Suppr超能文献

解读达尔文的复杂生态群落:具有多种相互作用类型的互利共生网络的架构与稳健性

Unravelling Darwin's entangled bank: architecture and robustness of mutualistic networks with multiple interaction types.

作者信息

Dáttilo Wesley, Lara-Rodríguez Nubia, Jordano Pedro, Guimarães Paulo R, Thompson John N, Marquis Robert J, Medeiros Lucas P, Ortiz-Pulido Raul, Marcos-García Maria A, Rico-Gray Victor

机构信息

Red de Ecoetología, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Carretera Antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico

Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad (CIBIO), Universidad de Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 30;283(1843). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1564.

Abstract

Trying to unravel Darwin's entangled bank further, we describe the architecture of a network involving multiple forms of mutualism (pollination by animals, seed dispersal by birds and plant protection by ants) and evaluate whether this multi-network shows evidence of a structure that promotes robustness. We found that species differed strongly in their contributions to the organization of the multi-interaction network, and that only a few species contributed to the structuring of these patterns. Moreover, we observed that the multi-interaction networks did not enhance community robustness compared with each of the three independent mutualistic networks when analysed across a range of simulated scenarios of species extinction. By simulating the removal of highly interacting species, we observed that, overall, these species enhance network nestedness and robustness, but decrease modularity. We discuss how the organization of interlinked mutualistic networks may be essential for the maintenance of ecological communities, and therefore the long-term ecological and evolutionary dynamics of interactive, species-rich communities. We suggest that conserving these keystone mutualists and their interactions is crucial to the persistence of species-rich mutualistic assemblages, mainly because they support other species and shape the network organization.

摘要

为了进一步解开达尔文的“纠结之岸”之谜,我们描述了一个涉及多种互利共生形式(动物传粉、鸟类种子传播和蚂蚁植物保护)的网络架构,并评估这个多网络是否显示出促进稳健性的结构证据。我们发现,物种对多相互作用网络组织的贡献差异很大,只有少数物种对这些模式的构建有贡献。此外,我们观察到,在一系列物种灭绝的模拟情景中进行分析时,与三个独立的互利共生网络中的每一个相比,多相互作用网络并没有增强群落的稳健性。通过模拟去除高度相互作用的物种,我们观察到,总体而言,这些物种增强了网络的嵌套性和稳健性,但降低了模块性。我们讨论了相互关联的互利共生网络的组织对于生态群落的维持可能是至关重要的,因此对于互动的、物种丰富的群落的长期生态和进化动态也是至关重要的。我们认为,保护这些关键的互利共生者及其相互作用对于物种丰富的互利共生组合的持续存在至关重要,主要是因为它们支持其他物种并塑造网络组织。

相似文献

2
Network dynamics contribute to structure: nestedness in mutualistic networks.
Bull Math Biol. 2013 Dec;75(12):2372-88. doi: 10.1007/s11538-013-9896-4. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
3
Long-term temporal variation in the organization of an ant-plant network.
Ann Bot. 2013 Jun;111(6):1285-93. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct071.
5
Indirect effects drive coevolution in mutualistic networks.
Nature. 2017 Oct 26;550(7677):511-514. doi: 10.1038/nature24273. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
6
Distinct responses of antagonistic and mutualistic networks to agricultural intensification.
Ecology. 2020 Oct;101(10):e03116. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3116. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
7
Topological plasticity increases robustness of mutualistic networks.
J Anim Ecol. 2012 Jul;81(4):896-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01960.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
9
Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks.
Nature. 2013 Aug 22;500(7463):449-52. doi: 10.1038/nature12438.
10
Moving from frugivory to seed dispersal: Incorporating the functional outcomes of interactions in plant-frugivore networks.
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jul;87(4):995-1007. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12831. Epub 2018 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Interconnecting fragmented forests: Small and mobile birds are cornerstones in the plant-frugivore meta-network.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 18;122(7):e2415846122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2415846122. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
2
The disruption of birds' double mutualistic interactions in novel ecosystems.
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Oct;291(2033):20241872. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1872. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
3
The structure and robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jan 19;20(1):e1011770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011770. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Extinction, coextinction and colonization dynamics in plant-hummingbird networks under climate change.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Jun;6(6):720-729. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01693-3. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
8
The frugivory network properties of a simplified ecosystem: Birds and plants in a Neotropical periurban park.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Aug 4;10(16):8579-8591. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6481. eCollection 2020 Aug.
10
Small vertebrates are key elements in the frugivory networks of a hyperdiverse tropical forest.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 29;10(1):10594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67326-6.

本文引用的文献

3
Correlated loss of ecosystem services in coupled mutualistic networks.
Nat Commun. 2014 May 8;5:3810. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4810.
4
Diversity of interaction types and ecological community stability.
Science. 2012 Jul 20;337(6092):349-51. doi: 10.1126/science.1220529.
5
The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks.
Science. 2012 Feb 24;335(6071):973-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1214915.
6
The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks.
Ecol Lett. 2011 Nov;14(11):1170-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01688.x. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
7
Strong contributors to network persistence are the most vulnerable to extinction.
Nature. 2011 Sep 14;478(7368):233-5. doi: 10.1038/nature10433.
8
Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks.
Ecol Lett. 2011 Sep;14(9):877-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01649.x. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
9
The modularity of seed dispersal: differences in structure and robustness between bat- and bird-fruit networks.
Oecologia. 2011 Sep;167(1):131-40. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-1984-2. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
10
Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks.
Science. 2010 Aug 13;329(5993):853-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1188321.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验