Zhou Weiqi, Troy Austin, Grove Morgan
Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, George D. Aiken Center, 81 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Northeastern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, South Burlington, VT 05403, USA.
Sensors (Basel). 2008 Mar 10;8(3):1613-1636. doi: 10.3390/s8031613.
Accurate and timely information about land cover pattern and change in urbanareas is crucial for urban land management decision-making, ecosystem monitoring andurban planning. This paper presents the methods and results of an object-basedclassification and post-classification change detection of multitemporal high-spatialresolution Emerge aerial imagery in the Gwynns Falls watershed from 1999 to 2004. TheGwynns Falls watershed includes portions of Baltimore City and Baltimore County,Maryland, USA. An object-based approach was first applied to implement the land coverclassification separately for each of the two years. The overall accuracies of theclassification maps of 1999 and 2004 were 92.3% and 93.7%, respectively. Following theclassification, we conducted a comparison of two different land cover change detectionmethods: traditional (i.e., pixel-based) post-classification comparison and object-basedpost-classification comparison. The results from our analyses indicated that an objectbasedapproach provides a better means for change detection than a pixel based methodbecause it provides an effective way to incorporate spatial information and expertknowledge into the change detection process. The overall accuracy of the change mapproduced by the object-based method was 90.0%, with Kappa statistic of 0.854, whereasthe overall accuracy and Kappa statistic of that by the pixel-based method were 81.3% and0.712, respectively.
准确及时地掌握城市地区土地覆盖格局及其变化情况,对于城市土地管理决策、生态系统监测和城市规划至关重要。本文介绍了基于对象的分类方法以及对1999年至2004年期间格温斯瀑布流域多期高空间分辨率Emerge航空影像进行分类后变化检测的方法和结果。格温斯瀑布流域包括美国马里兰州巴尔的摩市和巴尔的摩县的部分地区。首先采用基于对象的方法分别对这两年的土地覆盖进行分类。1999年和2004年分类图的总体精度分别为92.3%和93.7%。分类之后,我们对两种不同的土地覆盖变化检测方法进行了比较:传统的(即基于像元的)分类后比较和基于对象的分类后比较。分析结果表明,基于对象的方法比基于像元的方法提供了更好的变化检测手段,因为它提供了一种将空间信息和专家知识纳入变化检测过程的有效方法。基于对象的方法生成的变化图总体精度为90.0%,卡帕系数为0.854,而基于像元的方法的总体精度和卡帕系数分别为81.3%和0.712。