Barraclough Simon, Morrow Martha
a School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University , Victoria , Australia.
b Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne , Victoria , Australia.
Ethn Health. 2017 Apr;22(2):130-144. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2016.1244620. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
To identify the historical nexus between Malaysia's largest and politically dominant ethnic group and the political economy of tobacco, and to consider the implications of this connection for tobacco control.
Primary and secondary documentary sources in both English and Malay were analysed to illuminate key events and decisions, and the discourse of industry and government. Sources included: speeches by Malaysian political and industry actors; tobacco industry reports, press releases and websites; government documents; World Health Organization (WHO) tobacco control literature; and press reports.
Malays have the highest smoking prevalence among Malaysia's major ethnic groups. The tobacco industry has consistently been promoted as furthering Malay economic development. Malays play the major role in growing and curing. Government-owned Malay development trusts have been prominent investors in tobacco corporations, which have cultivated linkages with the Malay elite. The religious element of Malay ethnicity has also been significant. All Malays are Muslim, and the National Fatwa Council has declared smoking to be haram (forbidden); however, the Government has declined to implement this ruling.
Exaggerated claims for the socio-economic benefits of tobacco production, government investment and close links between tobacco corporations and sections of the Malay elite have created a conflict of interest in public policy, limited the focus on tobacco as a health policy issue among Malays and retarded tobacco control policy. More recently, ratification of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, regional free trade policies reducing the numbers of growers, concerns about smoking from an Islamic viewpoint, and anxieties about the effects of smoking upon youth have increasingly challenged the dominant discourse that tobacco furthers Malay interests. Nevertheless, the industry remains a formidable political and economic presence in Malaysia that is likely to continue to proclaim that its activities coincide with Malay socio-economic interests.
确定马来西亚最大且在政治上占主导地位的族群与烟草政治经济之间的历史联系,并思考这种联系对烟草控制的影响。
对英文和马来文的一手及二手文献资料进行分析,以阐明关键事件、决策以及行业和政府的话语。资料来源包括:马来西亚政治和行业参与者的演讲;烟草行业报告、新闻稿和网站;政府文件;世界卫生组织(WHO)的烟草控制文献;以及新闻报道。
在马来西亚的主要族群中,马来人的吸烟率最高。烟草行业一直被宣传为促进马来经济发展。马来人在种植和晾晒烟草方面发挥着主要作用。政府所有的马来发展信托基金一直是烟草公司的主要投资者,这些公司与马来精英建立了联系。马来族群的宗教因素也很重要。所有马来人都是穆斯林,国家教法委员会已宣布吸烟为哈拉姆(被禁止);然而,政府拒绝执行这一裁决。
对烟草生产的社会经济效益的夸大说法、政府投资以及烟草公司与部分马来精英之间的密切联系,在公共政策中造成了利益冲突,限制了在马来人中将烟草作为健康政策问题的关注,并阻碍了烟草控制政策。最近,批准《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约》、减少种植者数量的区域自由贸易政策、从伊斯兰教观点对吸烟的担忧以及对吸烟对年轻人影响的焦虑,越来越多地挑战了烟草促进马来人利益的主导话语。尽管如此,该行业在马来西亚仍然是一股强大的政治和经济力量,可能会继续宣称其活动与马来社会经济利益相符。