Suppr超能文献

光子计数乳腺计算机断层扫描、数字乳腺X线摄影和数字乳腺断层合成在评估乳腺标本中的性能。

Performance of Photon-Counting Breast Computed Tomography, Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Evaluating Breast Specimens.

作者信息

Rößler Ann-Christin, Kalender Willi, Kolditz Daniel, Steiding Christian, Ruth Veikko, Preuss Caroline, Peter Sandra Christina, Brehm Barbara, Hammon Matthias, Schulz-Wendtland Rüdiger, Wenkel Evelyn

机构信息

Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Henkestrasse 91, Erlangen 91052, Germany.

Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Henkestrasse 91, Erlangen 91052, Germany; AB-CT GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(2):184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.017. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study compared a novel photon-counting breast computed tomography (pcBCT) system with digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems. For this reason, surgical specimens were examined with all three techniques and rated by three observers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 surgical specimens were investigated with DM, DBT, and pcBCT; the associated images were shown to three experienced radiologists. Findings (22 microcalcifications and 23 mass lesions) were recorded and compared to the results of the pathological examination. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of microcalcifications and lesions were calculated and displayed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for microcalcifications was 82% for DM, 70% for DBT, and 85% for pcBCT. Specificity for microcalcifications was 71% for DM, 75% for DBT, and 83% for pcBCT. Sensitivity for lesions was 45% for DM, 62% for DBT, and 65% for pcBCT. Specificity for lesions was 76% for DM, 62% for DBT, and 76% for pcBCT.

CONCLUSIONS

pcBCT showed a comparable or superior performance compared to the clinically approved DM and DBT systems. Mass lesion detectability can be increased further by the use of contrast media.

摘要

原理与目的

本研究将一种新型的光子计数乳腺计算机断层扫描(pcBCT)系统与数字乳腺摄影(DM)和数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)系统进行了比较。因此,对手术标本采用这三种技术进行检查,并由三位观察者进行评分。

材料与方法

总共30个手术标本分别采用DM、DBT和pcBCT进行研究;相关图像展示给三位经验丰富的放射科医生。记录发现结果(22处微钙化和23处肿块病变),并与病理检查结果进行比较。计算微钙化和病变检测的敏感性和特异性,并使用受试者操作特征曲线进行展示。

结果

DM检测微钙化的敏感性为82%,DBT为70%,pcBCT为85%。DM检测微钙化的特异性为71%,DBT为75%,pcBCT为83%。DM检测病变的敏感性为45%,DBT为62%,pcBCT为65%。DM检测病变的特异性为76%,DBT为62%,pcBCT为76%。

结论

与临床认可的DM和DBT系统相比,pcBCT表现出相当或更优的性能。使用造影剂可进一步提高肿块病变的可检测性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验