Yang Hui-Ming, Zhao Jing, Xue Jia, Yang Yan-Ling, Zhang Guo-Zhong
Key Laboratory of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China.
Vaccine. 2017 Jan 3;35(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.048. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
Continued monitoring and evaluation of vaccine efficacy against prevalent or newly isolated strains has great importance in advising Newcastle disease (ND) immunization strategy. In this study, we systematically analysed the antigenic variation between genotype VII NDV aSG10 and the commercial vaccine strain LaSota, and assessed their efficacy against challenge with velogenic NDV by serological analysis and animal testing. We show that these two viruses are antigenically distinguishable; anti-NDV aSG10 hyper-immune sera demonstrated higher haemagglutination inhibition (HI) titres (11.13±0.30log) against the aSG10 virus, compared with titres against LaSota (9.53±0.50log). Conversely, the hyper-immune sera from LaSota showed higher HI titres against LaSota virus (9.73±0.36log), but 2-fold lower HI titre against aSG10 (8.87±0.38log). Each serum neutralised heterologous virus, but neutralisation titres were always 3- to 6-fold higher against its homologous strain than heterologous virus. The cross-reactivity R value between aSG10 and LaSota was 0.23, indicating that they are loosely related with major antigenic differences within a single serotype. The results of animal tests revealed that the aSG10 vaccine had a significantly higher protection rate than the LaSota vaccine against genotype VII NDV, regardless of intramuscular (IM) or eye drop/intranasal (ED/IN) route of SG10 challenge. Compared with IM administration, chicken flocks needed higher HI antibody levels to obtain sufficient protection when challenged by the natural ED/IN route. These results are highly informative for better control of ND in the poultry industry.
持续监测和评估疫苗对流行毒株或新分离毒株的效力,对于指导新城疫(ND)免疫策略至关重要。在本研究中,我们系统分析了基因型VII NDV aSG10与商业疫苗株LaSota之间的抗原变异,并通过血清学分析和动物试验评估了它们对强毒株NDV攻击的效力。我们发现这两种病毒在抗原上是可区分的;抗NDV aSG10超免疫血清对aSG10病毒表现出更高的血凝抑制(HI)效价(11.13±0.30log),而对LaSota的效价为(9.53±0.50log)。相反,LaSota的超免疫血清对LaSota病毒表现出更高的HI效价(9.73±0.36log),但对aSG10的HI效价低2倍(8.87±0.38log)。每种血清都能中和异源病毒,但对同源毒株的中和效价总是比对异源病毒高3至6倍。aSG10和LaSota之间的交叉反应R值为0.23,表明它们在单一血清型内主要抗原存在差异,关系较为松散。动物试验结果显示,无论采用肌肉注射(IM)还是滴眼/滴鼻(ED/IN)途径用aSG10攻毒,aSG10疫苗对基因型VII NDV的保护率都显著高于LaSota疫苗。与肌肉注射相比,鸡群通过自然ED/IN途径受到攻击时,需要更高的HI抗体水平才能获得足够的保护。这些结果对于更好地控制家禽业中的新城疫具有重要参考价值。