Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, Oslo, NO-0316, Norway.
School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 24;6:37347. doi: 10.1038/srep37347.
The majority of archaeological plant material is preserved in a charred state. Obtaining reliable ancient DNA data from these remains has presented challenges due to high rates of nucleotide damage, short DNA fragment lengths, low endogenous DNA content and the potential for modern contamination. It has been suggested that high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies coupled with DNA enrichment techniques may overcome some of these limitations. Here we report the findings of HTS and target enrichment on four important archaeological crops (barley, grape, maize and rice) performed in three different laboratories, presenting the largest HTS assessment of charred archaeobotanical specimens to date. Rigorous analysis of our data - excluding false-positives due to background contamination or incorrect index assignments - indicated a lack of endogenous DNA in nearly all samples, except for one lightly-charred maize cob. Even with target enrichment, this sample failed to yield adequate data required to address fundamental questions in archaeology and biology. We further reanalysed part of an existing dataset on charred plant material, and found all purported endogenous DNA sequences were likely to be spurious. We suggest these technologies are not suitable for use with charred archaeobotanicals and urge great caution when interpreting data obtained by HTS of these remains.
大多数考古植物材料以碳化状态保存。由于核苷酸损伤率高、DNA 片段长度短、内源性 DNA 含量低以及现代污染的潜在可能性,从这些遗骸中获取可靠的古代 DNA 数据具有挑战性。有人认为,高通量测序 (HTS) 技术与 DNA 富集技术相结合可能会克服其中的一些限制。在这里,我们报告了在三个不同实验室对四个重要考古作物(大麦、葡萄、玉米和水稻)进行的 HTS 和靶向富集的结果,这是迄今为止对碳化考古植物标本进行的最大 HTS 评估。对我们数据的严格分析——排除由于背景污染或不正确索引分配导致的假阳性——表明除了一个轻度碳化的玉米穗外,几乎所有样本中都缺乏内源性 DNA。即使进行了靶向富集,该样本也未能产生解决考古学和生物学基本问题所需的足够数据。我们进一步重新分析了部分现有的碳化植物材料数据集,并发现所有据称的内源性 DNA 序列都可能是虚假的。我们建议这些技术不适合碳化考古植物材料的使用,并强烈呼吁在解释这些残留物的 HTS 获得的数据时要格外小心。