Suppr超能文献

城市宜居性:澳大利亚的新经验教训,用于探索衡量健康社会决定因素指标的潜力。

Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health.

作者信息

Badland Hannah, Whitzman Carolyn, Lowe Melanie, Davern Melanie, Aye Lu, Butterworth Iain, Hes Dominique, Giles-Corti Billie

机构信息

McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 5, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Victoria 3010, Australia.

Faculty of Architecture, Building, and Planning, The University of Melbourne, 757 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3010, Australia.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jun;111:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

Abstract

It has long been recognised that urban form impacts on health outcomes and their determinants. There is growing interest in creating indicators of liveability to measure progress towards achieving a wide range of policy outcomes, including enhanced health and wellbeing, and reduced inequalities. This review aimed to: 1) bring together the concepts of urban 'liveability' and social determinants of health; 2) synthesise the various liveability indicators developed to date; and 3) assess their quality using a health and wellbeing lens. Between 2011 and 2013, the research team reviewed 114 international academic and policy documents, as well as reports related to urban liveability. Overall, 233 indicators were found. Of these, 61 indicators were regarded as promising, 57 indicators needed further development, and 115 indicators were not useful for our purposes. Eleven domains of liveability were identified that likely contribute to health and wellbeing through the social determinants of health. These were: crime and safety; education; employment and income; health and social services; housing; leisure and culture; local food and other goods; natural environment; public open space; transport; and social cohesion and local democracy. Many of the indicators came from Australian sources; however most remain relevant from a 'global north' perspective. Although many indicators were identified, there was inconsistency in how these domains were measured. Few have been validated to assess their association with health and wellbeing outcomes, and little information was provided for how they should be applied to guide urban policy and practice. There is a substantial opportunity to further develop these measures to create a series of robust and evidence-based liveability indices, which could be linked with existing health and wellbeing data to better inform urban planning policies within Australia and beyond.

摘要

长期以来,人们已经认识到城市形态会影响健康结果及其决定因素。人们越来越关注创建宜居性指标,以衡量在实现广泛政策成果方面取得的进展,包括增进健康和福祉以及减少不平等。本综述旨在:1)整合城市“宜居性”概念与健康的社会决定因素;2)综合迄今为止制定的各种宜居性指标;3)从健康和福祉的角度评估其质量。在2011年至2013年期间,研究团队查阅了114份国际学术和政策文件以及与城市宜居性相关的报告。总体而言,共发现233项指标。其中,61项指标被认为有前景,57项指标需要进一步完善,115项指标对我们的目的无用。确定了11个宜居性领域,这些领域可能通过健康的社会决定因素对健康和福祉做出贡献。它们是:犯罪与安全;教育;就业与收入;健康与社会服务;住房;休闲与文化;本地食品及其他商品;自然环境;公共开放空间;交通;以及社会凝聚力和地方民主。许多指标来自澳大利亚的资料;然而,从“全球北方”的角度来看,大多数指标仍然具有相关性。尽管确定了许多指标,但这些领域的衡量方式并不一致。很少有指标经过验证以评估它们与健康和福祉结果的关联,而且关于如何应用这些指标来指导城市政策和实践的信息也很少。有很大的机会进一步完善这些措施,以创建一系列强大且基于证据的宜居性指数,这些指数可以与现有的健康和福祉数据相联系,以便更好地为澳大利亚国内外的城市规划政策提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验