Suppr超能文献

一项评估胰蛋白酶:糜蛋白酶与沙雷肽酶以及胰蛋白酶:菠萝蛋白酶:芦丁糖苷相比在伤口处理中的疗效和耐受性的随机临床试验。

A Randomized, Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Tolerability of Trypsin:Chymotrypsin as Compared to Serratiopeptidase and Trypsin:Bromelain:Rutoside in Wound Management.

作者信息

Chandanwale Ajay, Langade Deepak, Sonawane Dheeraj, Gavai Piyush

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Grant Medical College and Sir J.J. Group of Hospitals, Byculla, Mumbai, 400 007, India.

B.J. Govt. Medical College, Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, India.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2017 Jan;34(1):180-198. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0444-0. Epub 2016 Nov 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Systemic enzyme therapy can play an important role in maintaining normal inflammatory processes within the body and thereby helps support and speed up healing. In the course of the anti-inflammatory action, enzymes degrade damaged cells and necrotic material and, through the inactivation of mediators and toxic products, they restrict the edema and pain.

METHOD

The study conducted at Grant Medical College, Mumbai, India was a clinical trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of three oral enzyme treatment groups-oral tablets containing trypsin:chymotrypsin (TC) (Chymoral Forte), serratiopeptidase (S) 5 mg oral tablets, and oral enzyme tablets containing trypsin 48 mg, bromelain 90 mg, and rutoside 100 mg (TBR)-to evaluate their healing potential in surgical wounds after orthopedic surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients were screened, randomized, and divided into three groups in 1:1:1 ratio receiving either of the three treatments. In the TC group, erythema was significantly reduced from 3.44 on day 3 to 1.16 on day 10 (p < 0.01). There was significantly better reduction in erythema scores in the TC group as compared to S and TBR groups (p < 0.05) at each follow-up visit. Similarly reduction in the local irritation, wound discharge, edema, induration, and tenderness score with TC treatment at the end of the study was significantly higher than that observed in the other two groups. In addition TC showed significant reduction in pain on the VAS scale (p < 0.01). Global assessment of response to therapy for efficacy and tolerability was reported to be good to excellent in 88% and 92% of the patients on TC as compared to 12% and 8% with S and 12% and 8% with TBR.

CONCLUSION

TC provides a better resolution of symptoms of inflammation after orthopedic surgery as compared to S and TBR, thus facilitating better wound healing. Further studies are warranted to confirm the findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registry of India (Reg. No. CTRI/2011/07/001920).

摘要

引言

全身酶疗法在维持体内正常炎症过程中可发挥重要作用,从而有助于支持和加速愈合。在抗炎作用过程中,酶可降解受损细胞和坏死物质,并通过使介质和有毒产物失活来限制水肿和疼痛。

方法

在印度孟买格兰特医学院进行的这项研究是一项临床试验,比较了三个口服酶治疗组的疗效和耐受性,这三个组分别是含胰蛋白酶:糜蛋白酶(TC)的口服片剂(强力糜蛋白酶)、5毫克沙雷肽酶(S)口服片剂以及含48毫克胰蛋白酶、90毫克菠萝蛋白酶和100毫克芦丁的口服酶片剂(TBR),以评估它们在骨科手术后手术伤口的愈合潜力。

结果

总共筛选了75名患者,随机将其按1:1:1的比例分为三组,分别接受三种治疗中的一种。在TC组中,红斑从第3天的3.44显著降至第10天的1.16(p < 0.01)。在每次随访时,TC组的红斑评分降低幅度明显优于S组和TBR组(p < 0.05)。同样,在研究结束时,TC治疗使局部刺激、伤口渗出、水肿、硬结和压痛评分的降低幅度显著高于其他两组。此外,TC在视觉模拟评分法(VAS)上的疼痛评分显著降低(p < 0.01)。据报告,在接受TC治疗的患者中,88%的患者对治疗疗效的总体评估为良好至优秀,92%的患者对治疗耐受性的总体评估为良好至优秀,而接受S治疗的患者分别为12%和8%,接受TBR治疗的患者分别为12%和8%。

结论

与S和TBR相比,TC能更好地缓解骨科手术后的炎症症状,从而促进更好的伤口愈合。有必要进行进一步研究以证实这些发现。

试验注册

印度临床试验注册中心(注册号CTRI/2011/07/001920)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验