• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的减肥手术治疗:临床和成本效益分析。

Bariatric surgery for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2017 Apr;65(4):1156-1164. doi: 10.1002/hep.28958. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1002/hep.28958
PMID:27880977
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) affects 2%-3% of the US population and is expected to become the leading indication for liver transplantation in the next decade. Bariatric surgery may be an effective but expensive treatment for NASH. Using a state-transition model, our analysis assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgery to manage NASH. We simulated the benefits and harms of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in patients defined by weight class (overweight, mild obesity, moderate obesity, and severe obesity) and fibrosis stage (F0-F3). Comparators included intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) and no treatment. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Our results showed that surgery and ILI in obese patients (with F0-F3) increased QALYs by 0.678-2.152 and 0.452-0.618, respectively, compared with no treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for surgery in all F0-F3 patients with mild, moderate, or severe obesity were $48,836/QALY, $24,949/QALY, and $19,222/QALY, respectively. In overweight patients (with F0-F3), surgery increased QALYs by 0.050-0.824 and ILI increased QALYs by 0.031-0.164. In overweight patients, it was cost-effective to reserve treatment only for F3 patients; the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for providing surgery or ILI only to F3 patients were $30,484/QALY and $25,367/QALY, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery was both effective and cost-effective for obese patients with NASH, regardless of fibrosis stage; in overweight patients, surgery increased QALYs for all patients regardless of fibrosis stage, but was cost-effective only for patients with F3 fibrosis; our results highlight the promise of bariatric surgery for treating NASH and underscore the need for clinical trials in this area. (Hepatology 2017;65:1156-1164).

摘要

背景

非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)影响美国人群的 2%-3%,预计在未来十年内将成为肝移植的主要指征。减重手术可能是治疗 NASH 的有效但昂贵的方法。使用状态转移模型,我们的分析评估了手术治疗 NASH 的效果和成本效益。我们模拟了腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术在体重类别(超重、轻度肥胖、中度肥胖和重度肥胖)和纤维化阶段(F0-F3)定义的患者中的益处和危害。对照包括强化生活方式干预(ILI)和不治疗。计算了质量调整生命年(QALY)、成本和增量成本效益比。

结果

在肥胖患者(F0-F3)中,手术和 ILI 分别使 QALY 增加了 0.678-2.152 和 0.452-0.618,与不治疗相比。在所有 F0-F3 肥胖患者中,手术的增量成本效益比分别为$48836/QALY、$24949/QALY 和$19222/QALY,轻度、中度和重度肥胖患者。在超重患者(F0-F3)中,手术使 QALY 增加了 0.050-0.824,ILI 使 QALY 增加了 0.031-0.164。对于超重患者,仅为 F3 患者保留治疗是具有成本效益的;仅为 F3 患者提供手术或 ILI 的增量成本效益比分别为$30484/QALY 和$25367/QALY。

结论

手术对 NASH 肥胖患者无论纤维化阶段如何均有效且具有成本效益;在超重患者中,手术使所有患者的 QALY 增加,无论纤维化阶段如何,但仅对 F3 纤维化患者具有成本效益;我们的结果突显了减重手术治疗 NASH 的前景,并强调了该领域临床试验的必要性。

