Suppr超能文献

东南亚烟草与扶贫的政治经济学:国家角色的矛盾。

The political economy of tobacco and poverty alleviation in Southeast Asia: contradictions in the role of the state.

机构信息

School of Health, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia.

出版信息

Glob Health Promot. 2010 Mar;17(1 Suppl):40-50. doi: 10.1177/1757975909358243.

Abstract

Of the members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), all but Indonesia have embraced the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and all endorse some form of tobacco control policy. Nevertheless, except for Brunei, all these states are, to varying degrees, complicit in investing in or promoting the tobacco industry, often using the justification of poverty alleviation. Tobacco use is the major preventable cause of illness and death among the populations of these countries. Claims that tobacco alleviates poverty in developing countries have increasingly been discredited: thus continuing state support for the industry represents a fundamental paradox. Using primary documents from governments and the tobacco industry, and published studies investigating tobacco and poverty, this article explores the contradictions inherent in the state seeking to prevent tobacco use in the interests of health, while actively promoting tobacco for the economic benefit of its citizens. These contradictions result in both symbolic and substantial harm to tobacco control efforts: tobacco production is legitimized, rational policy principles are violated, direct cooperation between the state and multinational tobacco corporations is made possible with associated opportunities for mollifying control policies, and different state agencies work at cross purposes. Although tobacco exports within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) also threaten the group's health solidarity, it is argued that divestiture of state ownership of capital in tobacco corporations and a commitment by states not to promote tobacco are urgently required if the Convention is to have full effect both in the countries of the region and in other states that have ratified it.

摘要

东南亚国家联盟(东盟)的成员国中,除印度尼西亚外,其他国家均已加入《烟草控制框架公约》,并支持某种形式的烟草控制政策。然而,除文莱外,所有这些国家都在不同程度上参与了对烟草业的投资或支持,其常见的理由是为了扶贫。在这些国家的民众中,烟草使用是导致疾病和死亡的主要可预防原因。烟草业有助于发展中国家减贫的说法越来越站不住脚:因此,继续支持该行业与国家的政策宗旨背道而驰。本文利用政府和烟草业的原始文件以及调查烟草与贫困问题的已发表研究,探讨了国家在为了民众健康利益而寻求预防烟草使用的同时,却积极促进烟草业以造福本国公民这一固有矛盾。这些矛盾对烟草控制工作造成了象征性和实质性的危害:烟草生产合法化,违反了合理的政策原则,为国家与跨国烟草公司之间的直接合作创造了条件,同时也为缓和控制政策提供了机会,导致不同的国家机构之间目标不一致。尽管东盟内部的烟草出口也对该集团的健康团结构成威胁,但有人认为,如果要使《公约》在该地区各国和其他已批准该公约的国家充分生效,就迫切需要放弃国家对烟草公司的资本所有权,并承诺不促进烟草业。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验