Ridgers Nicola D, McNarry Melitta A, Mackintosh Kelly A
Deakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, .
Applied Sports Science Technology and Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Nov 23;4(4):e129. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6540.
BACKGROUND: The proliferation and popularity of wearable activity trackers (eg, Fitbit, Jawbone, Misfit) may present an opportunity to integrate such technology into physical activity interventions. While several systematic reviews have reported intervention effects of using wearable activity trackers on adults' physical activity levels, none to date have focused specifically on children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to examine the effectiveness of wearable activity trackers as a tool for increasing children's and adolescents' physical activity levels. We also examined the feasibility of using such technology in younger populations (age range 5-19 years). METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of 5 electronic databases, reference lists, and personal archives to identify articles published up until August 2016 that met the inclusion criteria. Articles were included if they (1) specifically examined the use of a wearable device within an intervention or a feasibility study; (2) included participants aged 5-19 years old; (3) had a measure of physical activity as an outcome variable for intervention studies; (4) reported process data concerning the feasibility of the device in feasibility studies; and (5) were published in English. Data were analyzed in August 2016. RESULTS: In total, we identified and analyzed 5 studies (3 intervention, 2 feasibility). Intervention delivery ranged from 19 days to 3 months, with only 1 study using a randomized controlled trial design. Wearable activity trackers were typically combined with other intervention approaches such as goal setting and researcher feedback. While intervention effects were generally positive, the reported differences were largely nonsignificant. The feasibility studies indicated that monitor comfort and design and feedback features were important factors to children and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of research concerning the effectiveness and feasibility of wearable activity trackers as a tool for increasing children's and adolescents' physical activity levels. While there are some preliminary data to suggest these devices may have the potential to increase activity levels through self-monitoring and goal setting in the short term, more research is needed to establish longer-term effects on behavior.
背景:可穿戴活动追踪器(如Fitbit、Jawbone、Misfit)的普及和流行可能为将此类技术整合到体育活动干预中提供契机。虽然已有几项系统评价报告了使用可穿戴活动追踪器对成年人身体活动水平的干预效果,但迄今为止尚无专门针对儿童和青少年的研究。 目的:本综述旨在探讨可穿戴活动追踪器作为增加儿童和青少年身体活动水平工具的有效性。我们还研究了在较年轻人群(年龄范围5 - 19岁)中使用此类技术的可行性。 方法:我们对5个电子数据库、参考文献列表和个人存档进行了系统检索,以识别截至2016年8月发表的符合纳入标准的文章。纳入的文章需满足以下条件:(1)专门在干预或可行性研究中考察了可穿戴设备的使用;(2)纳入了5 - 19岁的参与者;(3)将身体活动测量作为干预研究的结果变量;(4)在可行性研究中报告了有关设备可行性的过程数据;(5)以英文发表。数据于2016年8月进行分析。 结果:我们总共识别并分析了5项研究(3项干预研究,2项可行性研究)。干预持续时间从19天到3个月不等,只有1项研究采用了随机对照试验设计。可穿戴活动追踪器通常与其他干预方法(如目标设定和研究者反馈)相结合。虽然干预效果总体呈阳性,但报告的差异大多不显著。可行性研究表明,监测器的舒适度、设计和反馈功能对儿童和青少年来说是重要因素。 结论:关于可穿戴活动追踪器作为增加儿童和青少年身体活动水平工具的有效性和可行性的研究较少。虽然有一些初步数据表明这些设备可能有潜力通过短期自我监测和目标设定来提高活动水平,但需要更多研究来确定其对行为的长期影响。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016-11-23
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019-2-12
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016-4-27
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-6-8
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015-12-18
J Comput Mediat Commun. 2023-9
J Med Internet Res. 2025-4-9
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016-6-30
Med Ref Serv Q. 2016
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016-4
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015-12-18
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015-9
BMC Public Health. 2015-6-24
J Phys Act Health. 2014-5
J Phys Act Health. 2014-5
J Phys Act Health. 2014-5