相似文献

1
Bariatric surgery for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis.非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的减肥手术治疗:临床和成本效益分析。
Hepatology. 2017 Apr;65(4):1156-1164. doi: 10.1002/hep.28958. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
2
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Bariatric Surgery for Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Cirrhosis.非酒精性脂肪性肝炎肝硬化患者行减重手术的成本效果分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e190047. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0047.
3
Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Medical Therapy, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Gastric Bypass in Patients With Severe Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.严重肥胖合并 2 型糖尿病患者的药物治疗、袖状胃切除术和胃旁路手术的成本效果估计。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148317. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48317.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Morbidly Obese: A Computer Model-Based Evaluation.病态肥胖患者全膝关节置换术前减重手术的成本效益:基于计算机模型的评估
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 20;98(2):e6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00416.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents With Obesity.肥胖青少年行减重手术的成本效益分析。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):136-141. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3640.
6
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness of Aspiration Therapy vs Bariatric Surgery and No Treatment for Morbid Obesity.严重肥胖症患者行抽吸治疗与减肥手术和不治疗相比的增量成本效果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;114(9):1470-1477. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000359.
7
Bariatric Surgery Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Morbidly Obese Patients.肥胖症手术可减轻病态肥胖患者非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的特征。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):379-88; quiz e15-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
8
The cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery.减肥手术的成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;98(9):2097-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07671.x.
9
Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery in adolescents with severe obesity in the UK.英国青少年严重肥胖症患者进行减肥手术的成本效益分析。
Clin Obes. 2018 Apr;8(2):105-113. doi: 10.1111/cob.12232. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
10
Cost-effectiveness of gastric bypass for severe obesity.胃旁路手术治疗重度肥胖的成本效益
Am J Med. 2002 Oct 15;113(6):491-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01266-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Sleeve Gastrectomy Combined With Lifestyle Interventions on Anthropometric and Health Outcomes in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.袖状胃切除术联合生活方式干预对成人人体测量学指标和健康结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Jun 9;17(6):e85587. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85587. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of duodenal-jejunal bypass sleeve device for people with obesity.十二指肠空肠旁路套筒装置用于肥胖人群的成本效益分析。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Apr 8;15(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00623-w.
3
Resmetirom and Bariatric Surgery: New Frontiers in Treating Obesity-Related Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis.
瑞美替隆与减肥手术:治疗肥胖相关代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎的新前沿
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3525-3526. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07430-y. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) Guidance Paper on Nomenclature, Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD).印度国家肝脏研究协会(INASL)关于非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)命名、诊断和治疗的指导文件。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Mar-Apr;13(2):273-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.11.014. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
5
Bariatric endoscopic-surgical therapies for NAFLD. Should they be considered viable options among current treatments?肥胖症内镜手术治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病。在当前治疗方法中,它们是否应被视为可行的选择?
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 29;13:1026444. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1026444. eCollection 2022.
6
The Impact of Bariatric-Surgery-Induced Weight Loss on Patients Undergoing Liver Transplant: A Focus on Metabolism, Pathophysiological Changes, and Outcome in Obese Patients Suffering NAFLD-Related Cirrhosis.减肥手术引起的体重减轻对接受肝移植患者的影响:聚焦于非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关肝硬化肥胖患者的代谢、病理生理变化及预后
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 8;11(18):5293. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185293.
7
Obesity and Bariatric Surgery in Australia: Future Projection of Supply and Demand, and Costs.澳大利亚的肥胖症和减重手术:供需和成本的未来预测。
Obes Surg. 2022 Sep;32(9):3013-3022. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06188-5. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
8
Transcriptomics Reveals Discordant Lipid Metabolism Effects between In Vitro Models Exposed to Elafibranor and Liver Samples of NAFLD Patients after Bariatric Surgery.转录组学揭示了暴露于 Elafibranor 的体外模型与减肥手术后非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者肝组织样本之间脂质代谢作用的差异。
Cells. 2022 Mar 4;11(5):893. doi: 10.3390/cells11050893.
9
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adults 2021: A clinical practice guideline of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), the Italian Society of Diabetology (SID) and the Italian Society of Obesity (SIO).2021年成人非酒精性脂肪性肝病:意大利肝脏研究协会(AISF)、意大利糖尿病学会(SID)和意大利肥胖学会(SIO)的临床实践指南
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Jun;27(5):1603-1619. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01287-1. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
10
Accuracy of non-invasive liver stiffness measurement and steatosis quantification in patients with severe and morbid obesity.严重和病态肥胖患者非侵入性肝硬度测量及脂肪变性定量的准确性
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2021 Oct;10(5):610-622. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-20-787.