Dáttilo Wesley, Lara-Rodríguez Nubia, Jordano Pedro, Guimarães Paulo R, Thompson John N, Marquis Robert J, Medeiros Lucas P, Ortiz-Pulido Raul, Marcos-García Maria A, Rico-Gray Victor
Red de Ecoetología, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Carretera Antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad (CIBIO), Universidad de Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 30;283(1843). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1564.
Trying to unravel Darwin's entangled bank further, we describe the architecture of a network involving multiple forms of mutualism (pollination by animals, seed dispersal by birds and plant protection by ants) and evaluate whether this multi-network shows evidence of a structure that promotes robustness. We found that species differed strongly in their contributions to the organization of the multi-interaction network, and that only a few species contributed to the structuring of these patterns. Moreover, we observed that the multi-interaction networks did not enhance community robustness compared with each of the three independent mutualistic networks when analysed across a range of simulated scenarios of species extinction. By simulating the removal of highly interacting species, we observed that, overall, these species enhance network nestedness and robustness, but decrease modularity. We discuss how the organization of interlinked mutualistic networks may be essential for the maintenance of ecological communities, and therefore the long-term ecological and evolutionary dynamics of interactive, species-rich communities. We suggest that conserving these keystone mutualists and their interactions is crucial to the persistence of species-rich mutualistic assemblages, mainly because they support other species and shape the network organization.
为了进一步解开达尔文的“纠结之岸”之谜,我们描述了一个涉及多种互利共生形式(动物传粉、鸟类种子传播和蚂蚁植物保护)的网络架构,并评估这个多网络是否显示出促进稳健性的结构证据。我们发现,物种对多相互作用网络组织的贡献差异很大,只有少数物种对这些模式的构建有贡献。此外,我们观察到,在一系列物种灭绝的模拟情景中进行分析时,与三个独立的互利共生网络中的每一个相比,多相互作用网络并没有增强群落的稳健性。通过模拟去除高度相互作用的物种,我们观察到,总体而言,这些物种增强了网络的嵌套性和稳健性,但降低了模块性。我们讨论了相互关联的互利共生网络的组织对于生态群落的维持可能是至关重要的,因此对于互动的、物种丰富的群落的长期生态和进化动态也是至关重要的。我们认为,保护这些关键的互利共生者及其相互作用对于物种丰富的互利共生组合的持续存在至关重要,主要是因为它们支持其他物种并塑造网络组织。