Weinstein Deborah
Brown University, American Studies, Box 1886, Providence, RI 02912, United States.
Endeavour. 2016 Dec;40(4):256-267. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
Why do people fight wars? Following the devastation of the Second World War, this question became particularly pressing. Postwar scholars in the human sciences, from political science to anthropology, investigated the role of human nature in the causes of war even as they debated the very meaning of human nature itself. Among the wide-ranging efforts of postwar social and behavioral scientists to explain the causes of war, research on primate aggression became a compelling approach to studying the evolution of human warfare. In contrast, primatologist Frans de Waal's popular and scientific publications on primate reconciliation emphasized the naturalness of conflict resolution and peacemaking, thereby providing a counterpoint to the pessimism of aggression research while simultaneously shoring up the logic of simian analogy. De Waal's popular books heralded the "make love, not war" bonobo as humans' evolutionary next-of-kin and contributed to raising public interest in bonobos during the late twentieth century, although the apes' popular reputation subsequently exceeded the scientific discourse about them.
人们为什么要打仗?在第二次世界大战的破坏之后,这个问题变得尤为紧迫。从政治学到人类学,人文科学领域的战后学者们研究了人性在战争起因中的作用,即便他们也在争论人性本身的确切含义。在战后社会和行为科学家为解释战争起因所做的广泛努力中,对灵长类动物攻击行为的研究成为了一种极具吸引力的研究人类战争演变的方法。相比之下,灵长类动物学家弗兰斯·德瓦尔关于灵长类动物和解的通俗及科学著作强调了冲突解决与和平缔造的自然性,从而在为侵略研究的悲观论调提供了一个对立面的同时,也巩固了类人猿类比的逻辑。德瓦尔的通俗书籍将 “做爱,而非战争” 的倭黑猩猩誉为人类进化上的近亲,并在20世纪后期激发了公众对倭黑猩猩的兴趣,尽管这些猿类后来的大众声誉超出了关于它们的科学论述。