Suppr超能文献

移动健康技术促进青少年身体活动的效果和有效性:范围综述。

Efficacy and Effectiveness of Mobile Health Technologies for Facilitating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Scoping Review.

机构信息

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 12;7(2):e11847. doi: 10.2196/11847.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing physical activity (PA) levels in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years is associated with prevention of unhealthy weight gain and improvement in cardiovascular fitness. The widespread availability of mobile health (mHealth) and wearable devices offers self-monitoring and motivational features for increasing PA levels and improving adherence to exercise programs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this scoping review was to identify the efficacy or effectiveness of mHealth intervention strategies for facilitating PA among adolescents aged 12 to 18 years.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for peer-reviewed studies published between 2008 and 2018 in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, or SportDiscus. The search terms used included mHealth or "mobile health" or apps, "physical activity" or exercise, children or adolescents or teens or "young adults" or kids, and efficacy or effectiveness. Articles published outside of the date range (July 2008 to October 2018) and non-English articles were removed before abstract review. Three reviewers assessed all abstracts against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any uncertainties or differences in opinion were discussed as a group. The inclusion criteria were that the studies should (1) have an mHealth component, (2) target participants aged between 12 and 18 years, (3) have results on efficacy or effectiveness, and (4) assess PA-related outcomes. Reviews, abstracts only, protocols without results, and short message service text messaging-only interventions were excluded. We also extracted potentially relevant papers from reviews. At least 2 reviewers examined all full articles for fit with the criteria and extracted data for analysis. Data extracted from selected studies included study population, study type, components of PA intervention, and PA outcome results.

RESULTS

Overall, 126 articles were initially identified. Reviewers pulled 18 additional articles from excluded review papers. Only 18 articles were passed onto full review, and 16 were kept for analysis. The included studies differed in the sizes of the study populations (11-607 participants), locations of the study sites (7 countries), study setting, and study design. Overall, 5 mHealth intervention categories were identified: website, website+wearable, app, wearable+app, and website+wearable+app. The most common measures reported were subjective weekly PA (4/13) and objective daily moderate-to-vigorous PA (5/13) of the 19 different PA outcomes assessed. Furthermore, 5 of 13 studies with a control or comparison group showed a significant improvement in PA outcomes between the intervention group and the control or comparison group. Of those 5 studies, 3 permitted isolation of mHealth intervention components in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

PA outcomes for adolescents improved over time through mHealth intervention use; however, the lack of consistency in chosen PA outcome measures, paucity of significant outcomes via between-group analyses, and the various study designs that prevent separating the effects of intervention components calls into question their true effect.

摘要

背景

在 12 至 18 岁的青少年中增加身体活动 (PA) 水平与预防不健康的体重增加和改善心血管健康有关。移动健康 (mHealth) 和可穿戴设备的广泛应用为提高 PA 水平和提高锻炼计划的依从性提供了自我监测和激励功能。

目的

本范围综述的目的是确定 mHealth 干预策略在促进 12 至 18 岁青少年 PA 方面的功效或有效性。

方法

我们在以下电子数据库中进行了系统搜索,以查找 2008 年至 2018 年期间发表的同行评审研究:PubMed、Google Scholar、PsychINFO 或 SportDiscus。使用的搜索词包括 mHealth 或“移动健康”或应用程序、“身体活动”或运动、儿童或青少年或青少年或“年轻人”或孩子,以及功效或有效性。在摘要审查之前,删除了发表时间范围(2008 年 7 月至 2018 年 10 月)之外的文章和非英语文章。三名评审员根据纳入和排除标准评估了所有摘要。任何不确定或意见分歧均作为一个小组进行讨论。纳入标准是研究应 (1) 具有 mHealth 组成部分,(2) 以 12 至 18 岁的参与者为目标,(3) 具有功效或有效性结果,以及 (4) 评估与 PA 相关的结果。排除了综述、仅摘要、无结果的方案和仅短信服务文本消息干预措施。我们还从综述中提取了潜在相关的论文。至少有 2 名评审员检查了所有全文是否符合标准,并提取了用于分析的数据。从选定的研究中提取的数据包括研究人群、研究类型、PA 干预组成部分和 PA 结果。

结果

总共最初确定了 126 篇文章。评审员从排除的综述文章中提取了 18 篇额外的文章。只有 18 篇文章通过了完整的审查,其中 16 篇保留用于分析。纳入的研究在研究人群的规模(11-607 名参与者)、研究地点(7 个国家)、研究环境和研究设计方面存在差异。总体而言,确定了 5 种 mHealth 干预类别:网站、网站+可穿戴设备、应用程序、可穿戴设备+应用程序和网站+可穿戴设备+应用程序。报告的最常见措施是主观每周 PA(4/13)和客观每日中度至剧烈 PA(5/13)评估的 19 种不同 PA 结果中的 13 种。此外,在 13 项具有对照组或比较组的研究中,有 5 项显示干预组和对照组或比较组之间的 PA 结果有显著改善。在这 5 项研究中,有 3 项研究允许在分析中分离 mHealth 干预成分。

结论

青少年的 PA 结果随着时间的推移通过 mHealth 干预使用而得到改善;然而,由于所选 PA 结果测量的一致性差、组间分析中显著结果的缺乏以及各种研究设计阻止了干预成分效果的分离,这引起了对其真实效果的质疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce19/6390191/554336e7dcf8/mhealth_v7i2e11847_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验