.致编辑的信：编辑聚焦/五分钟速览：在城市门诊骨科手术环境中，医生着装影响患者认知。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2545-2546. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5049-z. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: How Do Medical Students Perceive Diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery, and How Do Their Perceptions Change After an Orthopaedic Clinical Rotation?编辑聚焦/五分钟速览：医学生如何看待骨科手术中的多样性，以及他们在骨科临床轮转后的看法有何变化？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Mar 1;479(3):430-433. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001665.
8
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Race, But Not Gender, Is Associated With Admissions Into Orthopaedic Residency Programs.编辑聚焦/五分钟速览：种族而非性别与骨科住院医师培训项目的录取相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Aug 1;480(8):1435-1440. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001627. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
9
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: How Long Will It Take to Reach Gender Parity in Orthopaedic Surgery in the United States? An Analysis of the National Provider Identifier Registry.编辑聚焦/五分钟速览：美国骨科手术实现性别平等需要多长时间？对国家提供者标识符注册库的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jun 1;479(6):1175-1178. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001805.
10
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Is Our Science Representative? A Systematic Review of Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials from 2000 to 2020.编辑聚焦/五分钟速览：我们的科学具有代表性吗？对2000年至2020年骨科临床试验中种族和民族多样性的系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 May 1;480(5):843-847. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002193. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Resources for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery?患者能否阅读、理解并依据前交叉韧带手术的在线资源采取行动？
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jul 28;10(7):23259671221089977. doi: 10.1177/23259671221089977. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养：在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of readability, understandability, and completeness of pediatric hospital medicine discharge instructions.评估儿科医院出院指导的可读性、易懂性和完整性。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Feb;12(2):98-101. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2688.
2
Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Dermatologic Associations.对主要皮肤科协会在线患者教育材料的评估。
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016 Sep;9(9):23-28. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
Characteristics of outpatient clinical summaries in the United States.美国门诊临床总结的特点。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
4
Is the Readability of Spine-Related Patient Education Material Improving?: An Assessment of Subspecialty Websites.与脊柱相关的患者教育材料的可读性是否在提高？：对亚专业网站的评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jun;41(12):1041-1048. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001446.
5
Evaluation of the Readability of Dermatological Postoperative Patient Information Leaflets Across England.英格兰皮肤科术后患者信息手册可读性评估
Dermatol Surg. 2016 Jun;42(6):757-63. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000720.
6
A Mismatch Between Patient Education Materials About Sickle Cell Disease and the Literacy Level of Their Intended Audience.关于镰状细胞病的患者教育材料与其目标受众的识字水平之间的不匹配。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 May 12;13:E64. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150478.
7
Are patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedics easily read by patients?骨科中患者报告的结局指标对患者来说是否易于理解？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):246-55. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4595-0.
8
Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.美国矫形外科医师学会的大多数在线患者教育材料超过了普通患者的阅读水平。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1181-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4071-2. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
9
Improving the readability of online foot and ankle patient education materials.提高在线足踝患者教育材料的可读性。
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Dec;35(12):1282-6. doi: 10.1177/1071100714550650. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
10
Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations.评估阅读公式差异与书面健康信息材料：应用、结果和建议。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):503-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jul 25.