• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在城市环境中,研究住房的区域层面空间指标与选定的健康和幸福行为及结果之间的关联。

Examining associations between area-level spatial measures of housing with selected health and wellbeing behaviours and outcomes in an urban context.

作者信息

Badland Hannah, Foster Sarah, Bentley Rebecca, Higgs Carl, Roberts Rebecca, Pettit Christopher, Giles-Corti Billie

机构信息

Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Centre for the Built Environment and Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Health Place. 2017 Jan;43:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.11.003
PMID:27894015
Abstract

Adequate and affordable housing is a major social determinant of health; yet no work has attempted to conceptually map and spatially test area-level measures of housing with selected health and wellbeing outcomes. Sourcing data from 7,753 adults from Melbourne, Australia, we tested associations between area-level measures of housing density, tenure, and affordability with individual-level measures of neighbourhood safety, community satisfaction, and self-rated health. Compared with the reference groups, the odds of: feeling unsafe was higher for residents living in areas with less affordable housing; community dissatisfaction was ~30% higher in those living in areas with >36% residential properties assigned as rentals, and was significantly higher in the least affordable areas (OR =1.57). Compared with the reference groups, as dwelling density, proportion of rental properties, and housing unaffordability increased, the odds of reporting poorer self-rated health increased; however these associations did not always reach statistical significance. This work highlights the benefits of evidenced-based planning spatial measures to support health and wellbeing.

摘要

充足且负担得起的住房是健康的一个主要社会决定因素;然而,尚未有研究尝试从概念上绘制并在空间上检验住房的区域层面指标与选定的健康和幸福结果之间的关系。我们从澳大利亚墨尔本的7753名成年人中获取数据,检验了住房密度、 tenure(此处可能有误,推测为“产权”之类意思)和可负担性的区域层面指标与邻里安全、社区满意度和自我评估健康的个体层面指标之间的关联。与参照组相比,住房可负担性较低地区的居民感到不安全的几率更高;居住在出租房产占比超过36%地区的居民社区不满情绪高出约30%,且在最不可负担地区显著更高(比值比=1.57)。与参照组相比,随着居住密度、出租房产比例和住房不可负担性增加,自我评估健康状况较差的几率增加;然而这些关联并不总是具有统计学意义。这项工作凸显了基于证据的规划空间措施对支持健康和幸福的益处。

相似文献

1
Examining associations between area-level spatial measures of housing with selected health and wellbeing behaviours and outcomes in an urban context.在城市环境中,研究住房的区域层面空间指标与选定的健康和幸福行为及结果之间的关联。
Health Place. 2017 Jan;43:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
2
Testing spatial measures of alcohol outlet density with self-rated health in the Australian context: Implications for policy and practice.在澳大利亚背景下,用自评健康状况检验酒精销售点密度的空间测量指标:对政策和实践的启示。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2016 May;35(3):298-306. doi: 10.1111/dar.12341. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
3
Housing Satisfaction in Finland with Regard to Area, Dwelling Type and Tenure Status.芬兰在区域、住宅类型和居住权状况方面的住房满意度。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;23(4):314-20. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a4080.
4
Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health.城市宜居性:澳大利亚的新经验教训,用于探索衡量健康社会决定因素指标的潜力。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jun;111:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
5
Reconnecting urban planning with health: a protocol for the development and validation of national liveability indicators associated with noncommunicable disease risk behaviours and health outcomes.重新将城市规划与健康联系起来:一项关于制定和验证与非传染性疾病风险行为及健康结果相关的国家宜居性指标的方案。
Public Health Res Pract. 2014 Nov 28;25(1):e2511405. doi: 10.17061/phrp2511405.
6
Higher levels of greenness and biodiversity associate with greater subjective wellbeing in adults living in Melbourne, Australia.在澳大利亚墨尔本生活的成年人中,更高水平的绿化和生物多样性与更高的主观幸福感相关。
Health Place. 2019 May;57:321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 28.
7
Housing insecurity and health among people in South Korea: focusing on tenure and affordability.住房无保障与韩国民众健康:关注住房保有形式和可负担性。
Public Health. 2019 Jun;171:116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 May 22.
8
Spatial and socioeconomic inequities in liveability in Australia's 21 largest cities: Does city size matter?澳大利亚21个最大城市宜居性的空间和社会经济不平等:城市规模重要吗?
Health Place. 2022 Nov;78:102899. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102899. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
9
The relationship between ethnic composition of the residential environment and self-reported health among Turks and Moroccans in Amsterdam.阿姆斯特丹土耳其人和摩洛哥人的居住环境种族构成与自我报告健康状况之间的关系。
Int J Health Geogr. 2017 Apr 12;16(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0084-x.
10
Housing and health in three contrasting neighbourhoods in Accra, Ghana.加纳阿克拉三个截然不同社区的住房与健康。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jun;72(11):1864-72. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.023. Epub 2011 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Policy relevant health related liveability indicator datasets for addresses in Australia's 21 largest cities.澳大利亚 21 个最大城市地址的与政策相关的健康相关宜居性指标数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Feb 25;10(1):113. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02013-5.
2
Financial Hardship, Hope, and Life Satisfaction Among Un/Underemployed Individuals With Psychiatric Diagnoses: A Mediation Analysis.患有精神疾病的未就业/就业不足个体的经济困难、希望和生活满意度:一项中介分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 22;13:867421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867421. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessing Trade-Offs and Optimal Ranges of Density for Life Expectancy and 12 Causes of Mortality in Metro Vancouver, Canada, 1990-2016.
评估加拿大温哥华都会区 1990-2016 年预期寿命和 12 种死因的密度权衡和最佳范围。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 2;19(5):2900. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052900.
4
How Can the Lived Environment Support Healthy Ageing? A Spatial Indicators Framework for the Assessment of Age-Friendly Communities.生活环境如何支持健康老龄化?评估宜居社区的空间指标框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20):7685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207685.
5
Housing for People with an Acquired Brain or Spinal Injury: Mapping the Australian Funding Landscape.后天性脑或脊髓损伤人士的住房:绘制澳大利亚资金全景图。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 7;16(16):2822. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162822.
6
What is the meaning of urban liveability for a city in a low-to-middle-income country? Contextualising liveability for Bangkok, Thailand.对于中低收入国家的城市来说,城市宜居性意味着什么?以泰国曼谷为例,探讨宜居性的背景。
Global Health. 2019 Jul 30;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0484-8.
7
The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice.城市宜居指数:开发一个与政策相关的城市宜居综合指标,并评估其与交通方式选择的关系。
Int J Health Geogr. 2019 Jun 11;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12942-019-0178-8.
8
Spatial Enablement to Support Environmental, Demographic, Socioeconomics, and Health Data Integration and Analysis for Big Cities: A Case Study With Asthma Hospitalizations in New York City.支持大城市环境、人口、社会经济和健康数据整合与分析的空间赋能:以纽约市哮喘住院情况为例的案例研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Apr 24;6:84. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00084. eCollection 2019.